What's wrong with older computers?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Isaac-1

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Messages
320
Reaction score
0
Location
SW Louisiana
Let me start by saying I have been diving using dive computers for 21 years, and am asking to get others thoughts on the subject. My first dive computer was a Suunto SME/ML that still works after numerous battery changes and that I usualy take along in my BCD pocket as a spare, my current computer is an 7-8 years old hoseless unit that does everything I need, still I may replace it in a couple of years. With the exception of Nitrox, and assorted bells and whistles (back lights, computer interfaces, etc.), is there any reason you see why someone could not routinely use an older (up to 20+ year old) dive computer for routine recreational diving on Air. This is assuming that the computer was a quality unit when new, and not one of those few specific models prone to failure.

Ike
 
When I started diving a friend of mine passed me his Suunto Octopus II it had 986 in the dive history counter. He said this will get you started. I have since bought a new fangled super duper Cochrane. I still use the Octopus when I dive air...I just like the simplicity it feels like an old piece of clothing, it also is more conservative when compared to most computers.
I am interested to see the response to this thread. Maybe it is time to put it on a shelf?
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom