Cheryl,
At least we agree in some areas.
"Boat handling is NOT a divemaster's primary job"
No arguments there. It is however a major part of a DM's job and should be included in the course. Even if you remove boat handling from the job description, lines and knots are still part of the job.
Divemaster to divers, "We'll be diving in strong current on this wreck today and will be using a tag line to prevent anyone from missing the dive. Who knows how to rig it? Lines and knots are not part of MY job."
Seriously Cheryl, I was a working divemaster for several years both on boats and off. I do understand the job.
Holding a US Coast Guard "Captain's" license is not part of the job and demonstrates no ability to handle boats, lines or knots. I picked up my master ticket in '87 without having to demonstrate anything except my ability to pass a written exam that had very little to do with the day to day operation of a vessel. When I was the on board captain, I needed a DM to handle other duties. The jobs are mutually exclusive.
"Not EVERY person performing the task of a divemaster does so on a boat, Walter. Just because it is common in YOUR LOCAL DIVE AREA does not mean it is the norm EVERYWHERE."
Very true, but all DM's should be able to act as a DM on a boat, on a beach with surf or in a quarry. You live in Atlanta, should you not be required to teach your students about diving in the ocean because there's no ocean "in YOUR LOCAL DIVE AREA"? I believe that would be very short sighted. We are all inclined to emphasize those aspects of a class we personally feel are more important or we believe the student is more likely to encounter, but we have an obligation to teach the entire course,
I have not engaged in agency bashing. Abby suggested switching to PADI for the DM course. I pointed out the reasons I didn't feel this would be a particularly
good idea. There are some real weaknesses in the PADI DM program. Anyone contemplating taking the class should be aware of those weaknesses. You believe those omissions are not necessary for DM's, you are certainly welcome to disagree and to state your case.
"Isn't it more constructive to build bridges through common goals rather than try to tear down someone else's house?"
I will work with anyone, regardless of agency affiliation, toward the common goal of excellence in dive education. When I see a poor job being done, I will point it out. If the goal is to get as many people diving as possible, it isn't a common goal. I know there are people in every agency who follow this same path.
I do not consider it tearing down someone's house when I point out a broken window, a leaky roof or a cracked foundation. I believe I have given that person an opportunity to fix the problem. If he places the house up for sale without fixing the problem, the problem should be disclosed to potential buyers.
Too often people try to cover up problems rather than working to fix them. I see problems in the Y program as well, but I'm trying to get changes made to fix those problems. In the meantime, if a question comes up about one of those areas, I'll be as open and critical of the YMCA program as I am of any other.
WWW