Be Careful out there!

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Nitrox Junkie

Great Lakes diver
Messages
410
Reaction score
0
Location
I am originally from Michigan and now reside in In
# of dives
I just don't log dives
Seems that we have had another fatal case of the bends up in whitefish pt Lake Superior. The pair was diving the City of Superior which is in 260ft of water. One came up with little air remaining and the other had an air embolism and was retrieved by (ROV). Didn't really want to post this but just as a reminder; BE SAFE Jeff Greatlakes diver.
 
Garrett Weinberg died while diving on the Inspiration Rebreather, details are sketchy at this time.

ID
 
I've got a friend who Garrett instructed. By all accounts he was a great guy and a terrific instructor. Very sad...

---
Accident Report in Regard to Garrets Death
This is one of the rare times we have a detailed accident report to review:
Saturday June 23, 19:05, Garrett and Claudia started a dive to 300 feet at Mukilteo, WA. The dive included a swim of 15 minutes down a gradual slope to the planned 300-foot depth where 5 minutes were spent. The dive was planned
with software dive tables. Both knew the dive site very well.

Both were diving their inspiration units that had passed all pre-dive checks. Onboard tanks were full (8/60 and O2), scrubber fresh (see below). Also, they were carrying an Al80 (10/50) and an Al40 (O2) as bailout each, equipped with inflator hoses, gauges, and second stage. From descent to ascent, including the deep stops, everything went smoothly like usual.

After leaving the 100 ft stop to 60 feet (20 ft/min) Garrett started to display he was having a problem.

The Inspiration was functioning correctly and there were no PO2 problems, nor other CCR related problems. The after-market ADV was disengaged as it always was on ascent. No alarms, no malfunctions were taking place.

Claudia: Starting at 100 feet, he was suddenly behind me, not next to me or slightly in front. I looked back and saw him getting rid of occasional water in the breathing hose (normal, although he usually did not do it on ascent,
rather at the stop). He seemed to be struggling slightly with 'something'. (When someone had problems of any kind, they would stop and the buddy would stop as well. In this case, although slightly slower, Garrett did not stop,
and no other communication indicated a serious problem, yet.)

Claudia: Then, arrived at the 60 ft stop, the communication was strange to non-existent. All I understood, other than that he was getting in more and more distress, was that his dry suit was not as quickly deflated. He showed me that with opening the wrist seal slightly and bubbles coming out.
Because of the warm neck hood, it's very hard to open the neck seal that way, and Garrett chose not to. "

Garrett presented more problems with buoyancy and a look of distress, and surprise. After we had spent some time trying to stop the ascent by releasing gas and swimming down - I could not get to the dry suit inflator to detach it (although nothing indicated a runaway inflator) and
worked on the BC inflator - Garrett stopped kicking and continued to the surface. He was just floating up, looking down to me. That look said that he knew what was going to happen, and I did too."

(The longest deco in my life (60 minutes according to tables), on top a stomach barotrauma that made breathing very hard.)

Comment: This is what we actually talked about with Leon yesterday afternoon: Gary never really liked his deflator that does not have a rest when fully opened, and together with the undergarment, it seemed difficult to release the Argon in a timely manner. However, I have never seen
him having problems before.

According to a person at the surface that came to help, Garrett went to the boat ramp and climbed out of the water. He then collapsed on the boat ramp, and the guy pulled him from the ramp up.

Garrett said something about his dry suit to this person. He had him call 911, told him about his buddy doing deco and to take care of her, and had him help set up everything to breathe O2 until the ambulance would arrive.

He breathed oxygen until his onboard O2 was empty, and his stage / bailout O2 to 1700 psi by the time the ambulance arrived to pick him up.

(Throughout the dive an ordeal. There was no alarm or even 'sanity break' at any time. The scrubber was okay. Mine was new, his had 54 minutes on prior to the dive.)

(Tom's comment) I think it is important that he made a conscious decision not to descend back to his stop in the water and Garrett was fully aware of the problems with an explosive decompression, so it would lead one to think
other factors many be involved. He also had adequate OC gas to do a deco procedure, had OC gas been needed.

Claudia: We had talked about situations like that before and had he been able to, he would have resumed his deco after fixing whatever problem he had. I did not like the idea of leaving him alone when we discussed it, but
understand that otherwise we both would have been killed, and he never wanted that to happen. In a similar situation, knowing that we were close to the boat ramp on a Saturday evening with many people around, I would have expected for him to stay down as well. A hard decision I never wanted
to have to make.

