hi
- would anybody have any idea (guess ?) what the main difference would be in qualityterms between the existing 7-14, which is in the pro-range of Oly (but anyhow unaffordable), and the new 8(?)-16(?)mm which will be in the standard range ?
- what would be the main advantage of the 100mm macro (1:1) compared to the 50mm (1:2) ? probably the opportunity to stay a litle further from the animal ? Is this then really compared to a 200 mm in analog terms ? You could 'take ' the eye of a pygmeeseahorse ?
so both lensens are more to be expected in september probably ?
jan