pt40fathoms once bubbled...
One of my main concerns is that DIR and Halcyon happen to be so closely related. The hostile bias to any other manufacturer, other than the ones listed by the DIR advocates leaves a very cold feeling in me.
I have to somewhat agree with this statement. I was eagerly looking checking the mail every day for my DIR Fundamentals book from GUE. After it arrived and I started reading it I was rather disappointed by a few things. The first was that the back cover listed JJ as CEO of Halcyon and E/E. I bought the book to enhance my skills and training based on his diving abilities, not his business skills in starting and running two other companies.
I was also rather saddened that there were numerous mentions of the GUE website and DIRQuest in the book, as well as specific mentions of Halcyon products. The reason for this is because it appeard to ( keyword here---> ) *ME* that the mention of this stuff was somewhat of a marketing ploy. As someone pointed out earlier in this post, other manufacturers are starting to make DIR friendly gear now, so by making specific references to equimpent, etc. I feel that the book is in danger of becoming dated rather quickly. Not in the training or philosopy aspect, just in the gear aspect.
Halcyon may make *THE* wing for DIR diving now, but tomorrow someone else may improve on that. Just my *PERSONAL* opinion, but I would have preferred to see the book mention something along the lines that 'in choosing a wing, these minimum considerations must be taken into account' rather than saying "purchase a BC that is specifically designed for DIR, namely the Halcyon BC."
Reading some of the passages like that in the book, I felt in some ways they were plugging equipment sales for Halcyon, which the book stated JJ was CEO of.
Don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with promoting a product (tho everyone screams that PADI is too $$ oriented), I just felt that for a training guide, this book crossed the line once or twice by recommending specific equipment. In 5 years I would like to be able to go back and find that all the information in it still holds true, and if it was strictly skills or training it would. Or if it just set a minimum requirement for each piece of equipment it would. I just felt that by giving a *SPECIFIC* recommendation, it opened up the possibility of becoming dated rather quickly. Or maybe this was the idea, so that we will have to buy a follow up book?
Again guys, this is NOT a flame post. I like the DIR system and I am taking one of the classes next weekend. I am just stating that these were a few things that bothered *ME* personally about it. I just don't see how the strict DIR advocates can complain about PADI (put another dollar in) when it appears to me that GUE is guilty of the same thing to some degree.
IMH experience, I have found that I can learn something from just about everybody, so I try not to close my mind to the opinions or of any person or group.
Just my $.02...