R
redacted
Guest
One major problem with most of the posts in this thread is a dive shop makes little or no money on selling tanks.
Perhaps, they might make a little more money on hydro's and VIP's.
However the Risk is high on filling tanks, again for little profit.
After 20 years, it makes more sense to replace the tank and valve than to hydro and VIP it.
If you figure out the cost of hydro and VIP against getting a brand new tank and valve, you are better off replacing an old tank.
If your tank fails, you just wasted your money.
Any tank that was made before 1990 should be scrutinized.
I wish all the tanks and valves in the tropics were replaced at least every 10 years.
After 10 years, most of them are trashed and need to be replaced.
In what way is LDS profit at all a problem in this thread?
If LDSs are not making $$ selling tank, who's problem is that? Who has complete control over that.
The risk involved in filling properly inspected tanks using generally accepted procedures is minimal. And the price of that fill is entirely of the shops choosing. How much less fill $$ would your shop take in if you stopped filling any tanks but your own? You don't even need to consider the incidental losses as you would then lose customers to other providers. Chance are most dive shop personnel are under a greater risk from traffic accidents going to and from work than from filling tanks.
Do you have data to support your 20 year life contention. As I see it, a hydro and VIP costs about $40. A new tank costs between $200 and $400. So it would take at least 1 in 5 to 1 in 10 failing at the 20 year mark for the user to break even. Any tank that comes in for hydro/VIP should receive an appropriate test/inspection independent of the tank's age (but dependent on materials and specs). What is it you do to older tanks that you fail to do for newer tanks?
LDSs with your attitude should make customers think twice about where they want to take their business.