Question Sidemount rebreather as a first rebreather

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I'am a backmount JJ-CCR diver. I don't know much about sidemount rebreathers, but to my knowledge teh main issue with SM rebreathers is flooding and being less easy to recover from a flood. As a new rebreather diver you're likely to (partially) flood the unit at least once.

Therefore it is advides to start with backmount rebreathers. At least, that's what I heard.
 
I am on the same boat and getting my first unit next month. Majority of people I have spoken advised against sidemount/chest mount units as a first CCR.


My first and only rebreather is my optima cm; I don’t think it has the concerns that SM CCRs like the Liberty , sidekick , sf2 have.
 
I was thinking of starting a similar thread. I'm torn between the Gemini and Choptima (and Fathom BM, given the ubiquitous advice against the SW (and maybe the Gemini?), as a "first unit"). I'm also looking at it mainly from the perspective of cave diving, with a bit of deeper OW wrecks (40-100m) as well. Apparently, none are perfect for all scenarios, so I'm going to need more than one!
I dove sm for many years. I ended up choosing a bm fathom due to my personal beliefs (Prefer mccr, there are many many negatives to a sm ccr, prefer a unit with minimal proprietary parts). When you learn about the fathom, it's very hard to beat in the mccr bm world. I have been exceptionally happy with my decision, and honestly don't miss sm at all. I have a renewed love for the simplicity of bm and now do most of my oc cave dives in bm. The fathom is excellent for your needs. You can dive with sm bailout in the caves and dive with the tech setup with lola valves for boat or do both in either scenario. It's also a very easy unit to set up for trimix diving due to ease of separating suit gas.
There are many drawbacks to a sm ccr and unfortunately a new ccr diver won't have enough experience to understand them. I believe it's been a huge disservice to have the sidewinder pushed as a first time ccr.
Start with a bm unit and then go from there.
 
I am on the same boat and getting my first unit next month. Majority of people I have spoken advised against sidemount/chest mount units as a first CCR.
Interesting that chest mounted units are also mentioned, from my reading, my understanding is that there arent major differences between chest vs back mounted units. Either your rb will be easier on the inhale or on the exhale, thats about it

This really sounds like ongoing debates of a move from single to double tanks (and whether or not it is 'better' to move to backmount doubles first, and only moving to sidemount when you really need that 'special tool'). Apart from any issues that may have occurred in SM rebreathers, this very much sounds like the same discussion.
Dont think there is any debate on sm vs doubles, Bogaerts has proven pretty convincingly that it absolutely doesn't matter and you can start with either one. But when it comes to sm vs backmounted rebreathers, there are objective tradeoffs, which I am trying to understand more

It is important to distinguish a true sidemount rebreather, Liberty, SF2, Sidekick, from the Sidewinder which is not actually a sidemounted rebreather, it's a REALLY wide backmount rebreather. The list of reasons why the sidemount specific units aren't ideal as a first rebreather don't necessarily apply to the Sidewinder but the Sidewinder itself has some concerns for a new rebreather diver due to its design. Some of these are addressed in the 2.0 that was released this week but not all of them.
"True sm" rebreathers had major wob issues because the counterlung was located very far away. The concept behind sw solved some of those issues and provided better wob relative to "true" sm rebreathers. Is that correct? Which means that the hate for the SW mainly comes from quality woes, as opposed to the concept as a whole?
 
Interesting that chest mounted units are also mentioned, from my reading, my understanding is that there arent major differences between chest vs back mounted units. Either your rb will be easier on the inhale or on the exhale, thats about it


Dont think there is any debate on sm vs doubles, Bogaerts has proven pretty convincingly that it absolutely doesn't matter and you can start with either one. But when it comes to sm vs backmounted rebreathers, there are objective tradeoffs, which I am trying to understand more


"True sm" rebreathers had major wob issues because the counterlung was located very far away. The concept behind sw solved some of those issues and provided better wob relative to "true" sm rebreathers. Is that correct? Which means that the hate for the SW mainly comes from quality woes, as opposed to the concept as a whole?

It's unfortunately not that simple. We are talking about fundamental design differences in the rebreathers and it doesn't have much to do with where they are located on your body.
The RB-80 evolved into the SF2 which has the bellows on the bottom. It is there whether you are diving a backmount unit or a sidemount unit and that makes the WoB of that unit very susceptible to your trim. It does the same thing whether it is on your side or on your back though with the sidemount unit it is also suspectible to roll which we tend not to worry too much about.
Sidekick is similar with regards to WoB but the WoB on these units when they are fit properly to the diver is perfectly fine so I would not say they have "major WoB issues" just that they are less forgiving to improper fit or major deviations in pitch and roll.
The Liberty puts the counterlungs right under your armpit so it is not really susceptible to big swings in WoB with trim, no worse than a backmount unit, but is still susceptible to roll.
One useful piece of feedback that you get from a backmount unit is the "gurgle" where liquid on the exhale side will back up against the mushroom valve and tell you if you are getting too much spit/water/etc in that loop. None of the chestmount or sidemount units will give you that type of feedback because the mouthpiece is the highest point of the loop. The Sidewinder can give you that feedback if it is configured properly which is helpful, granted if you have the Poseidon BOV it won't but that's the BOV itself, does it on the Se7en and on my Meg.

As you can see above, the writeup on what you asked from @rddvet is not so much about sidemount vs. backmount rebreathers but it's about the individual units and how they were designed. Most backmount units operate on the same fundamental design. Mouthpiece, exhale counterlung, canister in the middle, inhale counterlung. There are some exceptions like like the Revo/SF2, but most of them follow that same design paradigm and make them all functionally identical from a basic design perspective. Sure they're all slightly different with their own quirks but when we talk about the fundamental design of the unit a Meg, XCCR, Fathom, APD, Liberty, etc. they're all the same. When we talk about sidemount rebreathers though the only parallel that can be drawn between an SF2, Liberty, and Sidekick is that they are on the side of your body, they are all very fundamentally different rebreather designs so you can't simplify a backmount/sidemount comparison.

@Cheizz Part of why you are seeing so much of this discussion is because of how relatively easy the Sidewinder is to start into the CCR world, particularly if you are already diving sidemount so a ton of units are being promoted and sold to divers that really have no business being on rebreather to begin with, heaven forbid being on a unit with design compromises to facilitate types of cave diving that maybe 3 dozen people in the world are actually doing.
 
My first and only rebreather is my optima cm; I don’t think it has the concerns that SM CCRs like the Liberty , sidekick , sf2 have.
Correct, it seems solid machine does the job well.
 
Just because it is advised or I decided otherwise, that doesn’t necessarily mean bad mouth or disregard qualities of the well made properly functioning machine made by reputable company that provides good care to their customers. No need to be fanatic just because you have picked one versus other.

I still believe Choptima is very well machine and will do it’s job perfectly.
 
Just because it is advised or I decided otherwise, that doesn’t necessarily mean bad mouth or disregard qualities of the well made properly functioning machine made by reputable company that provides good care to their customers. No need to be fanatic just because you have picked one versus other.

I still believe Choptima is very well machine and will do it’s job perfectly.


Wut?

Strawman and ad hominem much?

Relax guy, your combination of posts confused me and seemed somewhat at odds with one another.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom