mrjcrickett
December 9th, 2005, 05:39 PM
Hello everyone, I was wondering if one of you out there who was using the US4's on doubles would post up a pic of your hose routing. Thanks!
|
|
View Full Version : Apex US4 hose routing
mrjcrickett December 9th, 2005, 05:39 PM Hello everyone, I was wondering if one of you out there who was using the US4's on doubles would post up a pic of your hose routing. Thanks! mrjcrickett December 9th, 2005, 05:54 PM That is real weird. I typed "Apex" real fast....typed my question....saw that I did not type "Apeks" and re-typed the title...but it will not change...I look like a real dope! WarmWaterDiver December 9th, 2005, 07:58 PM It says "Apeks" in the title of post one while I'm viewing it. I can't answer your question though - I don't dive Apeks. You might drop a PM to rescuediver009 - check out his avatar. Meng_Tze December 9th, 2005, 08:07 PM I have not seen anyone dive these (either double or single). Tamas December 9th, 2005, 08:12 PM they are the same reg as the DS4 but unsealed - hence the "U" designation http://www.costablancascuba.com/dir/images/frontmain.jpg mrjcrickett December 9th, 2005, 08:27 PM Thanks Tamas. This is just what I needed. DS tank wipe December 10th, 2005, 01:14 AM You might drop a PM to rescuediver009 - check out his avatar. Hey he doesn t know everything;) I personally agree my avatar is much better:D Cheers Alex ps We are good friends thats why I make fun of him. GreenDiverDown December 11th, 2005, 11:32 AM If you plan to use Al cylinders it won't route as nice or look so pretty! JimC December 11th, 2005, 12:47 PM There is a trend in cave country to switch Hose #5 and Hose #1 these days. I don't do it, but I'm just puting it out there. cyklon_300 December 11th, 2005, 01:04 PM I have not seen anyone dive these (either double or single). routed as shown above in the previously posted photo.
Jason B December 11th, 2005, 01:31 PM What is the difference between the DS4 and the US4? Tamas December 11th, 2005, 02:05 PM What is the difference between the DS4 and the US4? Environmentally sealed VS unsealed......other than that identical . Tamas December 11th, 2005, 02:08 PM There is a trend in cave country to switch Hose #5 and Hose #1 these days. I don't do it, but I'm just puting it out there. Makes perfect sense, clean up the x-cross a bit better.....after all the hose configuration is not etched in stone, nor is there a "rule" of what has to be done.....do what works for you as long as you keep the primaries on separate posts. StSomewhere December 11th, 2005, 03:48 PM If you plan to use Al cylinders it won't route as nice or look so pretty!Because AL80s they are 7-1/4" diameters? Would it be worse still with 7" LP85s? GreenDiverDown December 11th, 2005, 06:41 PM Because AL80s they are 7-1/4" diameters? Would it be worse still with 7" LP85s? No... 'cause the aluminum cylinders have shorter necks than the steel tanks. As a result, you can't set the DS4s exactly even like shown in the pic above. The hoses coming off the "bottom" are forced into too tight a bend. Instead, you have to leave the first stages in a little bit of an angle... tilting in toward the center. Now the hoses come off at angle. This is O.K. but at its worst it can affect hose length. For instance, I have to use a slightly longer backup reg hose because it comes off the "bottom" of the first stage initially pointing to my left, then it must bend back towards my right so that it will go over my right shoulder. Hmm... I have some pics somewhere... I'll look. GreenDiverDown December 11th, 2005, 06:55 PM Here ya go... Tamas December 11th, 2005, 07:02 PM That's a horrible angle, what if you angle it more to relieve some of the strain....at times like this is when the DST would come in hand GreenDiverDown December 11th, 2005, 07:24 PM The first two pics show the "horrible" angle when the DS4s are forced into a flat or even position. The second two pics show a reasonable amount of bend when the first stages are tilted in a little bit. Unfortunately the way the second set of pics were taken, they don't show this very well. But that's typically how DS4s are used with the short neck aluminum cylinders... tilted in to relieve the tight bend in the Primary and SPG hoses. GreenDiverDown December 11th, 2005, 07:48 PM I should also point out that this appears to only be a problem when using a Halcyon/Sea Elite-type of manifold. I'd have to double check, but I seem to remember that my friends that use the OMS manifold don't have this problem. If I remember right the OMS sets the regs up a little higher. It really isn't a big deal... most people use 'em just like I've described. I was just pointing it out so guys that put this together won't be surprised at how it shapes up. Most pics floating around the web are of DS4s on steel twins... so it can be a bit of a surprise when you set 'em up with aluminum tanks. I think that I had to switch out my 22" backup reg hose to a 24" one. That was really the only problem. Jason B December 12th, 2005, 12:26 PM Makes perfect sense, clean up the x-cross a bit better.....after all the hose configuration is not etched in stone, nor is there a "rule" of what has to be done.....do what works for you as long as you keep the primaries on separate posts. While there are no 'rules', having them crossed keeps all your primary gear (primary reg and primary inflation - wing) on the right post and all redundant gear (back-up reg and back-up inflation - drysuit) on the left post.
JimC December 12th, 2005, 04:52 PM Makes perfect sense, clean up the x-cross a bit better.....after all the hose configuration is not etched in stone, nor is there a "rule" of what has to be done.....do what works for you as long as you keep the primaries on separate posts. The "normal/DIR" way alows you to shutdown your post while you dump your wing incase of a freeflowing inflator + iced up hose. Which is the main reason I don't switch. Tamas December 12th, 2005, 06:41 PM While there are no 'rules', having them crossed keeps all your primary gear (primary reg and primary inflation - wing) on the right post and all redundant gear (back-up reg and back-up inflation - drysuit) on the left post. That is the same thing I said in my post: "keeping your primaries on separate posts" The "normal/DIR" way alows you to shutdown your post while you dump your wing incase of a freeflowing inflator + iced up hose. Which is the main reason I don't switch. And how would that interfere if you switch your wing and DS inflator?! JimC December 13th, 2005, 02:54 PM And how would that interfere if you switch your wing and DS inflator?! You can't dump with your left hand while you shut down your post with you right hand if you switch them. Jason B December 13th, 2005, 03:20 PM That is the same thing I said in my post: "keeping your primaries on separate posts" That is not what I said at all. I said: having them crossed keeps all your primary gear....on the right post and all redundant gear on the left post. I have 2nd stages on both yes. Is that what you are calling primaries? I'm talking about your primary life support on one post...your main 2nd stage which is on a 7ft hose and your wing lp inflator. Redundant life support on a different post...necklace 2nd stage and dryduit inflator. wb416 December 13th, 2005, 05:36 PM That is not what I said at all. I said: having them crossed keeps all your primary gear....on the right post and all redundant gear on the left post. I have 2nd stages on both yes. Is that what you are calling primaries? I'm talking about your primary life support on one post...your main 2nd stage which is on a 7ft hose and your wing lp inflator. Redundant life support on a different post...necklace 2nd stage and dryduit inflator. Supposedly, in a "Roll-off; Break-off" situation involving the left post, what you describe leaves a working regulator (e.g. wing inflator) to still use during a donation situation. That's part of the thinking of leaving the wing inflation on the left/primary side. It would suck to be in that sitch, but gas from somewhere is better than nothing (or to keep you from fighting your buddy over the reg you donated him). :D
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1
|