Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 185,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: What Happened to Cryogenic Scuba?

 

  1. #1



    .
     

    Akimbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mendocino, California
    Dives
    5,000 - ∞
    Photos
    22

    Question What Happened to Cryogenic Scuba?

    There were articles on Cryogenic (liquefied air) Scuba developed by Jim Woodberry in the June (page 22) & December (page 28) 1967 issues of Skin Diver Magazine. Basically, liquid air was stored in Dewar flasks and warmed into gaseous air for breathing. Skin Diver’s editor, Paul Tzimoulis, reported diving a prototype to 100’ and the inventor diving to 200’.

    The December article indicated that Mako (the air compressor manufacturer) was weeks away from finalizing the design and shipping production units. That was the last word I ever found on the subject.

    So what happened? Did they discover a concept flaw, decide it wasn’t marketable, couldn’t deal with the weight change in the days before BCs, or there was not enough patent protection to justify bringing it to market?

    The advantages are that the liquid to gaseous conversion is ~1:815 versus ~1:234 for a 3,442 PSI bottle and the operating pressure is below 250 PSI. Among the disadvantages is a pressure gauge would not indicate remaining air.

  2. #2
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    #93, 100 is even nearer !
     

    emoreira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    ARGENTINA
    Posts
    852
    Dives
    50 - 99
    When I was in the SSI OWD course 4 years ago, I also asked to the instructor what about a liquid air tank. He knew nothing about it, but the only point we discussed was the need of a different and very expensive production plant to fill tanks.
    Another point would be the cold air that the diver should breathe.
    Tired of such a long Surface Interval.
    Eduardo

  3. #3
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    Has not set a "status"
     

    fdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    2,661
    Photos
    170
    I've spent quite some time inside a HazMat Level A suit using a liquid air SCBA. It was great - nice cool air to breathe, it was not a sauna inside the suit - plus your suit time became determined by your bladder and how many munchies you zipped up with.

    There was a lot of infrastructure to support the system that just doesn't exist in the regular world. Plus, you couldn't "store" the SCBA in a ready to us configuration, you had to fill it right before use.

    As nice as such a system would be for diving, until someone bites the bullet and has a cheap cryogen distribution system, I can't see it happening. Plus I recall the N2 % would vary a bit with boil-off, that would be an issue for deco.


    ...didn't really answer the question, sorry - I have NFI as to why it went nowhere.


    All the best, James
    James Flenner

    Finally, I found a quote that's worthy of a sig line snippet:

    "Deep Monterey diving is so beautiful it almost hurts." HBDiveGirl

  4. #4



    .
     

    Akimbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mendocino, California
    Dives
    5,000 - ∞
    Photos
    22
    Cryogenic distribution is not that big a deal. Every decent size hospital and welding operation gets LOX and a lot of industries use LN2. Mako had storage up to 6 days in 1967. The cost of infrastructure is probably less for a dive shop than an HP system. Large capacity units lose very little/day.

    All that was understood when these articles were written. It would be interesting to know why such a hyped project was so silently scuttled. Attached are scans from Skin Diver's December article.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Akimbo; July 4th, 2011 at 06:04 PM.

  5. #5



    .
     

    Akimbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mendocino, California
    Dives
    5,000 - ∞
    Photos
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by emoreira View Post
    …. He knew nothing about it, but the only point we discussed was the need of a different and very expensive production plant to fill tanks...
    There are plenty of industrial gas plants around the country producing LOX and LN2 now. They deliver bulk liquid to distributors who sell to hospitals and industrial consumers. These same plants produce HP oxygen, nitrogen, and argon through the same cryogenic systems that produces the LOX and LN2.

    All the dive shop would have to do is rent or buy two Dewar flasks for liquid Oxygen and Nitrogen to make any Nitrox mix or pure O2. Mixing is easier than for gaseous mixes than HP.

    We had 500 gallon Dewars of LN2 delivered offshore for the Helium reclaim systems. As I recall, it was much less expensive than HP Nitrogen. We used it as a refrigerant for a system that would precipitate all the other gases out leaving only pure helium (and trace amounts of hydrogen that may have entered the system). It took a lot less to train someone to safely use it than to maintain HP compressor systems.

    Quote Originally Posted by emoreira View Post
    …. Another point would be the cold air that the diver should breathe.
    As I understand it, it takes very little heat exchanger area to get the gas up to the water temperature. It might even be warmer than air in an HP cylinder at water temperature and expanded at the first stage.
    Last edited by Akimbo; July 4th, 2011 at 10:38 PM.

  6. #6
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    is alive
     

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    824
    Dives
    200 - 499
    they probably got deco sickness and didn't know why, thinking it was due to the liquid air.

  7. #7
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    is alive
     

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    824
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Ignore, duplicate post.

  8. #8
    Frequent Poster


    is doing more cold-water dives
     

    altaskier's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland, USA
    Posts
    316
    Dives
    100 - 199
    Given that the boiling point of oxygen is 90 Kelvin and nitrogen is 77 Kelvin, I would have thought that a cryogenic mixture of 21% oxygen and 79% nitrogen would lead to the following dive: first the oxygen boils off and you convulse from oxygen toxicity and die, and then the nitrogen boils off and you would die from hypoxia. I'd rather die zero times instead of two times during a dive...

    Of course this is a simplification and one would have to consider the relative vapor pressures of nitrogen and oxygen at 90 Kelvin... but air is a mixture not a compound...

  9. #9
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    is alive
     

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    824
    Dives
    200 - 499
    i thought the boiling point being different would be the case if you just let the liquid boil off and breathe it, but the gizmo drains off the liquid into a narrow tube and raises that liquid's temperature via heat transfer with the surrounding water. It will have warmed enough to the point that both oxygen and nitrogen has already evaporated and are near ambient temperature.

    The gizmo was probably too complicated that was trying to look for a problem to fix when there wasn't any. There is no need for a tank to hold more air than required for a single dive and this holds up to 5 hrs of air. One will hit NDL way before air runs out.

  10. #10
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Sat Diver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    India
    Posts
    171
    Dives
    5,000 - ∞
    Quote Originally Posted by altaskier View Post
    Given that the boiling point of oxygen is 90 Kelvin and nitrogen is 77 Kelvin, I would have thought that a cryogenic mixture of 21% oxygen and 79% nitrogen would lead to the following dive: first the oxygen boils off and you convulse from oxygen toxicity and die, and then the nitrogen boils off and you would die from hypoxia. I'd rather die zero times instead of two times during a dive...

    Of course this is a simplification and one would have to consider the relative vapor pressures of nitrogen and oxygen at 90 Kelvin... but air is a mixture not a compound...
    These problems are not that difficult to solve from an engineering standpoint.
    As Akimbo says, I'd be curious to know why it went under.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What happened to all the good scuba Podcasts?!?!?
    By Pseudocyber in forum Basic Scuba Discussions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: February 10th, 2012, 03:12 PM
  2. What happened to L.B.I. scuba ???
    By imukdiver in forum Wreck Valley
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: August 8th, 2008, 06:42 PM
  3. Hey!! What happened to HUE!?
    By k-valve in forum Texas Swamp Divers
    Replies: 163
    Last Post: May 13th, 2008, 07:26 PM
  4. What happened to Hammerhead scuba?
    By goodeatsfan in forum Q and A for Scuba Manufacturers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 24th, 2007, 08:29 AM
  5. Whatever happened to Coral Reef Scuba in Coral Springs?
    By nrh in forum Trips and Local Marketplace... Florida
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: July 18th, 2006, 08:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •