D7100 housing and lighting ideas.

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Trimix2dive

Contributor
Messages
228
Reaction score
1
Location
Arlington, TX
I know the camera doesn't even ship till 03.21.13, but who uses what for DX Nikon series? Just testing the water so to speak. Note - no underwater experience on photography or videography.
 
I've been using Ikelite housings and have been satisfied. I've never had a leak and the housing has performed flawlessly.
 
The standard setup for most people would be a metal housing (Nauticam, Aquatica, Sea&Sea etc) as well as a Nikkor 60mm or 105mm and Tokina 10-17mm. For lighting I think most people go with a YS-D1 or YS-01, DS161 from Ikelite is another common choice.
 
The Captain pretty much nailed it. Looks like Nauticam will be first out of the gate with a housing, then Aquatica and the rest on their heels. The only lens I would add might be the Sigma 17-70mm, and a Kenko 1.4 teleconverter for the excellent Tokina 10-17mm. I might skip the Ike 161 and just do the 160 and good focus/video/night dive light. While Ike makes great housings, at their price point, they do tend to limit lens choices a little.
 
Nauticam announced the NA-D7100 housing for the Nikon D7100 yesterday afternoon.

nau.17211_6.jpg


Ikelite announced their housing early April.
 
I would also go with the Captain on this one. I have dove with an Ikelite housing for a point and shoot and a Nauticam with a Nikon D7000. The Ikelite is a nice functional housing. The housing price is about half that of the Nauticam. But once you add ports, strobes, focus lights and so on, the price difference is not that much. The Nauticam is quite a bit superior to the Ikelite in precision of controls, and ergonomics. I was thinking of getting the Ikelite but my wife put in a big push for the Nauticam and she was right.

For lenses, the Captain is pretty much on target there too.

The Nikon 60 mm macro lens is good for medium fish and close ups. The focus distance is a bit too close to get true macro shots. You just can not get close enough to your subject to pull it off (usually). I would strongly recommend getting a focus light like the Sola.

The Nikon 105 macro lens is better suited for true macro because it allows some "stand off" distance. It is also probably reasonably good on small fish.

The Tokina 10-17 fisheye is a great underwater landscape lens and it is good for very large subjects who will let you get close. It has a really close focus which is great. The close focus allows you to use a very small dome which makes for a much more compact unit underwater. The lens also makes for nice shots on the boat coming back. The fisheye is forgiving of focus and the warped field of view makes for nice funky photos of people who have just been underwater for about an hour. I had not thought it would work that well in this application.

The last lens I would suggest is the Sigma 17-70 "macro" lens. It really is not a macro lens. It does allow close ups. But you really can not do small subjects justice. You can do landscapes in a pinch but not as well as the 10-17. The lens does work well on fish though. You have enough reach to get nice shots of grouper, angels and so on. Also the zoom allows you to zoom out on larger subjects. The lens does require at least a 6" dome or better yet a honking huge 8" dome to work well.

I use a mix of Ikelite 160 and 125 strobes. They work well for me. They are a bit heavy but they recharge great.

Something to think about. You will probably want to cram all of this into a carry on piece of luggage. The weight adds up. It is a bit of a haul. It can be done but it is a bit of a chore. Also, handling the thing on a boat is a bit cumbersome also. This isn't your point and shoot set up. Don't get me wrong, I really like it. But I don't mind the weight.

Also, given the fact that you are laying out this much $$$$$$, you might consider getting either the D800 or D600. The price of the system will not be that much different. You can use the 60 mm, the 105, and I have heard even the Tokina lens with the full frame versions. I have not considered what one could use for a mid range zoom with a full frame.
 
I received my D7100 last week along with the 105mm, 60mm and Tokina 10-17. I also threw in a 1.4 kenko TC.

Yesterday I put in my order for the full Nauticam system so hopefully I will receive it soon and begin testing. The whole setup wasn't cheap but I've been using my Oly e-520 for the last 4 years now and it was time for an upgrade. I'll probably keep the Olympus system as a backup as it does have some excellent glass in the 8mm fisheye and the 50mm macro.

I still plan on using my Olympus UFL-2 strobes with the system as I see myself doing mainly macro work and the zoomed flash on the Oly strobes is great for this.
 
The D7100 has a 1.3X Crop Mode. So, one 'could' argue to skip using the 1.4TC + Tokina 10-17mm and just use the Tokina alone in Crop Mode (and save the additional cost of the TC and port extension).

The downside is Crop Mode reduces the megapixel size from 24MP down to 15MP (which is still reasonable).
 
I had a play with the new camera yesterday using the 105mm with the 1.4TC. I then switched it to 1.3 crop mode.......wowzers :D. Will be interesting to see what adding the +10 subsee will do as well.
 
I had a play with the new camera yesterday using the 105mm with the 1.4TC. I then switched it to 1.3 crop mode.......wowzers :D. Will be interesting to see what adding the +10 subsee will do as well.

Looking forward to seeing some good stuff from your Anilao trip
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom