Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Results 1 to 3 of 3


  1. #1
    Regular of the Pub


    Has not set a "status"
     

    mbalmr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Michigan/Cincinnati
    Posts
    129
    Dives
    0 - 24
    Photos
    5

    Do you think recreational divers will get access to this?

    Just seen this on the news, it would be cool if this was a new dive for people on the peninsula.

    Monarch likely to remain in Cook Inlet

    by The Associated Press
    Sunday, March 22, 2009

    KENAI, Alaska -- The 166-foot supply vessel Monarch is likely to remain in Cook Inlet after its sinking near Nikiski.

    The Monarch sank Jan. 15 when sea ice pinned it against a platform operated by Chevron. Seven crew members were evacuated onto the platform and flown to shore by helicopter.

    An official with the boat's operator says it's been declared a total loss.

    And Jim Butler, a spokesman for Ocean Marine Services, says lifting it could prove dangerous to the nearby platform and to pipeline and communications infrastructure on the inlet bottom

  2. #2
    Stop, Think, Act!


    likes getting wet!
     

    RonFrank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Conifer, CO
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Photos
    196
    I hope that if they leave it there, they do what is necessary to make it as environmentally friendly as possible, and safe to dive. I know that before they sank such ships as the Orsky, and Spiegel Grove, The Bibb, etc., there was a LOT of cutting, insulation removal, battery removal, and all sorts of toxic removal done.

    Unfortunately this is expensive to do. My *guess* is that whom ever owns this ship will NOT bother unless forced. So it becomes dangerous to penetrate, and a toxic waste for years to come.
    Ron
    http://ronfrankweb.weebly.com/index.html
    Protect Florida's Precious BARRIER REEF! go HERE to Help
    My PBASE Gallery is HERE
    Looking for Used Gear, checkout SCUBA SITEMASH

  3. #3
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    covediver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    813
    Dives
    1,000 - 2,499
    Photos
    12
    No, at least now where it sits right now. Site conditions preclude diving by recreational divers in that part of the inlet. Ripping currents that move boulders the size of houses, near zero visibility, cold water, ice flows. Having spoken to commercial divers who service those pipelines and platforms, I doubt any recreational diver is qualified to dive on it.

    Now just the other day someone was mentioning to me about diving under the docks at Jakalof Bay over near Seldovia. While current can still be a problem there, it is manageable. That might be worth a recon this summer by water taxi out of Homer.
    Last edited by covediver; March 23rd, 2009 at 01:53 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •