"nitrox-ready" regs [Archive] - ScubaBoard - Scuba Diving Forum - Diving Social Network

View Full Version : "nitrox-ready" regs


Sponsored Link
haneym
August 22nd, 2005, 03:19 PM
hi all. got a question for ya about nitrox. i am not nitrox certified yet but plan to take the class when i have some free time that i want to spend in the class rather than water. when i am browsing around looking at regs, some say "nitrox ready" and some dont. what does this mean?? i have an older set of US Divers regs (conshelf se2 primary) that i am currently using because they were free. i would like to upgrade some time next year but was wondering if i can breathe nitrox off these or if i have to upgrade first. granted, i dont know much about nitrox as i havent taken the class yet so i apologize for that. i dont really know what having gear "o2 cleaned" means or why its needed, but im sure ill learn that in the class. i did a search and found a couple threads where some guys say that nitrox ready is just a marketing gimmick, is this true? thanks in advance

garyfotodiver
August 22nd, 2005, 03:26 PM
Two things. First, my Nitrox instructor and my SSI book mentioned the "40% rule". This simply means that, with gas mixtures up to 40% O, no special equipment preparation is needed. Remember, the two common Nitrox mixes are 32% and 36% O.

Second, the dive shop that services my 10 year-old Conshelf SE3 said that it is ready for Nitrox up to 40%.

Wayward Son
August 22nd, 2005, 03:27 PM
You can use most any reg for nitrox up to 40%. Over that it has to be O2 cleaned. You'll cover this in your class, but the short version is that at higher O2 percentages, things ignite a lot easier. If they do, they burn until either the fuel is gone or the O2 is gone.

But for rec diving on under 40%, most any reg will be fine.

MikeC
August 22nd, 2005, 05:01 PM
Hello Michael, back in the mid 90's all the way to the middle of year 2000
USD/Aqualung did not support the use of breathing air with a oxygen content
higher than 23.5% and it was even stated in the owners manuals. This was
primarily because of a lack of adiabatic testing to insure that the regs were
indeed safe to use. Fast forward to July 2000 and Aqualung had finished up
adiabatic testing (Very expensive) on all our current in-line regs and made the
necessary changes to insure their safe use out of the box to EAN 40% when
dedicated. None of the older regs will be tested in this manner and will more
than likely never be approved for anything other than use with air to 23.5%.

Sincerely,

Todd A.
Aqualung Repair Dept..

From Aqualung's service department. Dated May of this year. I'm not sure if that statement was based on the gear or what a lawyer told them to do.

ScubaSixString
August 22nd, 2005, 05:26 PM
hi all. got a question for ya about nitrox. i am not nitrox certified yet but plan to take the class when i have some free time that i want to spend in the class rather than water. when i am browsing around looking at regs, some say "nitrox ready" and some dont. what does this mean?? i have an older set of US Divers regs (conshelf se2 primary) that i am currently using because they were free. i would like to upgrade some time next year but was wondering if i can breathe nitrox off these or if i have to upgrade first. granted, i dont know much about nitrox as i havent taken the class yet so i apologize for that. i dont really know what having gear "o2 cleaned" means or why its needed, but im sure ill learn that in the class. i did a search and found a couple threads where some guys say that nitrox ready is just a marketing gimmick, is this true? thanks in advance


just completed nitrox certification. All modern regs are "nitrox ready" to 40% (the recreational limit) which means they can handle it. O2 servicing and cleaning is needed to use a mix higher than that. Any reg that you use with an air fill (that is not o2 compatible) will have to be at least cleaned again if not reserviced. O2 compatible air is not commonly used in an air fill. So unless you plan to dedicate that rig to nitrox, don't worry about its "nitrox ready" label. Nitrox ready might not even mean 02 serviced at all.

Tanks are a different matter. If 02 is put in at all (ie its not mixed outside the tank) you need to have an 02 cleaned and serviced tank. Same thing applies about using non o2 compatible air though

jmps
August 22nd, 2005, 05:55 PM
I read about people using air on some dives and nitrox on others on the same day. Are they just ignoring the cleaning rule between air and nitrox?

mossym
August 22nd, 2005, 06:01 PM
nope, you can put air in nitrox claen tanks as long as it is clean enough, grade e i believe

DA Aquamaster
August 22nd, 2005, 07:50 PM
From Aqualung's service department. Dated May of this year. I'm not sure if that statement was based on the gear or what a lawyer told them to do.It smells like a very conservative legal answer.

