• Welcome to ScubaBoard

  1. Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

    Benefits of registering include

    • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
    • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
    • You can make this box go away

    Joining is quick and easy. Login or Register now by clicking on the button

All funding cut for Aquarius

Discussion in 'Marine Science and Physiology' started by Wookie, Mar 9, 2012.

  1. Wookie

    Wookie ScubaBoard Business Sponsor ScubaBoard Business Sponsor

    7,273
    8,140
    113
    The Aquarius offshore laboratory received it's death blow this week when funding levels were set at about 1.2 million dollars, which is just about enough to finish the final mission for NASA.

    Aquarius was originally conceived and funded by NOAA's National Undersea Research Program (NURP) in the mid 1980s. The underwater laboratory was built by Victoria Machine Works in 1986-87. Initial deployment was in the U.S. Virgin Islands where 13 missions were conducted before Hurricane Hugo struck in 1989, and devastated St. Croix. Aquarius was retrieved from the seafloor in 1990 and was moved to North Carolina where it was refurbished under the direction of the University of North Carolina at Wilmington (UNCW). In 1993, the laboratory was redeployed in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, and supported 22 missions during the next three years. In 1996, Aquarius was recovered, and refurbished again. Many improvements were made to the system including construction of a semi-autonomous life support buoy that replaced a 17 by 34-meter life support barge. Aquarius was redeployed in 1997 and operations resumed in 1998.

    The support buoy is in a shipyard in Miami at this time undergoing a complex overhaul and drydocking, and was expected to be re-deployed in the next month with all new solar panels and systems. For the past few years, Aquarius has been primarily funded by NASA to support weightless living by astronauts with a few NOAA missions thrown in. NASA paid for a mission last year which was cancelled for weather. Now, the buoy must be retrieved from the boat yard and set in place, and the final mission must be run. The old support vessel which was designed to retrieve the Aquarius is long gone, so it isn't clear how NOAA will get the Aquarius brought up from the bottom. It's sad to be losing a piece of working history like this. Pink slips have been and will be issued to the crew.
     
  2. fisheater

    fisheater Divemaster Candidate

    # of Dives: 200 - 499
    Location: Sebastopol, CA
    4,390
    946
    113
    :-(


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  3. hogpark7430

    hogpark7430 Nassau Grouper

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Castle Pines, CO
    75
    46
    0
    Bummer maybe they can sell it to scubaboard. ;)
     
  4. jm

    jm PADI Pro

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Ontario, Canada
    147
    38
    0
    Perhaps that is not too bad an idea. Not Scubaboard exactly but the greater dive community at large. It is said that hunters and anglers spend a great deal of money to support wildlife so that they can continue to enjoy their sports.The question is without aquatic research of this type will we continue to enjoy what we have? We do have a tremendous stake in not only preservation of the underwater habitat but also the benefits this facility brings to others sciences.

    If this facility is useful to science (I must qualify this as I am a layman, meaning dumb as a bag of hammers science wise) perhaps Scubaboard could look at setting up a Paypal donaton system in conjunction with the University of North Carolina Wilmington. Set it up as a lottery with the prize being a couple of days for two on board the Aquarius, near the end of a mission. Of course you would have to help the researchers assuming that you meet their criteria but it would be a really unique experience. Imagine the opportunity for learning when housed with some of the researchers! Not to mention the truly unique nature of the experience. You could pair it up with some secondary prizes such as diving in the area with perhaps a quick peek into the facilities (at least a couple of minutes in the "wet porch"). I'm not advocating wrecking the useful science being done by turning it into a tourist attraction but instead helping them to meet their costs as well as creating an awareness of this facility. If it wasn't too expensive I'd definitely kick in some money for a chance like that!! Personally, aerospace and diving are two of my strong interests and the chance (even a small chance) of meeting some of the leading experts in these fields would be right off the scale of cool.

    Please chime in and see what everyone else thinks about this. By the way, I live in Canada and have no connection with any of these institutions.

    Here is the link: Home | NOAA’s Aquarius Reef Base
     
  5. koozemani

    koozemani Loggerhead Turtle

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Tucson, AZ
    2,088
    669
    113
    I recently saw it featured on some tv show. JM, a little working vacation for interested people might well be the answer. I know I'd would be interested.
     
  6. TSandM

    TSandM Missed and loved by many.

    # of Dives:
    Location: Woodinville, WA
    36,350
    13,498
    0
    Sad to see yet another effort at exploration and new understanding fall to the axe of a budget overburdened with social services. We used to dream . . .
     
    Boiler_81 and mathauck0814 like this.
  7. gkndivebum

    gkndivebum CCR Instructor

    # of Dives:
    Location: Kona, Hawaii
    435
    36
    0
    :depressed:

    A friend and local dive buddy (the DSO at UHH) spent a week in saturation there last summer in support of a mission. It was quite amusing to get a tour of the facility via Skype.
     
  8. maiker

    maiker Angel Fish

    12
    0
    0
    Please chime in and see what everyone else thinks about this.
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Reck Diver

    Reck Diver Regular of the Pub

    # of Dives: I just don't log dives
    Location:
    542
    172
    43
    Frankly after NOAA's Party Boat fiasco, they should be glad they get a dime of my tax dollars
     
  10. Thalassamania

    Thalassamania Diving Polymath ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives:
    Location: On a large pile of smokin' A'a, the most isolated
    22,159
    2,732
    0
    Admirable sentiments, but there are two problems:

    1. No taxpayer money was spent on the "Party boat."
    2. NOAA is an amalgam of organizations that were, in 1970, glued together by Richard Nixon and stuffed into DOC without a whole lot of thought. Opposing the Aquarius because of something the Fish Cops did is, to say the least, nonsensical.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2012
    DocVikingo likes this.

Share This Page