Which of the following is true:

Lawman · Jul 24, 2003

1. DIR followers are overly sensitive to any criticism no matter how mild;
2. DIR followers respond to any perceived slight with personal atttacks;
3. DIR followers have an exaggerated idea of their own diving skills;
4. DIR followers are condesending and insulting to "strokes."
5. DIR changes people's personalities for the worse;
6. None of the above;
7. All of the above.

Charlie99 · Jul 24, 2003

Lawman once bubbled...
1. DIR followers are overly sensitive to any criticism no matter how mild;
2. DIR followers respond to any perceived slight with personal atttacks;
3. DIR followers have an exaggerated idea of their own diving skills;
4. DIR followers are condesending and insulting to "strokes."
5. DIR changes people's personalities for the worse;
6. None of the above;
7. All of the above.

How about

1. DIR detractors are overly sensitive to any criticism no matter how mild.
2. DIR detractors respond to any perceived slight with personal atttacks;
3. DIR detractors have an exaggerated idea of their own diving skills;
4. DIR detractors are condesending and insulting to DIR "zealots".
5. DIR changes people's personalities for the worse;
6. None of the above;
7. All of the above.

Does "all of the above" apply to you Lawman.

Your post serves no purpose.

HammerNoMore · Jul 24, 2003

Lawman once bubbled...
1. DIR followers are overly sensitive to any criticism no matter how mild;
2. DIR followers respond to any perceived slight with personal atttacks;
3. DIR followers have an exaggerated idea of their own diving skills;
4. DIR followers are condesending and insulting to "strokes."
5. DIR changes people's personalities for the worse;
6. None of the above;
7. All of the above.

Actually it's option 8.

8. Lawman is a troll.

Doc Intrepid · Jul 24, 2003

Why would you even bother posting such an unintelligent and provocative post?

It makes you look like an idiot.

Lawman · Jul 24, 2003

Charlie99 once bubbled...
How about

1. DIR detractors are overly sensitive to any criticism no matter how mild.
2. DIR detractors respond to any perceived slight with personal atttacks;
3. DIR detractors have an exaggerated idea of their own diving skills;
4. DIR detractors are condesending and insulting to DIR "zealots".
5. DIR changes people's personalities for the worse;
6. None of the above;
7. All of the above.

Does "all of the above" apply to you Lawman.

Your post serves no purpose.

1,2, and 5. You've passed. You're DIR. Congrats!

Boogie711 · Jul 24, 2003

But I'm with Doc Intrepid. This post serves no useful purpose whatsoever. Lawman - that's just blatant trolling, and if you're not ashamed of yourself, you should be.

Can everyone please smarten up, give our collective heads a shake and mature a little bit?

Dryglove · Jul 24, 2003

Charlie99 once bubbled...
Your post serves no purpose.

Have they ever?

Lawman · Jul 24, 2003

I rest my case.

oversea · Jul 24, 2003

Not to change the subject, but what is meant by Troll or what is its significance. I see it all over.

Doc Intrepid · Jul 24, 2003

You have no "case" to rest.

A diver with your level of experience should have many meaningful things to say about any number of topics relevant to general diving.

If you wish to contribute input on a topic thats interesting, I'll respect what you have to offer.

Your question above was foolish, and it suggested that you had nothing more constructive to say about anything more interesting.

You're better than that.

Which of the following is true:

Please register or login

Lawman

Senior Member

Charlie99

Contributor

HammerNoMore

Contributor

Doc Intrepid

Contributor

Lawman

Senior Member

Boogie711

Guest

Dryglove

Contributor

Lawman

Senior Member

oversea

Guest

Doc Intrepid

Contributor

Similar threads