From a tech perspective, given that the Conshelf 14 is still produced and would be a current in-line reg and that SE whatevers are Conshelf derivatives with different port sizes and use Conshelf service kits, it would appear to be pretty safe to assume that a properly cleaned older Conshelf, Pro diver, SE whatever, etc first stage will work fine with nitrox as long as a new and current annual sercice kit is installed and all the old o-rings are replaced. After all, they are all using the same general design, chrome plated brass construction, o-ring and seat materials. But use your own judgement.

From the company attorney perspective, I suppose unless they can show definitive testing for a specific model that they could then use in court to show nitrox use was demonstrated to be safe in that particular model, (and therby inferring that the castastophy was due to the diver screwing up or doing something wrong to cause the accident) they are not going to ever say it is ok, as that would leave them open to liability.

rescuediver009
August 22nd, 2005, 09:53 PM
It is difficult to say whether your conshelf is Nitrox ready in its present state. Different service centres use different methods of lubrication etc when servicing regs. So I would be carefule and ask them on that.
As for a new reg, they are allok for up to 40% out ofthe box as they use the proper lubricants and assembly parts (nothing too fancy) to support this.
Also I think that taking the nitrox course will eliminate alot of confusion for you.

ScubaSixString
August 23rd, 2005, 12:47 AM
I read about people using air on some dives and nitrox on others on the same day. Are they just ignoring the cleaning rule between air and nitrox?


Its not a problem if they are using regs/tanks that aren't 02clean/serviced.

ALL recreational nitrox diving is done between 21 and 40% o2 (the most common blends being 32% and 36%). As long as the precentage of oxygen flowing through your reg doesnt exceed 40%, there is no need for o2 servicing and cleaning (although my instructor mentioned something about local laws in places may not allow it). Tanks can be a problem if the put in O2 first and then add air to make the blend (partial pressure blending) but your regs should be safe. In the case where a diver does a nitrox dive followed by an air dive (assuming the air isn't o2 compatible) 1 of 2 things occurs. Either the diver's equipment was not o2 clean and serviced.... or it loses its o2 rating and will have to reserviced.

ScubaSixString
August 23rd, 2005, 12:49 AM
It is difficult to say whether your conshelf is Nitrox ready in its present state. Different service centres use different methods of lubrication etc when servicing regs. So I would be carefule and ask them on that.
As for a new reg, they are allok for up to 40% out ofthe box as they use the proper lubricants and assembly parts (nothing too fancy) to support this.
Also I think that taking the nitrox course will eliminate alot of confusion for you.

Plus nitrox diving without certification is not too bright....

If you are able, it might be wise to take the nitrox cert before you buy. Or you can talk to your LDS about the purchase. (Although i had a lds employee tell me that regs with titianium in them couldn't be used for nitrox (i've never heard this since...anyone?) )

mossym
August 23rd, 2005, 12:52 AM
Plus nitrox diving without certification is not too bright....

If you are able, it might be wise to take the nitrox cert before you buy. Or you can talk to your LDS about the purchase. (Although i had a lds employee tell me that regs with titianium in them couldn't be used for nitrox (i've never heard this since...anyone?) )
titanium plus o2 can cause combustion...that may be what they were referring to

ScubaSixString
August 23rd, 2005, 01:23 AM
titanium plus o2 can cause combustion...that may be what they were referring to


But the 40% rule still applies? or no?

Hoosier
August 23rd, 2005, 01:37 AM
Still applied based on the manufacture statement. But, many divers mind it, specially in the tech market. So~~~~




But the 40% rule still applies? or no?

m3830431
August 23rd, 2005, 08:34 AM
[QUOTE=DA Aquamaster]It smells like a very conservative legal answer. [QUOTE]


The bottom line is if the manufacturer indicates the product is not EANx ready don't use it. It may be safe but why take the chance. Also it probably would void the warranty.

Since most regs are EANx ready use one that the manufacturer has approved. ;)

reefraff
August 23rd, 2005, 09:43 AM
nope, you can put air in nitrox claen tanks as long as it is clean enough, grade e i believeJust as a general guideline, anytime you have to qualify an answer with "I believe," you should probably be asking a question instead of making a statement, don't you think? This stuff can be dangerous and, in this instance, you're mistaken.


Grade "E" air is basic scuba air and should never be used in an oxygen clean cylinder - the permissible hydrocarbon content is too high and you can build up a residue of gunk that can catch fire when exposed to high pressure concentrations of high oxygen content gas. Modified Grade "E" (sometimes referred to as "hyperfiltered") air isn't an official standard, as defined by anybody other than the scuba industry, but it's well-known, nonetheless, and is generally considered to be acceptable for mixing with oxygen.

CGA Grade E Air Standard ("Filtered" Air)
For Filling Compressed Gas Containers Using Air.
• Oxygen: 20% to 22% (balance of gas predominantly nitrogen)
• Water vapor: May vary depending on intended use
• Condensed hydrocarbons: 5 mg/m 3
• Gaseous hydrocarbons (methane): 25 ppm
• Carbon monoxide: 10 ppm
• Carbon dioxide: 1000 ppm
• Odor: none
• Sampling Frequency: Quarterly
• Lab Analysis: Recommended

NAUI Modified CGA Grade E Air Standard ("Hyperfiltered" Air)
For Filling Compressed Gas Containers Using Air to Produce Nitrox or Oxygen-Enriched Gas Mixtures.
• Oxygen: 20% to 22% (balance of gas predominantly nitrogen)
• Water vapor:128 ppm (v/v) -40 ºF Dew Point
• Condensed hydrocarbons: 0.1 mg/m 3
• Gaseous hydrocarbons (methane): 25 ppm
• Solid particulate: none >2µm
• Carbon monoxide: 2 ppm
• Carbon dioxide: 500 ppm
• Odor: none
• Sampling Frequency: Quarterly
• Lab Analysis: Recommended

In my experience, which is to say I've got nothing to base this on other than a lot of training and experience diving and mixing scuba gases, regulators used in recreational nitrox do not need to be oxygen serviced or cleaned. So long as you never expose them to concentrations above 40%, you won't need to worry about fire in your regulator. It's hard to criticize those who want to err on the side of caution and use O2 compatible regulators that have been maintained for oxygen service, though.

If you are using O2 concentrations above 40%, you should have your regulators oxygen serviced and cleaned and you should never use them with mixes that aren't "hyperfiltered." I clearly mark mine and reserve them for use with EAN50 and pure oxygen mixes used for decompression.

Cylinders are different, due to mixing requirements. If you are buying "premix" nitrox in concentrations up to EAN40, no special cleaning or servicing is required. Slap that Nitrox sticker on your tank (or not) and you're ready to go. If, however, you will be partial pressure blending mixes in your cylinder or using them for mixes higher than EAN40, you need to have the tank and valve oxygen serviced and cleaned. Once this is done, you should only use hyperfiltered mixes in the tank and NEVER fill it with Grade "E" air.

My personal standard is that oxygen service and cleaning expires after one year and needs to be redone annually. Expensive, but I've seen what valves and first stages look like after oxygen fires - scary stuff.

As to Ti regulators, I wouldn't use them in mixes above normox, but I'm of the opinion that they are little more than an expensive marketing gimmick and find myself wondering how anybody gets...manipulated...into buying one in the first place.

jmps
August 23rd, 2005, 10:06 AM
Reefraff - Thanks for the very clear and informative posting!

msedivingdoc
August 23rd, 2005, 11:00 AM
[I]
Cylinders are different, due to mixing requirements. If you are buying "premix" nitrox in concentrations up to EAN40, no special cleaning or servicing is required. Slap that Nitrox sticker on your tank (or not) and you're ready to go. If, however, you will be partial pressure blending mixes in your cylinder or using them for mixes higher than EAN40, you need to have the tank and valve oxygen serviced and cleaned. Once this is done, you should only use hyperfiltered mixes in the tank and NEVER fill it with Grade "E" air.

My personal standard is that oxygen service and cleaning expires after one year and needs to be redone annually. Expensive, but I've seen what valves and first stages look like after oxygen fires - scary stuff.


I thought that to fill any tank with nitrox of any mix it had to be O2 cleaned and serviced. Also isn't it supposed to have the big freaking "NItrox" label? BTW I took the PADI course last month...I'm going back to reread it now.

Wayward Son
August 23rd, 2005, 11:06 AM
No, if it's pre-mixed, meaning the mix occurs outside the tank, then the tank doesn't have to be O2 cleaned for 40% or less.

None of my tanks are O2 clean, I dive nitrox all the time. It does mean that I can't get fills at a shop that blends inside the tank. So far not a problem, I have 2 shops that have nitrox banked where I normally get my fills.

mossym
August 23rd, 2005, 11:15 AM
Just as a general guideline, anytime you have to qualify an answer with "I believe," you should probably be asking a question instead of making a statement, don't you think? This stuff can be dangerous and, in this instance, you're mistaken.


Grade "E" air is basic scuba air and should never be used in an oxygen clean cylinder - the permissible hydrocarbon content is too high and you can build up a residue of gunk that can catch fire when exposed to high pressure concentrations of high oxygen content gas. Modified Grade "E" (sometimes referred to as "hyperfiltered") air isn't an official standard, as defined by anybody other than the scuba industry, but it's well-known, nonetheless, and is generally considered to be acceptable for mixing with oxygen.

CGA Grade E Air Standard ("Filtered" Air)
For Filling Compressed Gas Containers Using Air.
• Oxygen: 20% to 22% (balance of gas predominantly nitrogen)
• Water vapor: May vary depending on intended use
• Condensed hydrocarbons: 5 mg/m 3
• Gaseous hydrocarbons (methane): 25 ppm
• Carbon monoxide: 10 ppm
• Carbon dioxide: 1000 ppm
• Odor: none
• Sampling Frequency: Quarterly
• Lab Analysis: Recommended

NAUI Modified CGA Grade E Air Standard ("Hyperfiltered" Air)
For Filling Compressed Gas Containers Using Air to Produce Nitrox or Oxygen-Enriched Gas Mixtures.
• Oxygen: 20% to 22% (balance of gas predominantly nitrogen)
• Water vapor:128 ppm (v/v) -40 ºF Dew Point
• Condensed hydrocarbons: 0.1 mg/m 3
• Gaseous hydrocarbons (methane): 25 ppm
• Solid particulate: none >2µm
• Carbon monoxide: 2 ppm
• Carbon dioxide: 500 ppm
• Odor: none
• Sampling Frequency: Quarterly
• Lab Analysis: Recommended

In my experience, which is to say I've got nothing to base this on other than a lot of training and experience diving and mixing scuba gases, regulators used in recreational nitrox do not need to be oxygen serviced or cleaned. So long as you never expose them to concentrations above 40%, you won't need to worry about fire in your regulator. It's hard to criticize those who want to err on the side of caution and use O2 compatible regulators that have been maintained for oxygen service, though.

If you are using O2 concentrations above 40%, you should have your regulators oxygen serviced and cleaned and you should never use them with mixes that aren't "hyperfiltered." I clearly mark mine and reserve them for use with EAN50 and pure oxygen mixes used for decompression.

Cylinders are different, due to mixing requirements. If you are buying "premix" nitrox in concentrations up to EAN40, no special cleaning or servicing is required. Slap that Nitrox sticker on your tank (or not) and you're ready to go. If, however, you will be partial pressure blending mixes in your cylinder or using them for mixes higher than EAN40, you need to have the tank and valve oxygen serviced and cleaned. Once this is done, you should only use hyperfiltered mixes in the tank and NEVER fill it with Grade "E" air.

My personal standard is that oxygen service and cleaning expires after one year and needs to be redone annually. Expensive, but I've seen what valves and first stages look like after oxygen fires - scary stuff.

As to Ti regulators, I wouldn't use them in mixes above normox, but I'm of the opinion that they are little more than an expensive marketing gimmick and find myself wondering how anybody gets...manipulated...into buying one in the first place.
thanks for the correction, i always though grade e referred to hyperclean air.

question or statement, someone will always correct you on this board if you're wrong..;)

pants!
August 23rd, 2005, 11:18 AM
someone will always correct you on this board if you're wrong..;)
Well, the first half is accurate ;)

Hoosier
August 23rd, 2005, 12:14 PM
Reefraff---Well explained as a TDI Trimix blender......:)

msedivingdoc
August 23rd, 2005, 06:13 PM
Well, the first half is accurate ;)
:flame:
Actually by adding the "always" to the sentence, the statement is inaccurate. So therefore both of you are wrong. lol :59:

mossym
August 23rd, 2005, 06:16 PM
nope, you're wrong..and you've been corrected

so i was right!!

Sponsored Link

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1