vicp
Contributor
Hi All (I have also posted this on the CDF forum).
I have been playing in a pool with the Hollis SMS 100 and a Gopro video camera trying to fine tune my configuration and have come to the conclusion that I do not like the SMS 100 buttplate. I really did not realize all that was going on until I started making short video clips (done about a dozen so far) after each change. I am trying to get a streamlined configuration or configurations to accommodate different scenarios (different cylinders and exposure suits). I highly recommend taking video of oneself if you have the equipment, it is truly eye-opening. You really look a lot lot different than you think you do. Video analysis is fairly prevalent in many sports.
Anyway, back to the SMS 100:
1) The buttplate/rails sit above (on top of) the wing, making for a fairly long back leash to drop the rear of the tanks to make them level and that also lets them rise quite a bit once the tanks (Fabers and AL80s) get light. If you try to do rolls, the tanks really flop all over the place. Most, if not all, of the other rigs - including the SMS 50 have their buttplates below the wing.
2) If clipped off to the rails (unless at the very bottom), the rear leash lies on or get impacted by the wing. Even Edd's mod of placing the Dive Rite door handles up higher puts the leashes down the widest part of the wing. Wing inflation then changes the tank position and trim.
Looking at videos of people diving the SMS, a lot of them seem to have the tails high vs. the valves. Many also have the rear leash at an angle to the rear (trying to get to tanks forward for trim?), requiring an even longer length to not raise the tails.
What I am looking for is an easier way to get the tanks in line with my body without lengthening the back leash even more. I do have the valves fairly high - almost stuffed into my armpits. What I am looking for is the tank trim I see in Steve Bogaerts' videos - I realize he uses AL80s and clips off at the waist.
My question is to all you SMS 100 users, including those that swear by Edd's mods (I have incorporated most if not all of them at one time or another with varying levels of success), do you have any of the issues listed above with the use of the SMS 100 buttplate? Have any of you given up on that buttplate and simply gone to waist belt ring attachment (for steel tanks?) or modified the rig (a different buttplate/butterfly - under the wing) in other ways?
I think that I am going to try clipping to the waist belt or some other arrangement under the wing. After looking at a dozen or more video clips, I really do not like the buttplate setup on the SMS 100. I may even try to either modify the harness or make a Razor-like clone using the SMS wing (I have the Highseas Millworks hardware).
Thanks for any input.
I have been playing in a pool with the Hollis SMS 100 and a Gopro video camera trying to fine tune my configuration and have come to the conclusion that I do not like the SMS 100 buttplate. I really did not realize all that was going on until I started making short video clips (done about a dozen so far) after each change. I am trying to get a streamlined configuration or configurations to accommodate different scenarios (different cylinders and exposure suits). I highly recommend taking video of oneself if you have the equipment, it is truly eye-opening. You really look a lot lot different than you think you do. Video analysis is fairly prevalent in many sports.
Anyway, back to the SMS 100:
1) The buttplate/rails sit above (on top of) the wing, making for a fairly long back leash to drop the rear of the tanks to make them level and that also lets them rise quite a bit once the tanks (Fabers and AL80s) get light. If you try to do rolls, the tanks really flop all over the place. Most, if not all, of the other rigs - including the SMS 50 have their buttplates below the wing.
2) If clipped off to the rails (unless at the very bottom), the rear leash lies on or get impacted by the wing. Even Edd's mod of placing the Dive Rite door handles up higher puts the leashes down the widest part of the wing. Wing inflation then changes the tank position and trim.
Looking at videos of people diving the SMS, a lot of them seem to have the tails high vs. the valves. Many also have the rear leash at an angle to the rear (trying to get to tanks forward for trim?), requiring an even longer length to not raise the tails.
What I am looking for is an easier way to get the tanks in line with my body without lengthening the back leash even more. I do have the valves fairly high - almost stuffed into my armpits. What I am looking for is the tank trim I see in Steve Bogaerts' videos - I realize he uses AL80s and clips off at the waist.
My question is to all you SMS 100 users, including those that swear by Edd's mods (I have incorporated most if not all of them at one time or another with varying levels of success), do you have any of the issues listed above with the use of the SMS 100 buttplate? Have any of you given up on that buttplate and simply gone to waist belt ring attachment (for steel tanks?) or modified the rig (a different buttplate/butterfly - under the wing) in other ways?
I think that I am going to try clipping to the waist belt or some other arrangement under the wing. After looking at a dozen or more video clips, I really do not like the buttplate setup on the SMS 100. I may even try to either modify the harness or make a Razor-like clone using the SMS wing (I have the Highseas Millworks hardware).
Thanks for any input.