A question my husband raised made me think about this. A lot of the time, I think we choose our original OW instructors from a position of profound ignorance . . . we go with the shop that's close, or has a convenient schedule, and allow the original instructor to be assigned by the shop. But once you have taken a class, you have a better idea of what goes on, and when you do more classes, you are using SOME kind of database to decide with whom you want to train. And I wonder if people have thought about WHAT criteria they used, and have done the intellectual exercise to compare those choosing criteria with how the class turned out to meet their needs and expectations.
For me, OW was the shop near the house, and the instructor was assigned.
AOW was with the same instructor, because I liked him (for a long time) and I was afraid to dive by myself. I did a couple of specialties with him, too.
Nitrox was with NW Grateful Diver, because by that time, I had discovered that instruction could be quite different, depending on who taught the class and what their vision was.
Fundies was done blind. I had never met the instructor before the class. I took the class on the class's reputation, not his. He was new at teaching it, and did the best he could. It could have been better, but it was still good.
Rec Triox was with the same instructor as Fundies. He was better than anything else I had found. The class didn't go well -- there were issues I needed to fix he couldn't help me with.
Next, I took "diving lessons" which weren't a class and had no clear goal. I picked this instructor on HIS reputation; he was extremely good, but actually not ideal for me.
I took Cavern and Intro from an instructor based on a report from a former student. It was a good choice for the limited objectives I had for the class.
I took Cave by agency, and got instructor by lot. I could not have done better.
I took Tech 1 by instructor and agency, and got the excellent results I expected from both.
I took Cave 2 by agency and instructor reputation, and ended up with someone who didn't match my learning style at all.
So, looking back at the list, it appears to me that for ME, there's no clear guideline on how to be successful in instructor choice. Working with an instructor I knew personally worked very well. So did working with an instructor thrown at me at random through an agency. So did working with an instructor I knew personally, and whose agency (and therefore approach) I knew. Picking an instructor by agency has also NOT worked for me. Picking one by reputation has not worked for me.
So I come away without a clear idea of how one ought to go about choosing advanced instructors, although knowing them ahead of time seems to help. Anybody have a more intelligble track record?
For me, OW was the shop near the house, and the instructor was assigned.
AOW was with the same instructor, because I liked him (for a long time) and I was afraid to dive by myself. I did a couple of specialties with him, too.
Nitrox was with NW Grateful Diver, because by that time, I had discovered that instruction could be quite different, depending on who taught the class and what their vision was.
Fundies was done blind. I had never met the instructor before the class. I took the class on the class's reputation, not his. He was new at teaching it, and did the best he could. It could have been better, but it was still good.
Rec Triox was with the same instructor as Fundies. He was better than anything else I had found. The class didn't go well -- there were issues I needed to fix he couldn't help me with.
Next, I took "diving lessons" which weren't a class and had no clear goal. I picked this instructor on HIS reputation; he was extremely good, but actually not ideal for me.
I took Cavern and Intro from an instructor based on a report from a former student. It was a good choice for the limited objectives I had for the class.
I took Cave by agency, and got instructor by lot. I could not have done better.
I took Tech 1 by instructor and agency, and got the excellent results I expected from both.
I took Cave 2 by agency and instructor reputation, and ended up with someone who didn't match my learning style at all.
So, looking back at the list, it appears to me that for ME, there's no clear guideline on how to be successful in instructor choice. Working with an instructor I knew personally worked very well. So did working with an instructor thrown at me at random through an agency. So did working with an instructor I knew personally, and whose agency (and therefore approach) I knew. Picking an instructor by agency has also NOT worked for me. Picking one by reputation has not worked for me.
So I come away without a clear idea of how one ought to go about choosing advanced instructors, although knowing them ahead of time seems to help. Anybody have a more intelligble track record?