At the hospital where he also commented about his dry suit and then fell unconscious after 5 minutes, due to his condition (good ECG at first, but a drop to 40 over 20) he was treated for a heart attack (while explosive
DSC is life threatening, it was secondary to the seriousness of the heart attack in the judgment of the attending physicians, and it is difficult if not
impossible to fully address the heart condition while in a chamber) for 5 hours prior to being placed in the chamber. 20 minutes into the chamber treatment Garrett arrested and died.

Tom: Garrett was a really good friend and his loss saddens me greatly. He had a tremendous amount of time on the inspiration (460 hours plus) and was the most active instructor we have had on the west coast. And maybe
the most active inspiration instructor in the USA. We have shared many dives, deep dives and recently he and Claudia went on a Blue Hole trip with several others and myself. He was extremely competent and safety orientated. In fact
during a training program when he was doing his IT and Martin was doing his instructors and Vicki her diver rating on the inspiration we hammered out sequencing. On the skills that are now taught in the IANTD Inspiration
course. So he has contributed very much to our training programs and to rebreather diving safety overall.

Patti, IANTD and I wish for Garrett the happiest after life possible and know his energy will always be with those he cared for.

From everything from observations to the medical reaction and diagnosis at he hospital it would have lead one to accept that Garrett had a heart attack.

True without the complication of an explosive decompression he may have had a higher probability of surviving.

BUT after his body was reviewed by the ME the following was found

Claudia: According to the examiner, no enzymes could be built within the time frame of 5-6 'alive' hours that would let trace a heart attack, and they were not found. The final report may be shared with me in about 6-8 weeks. This morning, two friends of ours, and students of Garrett's,
Ken Rymal and Dave Hancock, and I were explaining the gear to the examiners to shed some light for them on the subject. We tested the unit in front of them, and everything worked properly.

Garrett and I were to get married 5 July, and had many good plans for training and service, and just going diving all over the place. After talking to Leon that afternoon, we produced even more ideas while driving from the lunch place up North to Mukilteo. Except for the harsh and unfair
end, it was one of, of not the happiest weekend we had ever spent.

Tom: questions that remain:
1. What caused Garret to make the decision not to solve the problem in water (maybe due to physiological stress if fact he was having a physical problem
as thought by the doctors )
2. Why once on the surface he elected not to return to the stops after dealing with any other problems (again suggesting there was something else taking place)
3. Why was he not put in the chamber earlier, (as stated by the attending Doctor a heart attack but according to the ME no evidence of a heart attack

So we may or may not discover the answers to these as well as what if any role a problem with the dry suit may or may not have had on this accident.

We do know it was not CCR related. And it appears that there was a physiological problem taking place that influenced Garrett to allow himself to go to the surface and to elect not to return to decompression.
It is sad that he was not placed in the chamber immediately as that would have definitely increased the probability of his survival of the decompression issue. But the attending doctors (s) had to make a decision based on what they perceived to be most life threatening.

So we are still left with many questions

We do know Garrett was extremely competent as a diver and highly experienced on the inspiration

Respectfully
Claudia Milz and Tom Mount
==== End repost

Bill B
 
Probably not a good idea to cut and paste the followup to this thread on other boards -- a bunch of replies bashing IANTD, Weinberg himself, Inspiration rebreathers, lack of preparedness, and other subjects. Read for yourself.

One interesting point was made in the thread on Rodales that cited a lack of a deep dive support team as a contributing factor (i.e. divers at shallower depths monitoring the deeper diving divers). Sorta like those who assist in those deep freediving competitions. That one certainly makes sense.
 
Very sad...
Thanks for the post, Bill.
Rick
 
Claudia,

myself and other local divers share your pain, we wish the best for Gary.

Dane
 
Sounds like rec.scuba. One thing I don't get is why a lot of divers think that ALL diving accidents are ENTIRELY preventable. Other than obvious bone-headed stunts, you can take all the reasonable precautions necessary, and stuff still happens; equipment fails unexpectedly, fickle weather patterns appear, etc.

Originally posted by simonk999
Probably not a good idea to cut and paste the followup to this thread on other boards -- a bunch of replies bashing IANTD, Weinberg himself, Inspiration rebreathers, lack of preparedness, and other subjects. Read for yourself.

[snip]

 
Well Greg -

I think it has to do with the fact that humanoids believe they are better/stronger/smarter than anything out there...

If you read a little about the human mind it becomes rather clear that we do not regard the world as a hostile environment - rather as a place we have chosen to live - hence, people lack a fundamental respect for the ocean/mountains/moving vehicles and in general believe that no harm should come to a person no matter how stupid people are AND if harm come sto anyone - it is the familys fundamental right to sue the manufacturer of any and all equipment voluntarily used by the injured person who refused to get proper training...

In other words - welcome to America...

Phew - there - off my chest...

Dane
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom