Charlie99
Contributor
- Messages
- 7,966
- Reaction score
- 166
- # of dives
- 500 - 999
In another thread it has been posted that the ascent method taught in DIR-F course and supplemental materials is a series of 1 minute stops starting at 80%max ata / 75% max depth , including just 1 minute at 20' and 10'.
OTOH, the Minimum Deco Tables at www.dir-diver.com use (for all depths and times) a standard set of stops of
1 minute at 40'
1 minute at 30
3 minute at 20'
3 minute at 10'
The same GUE-trained individual that posted the linear ascent method also says that the dir-diver tables are not considered the DIR approach to minimum deco.
It appears to me that the series of 1 minute stops at all depths is an approximation of a 10fpm linear ascent, while the dir-diver.com stops are more in line with an efficient "shape of deco" ascent.
What really is being taught in DIR-F for the optimum ascent profile?
Do different instructors teach different methods?
What is the concensus as the better ascent profile?
OTOH, the Minimum Deco Tables at www.dir-diver.com use (for all depths and times) a standard set of stops of
1 minute at 40'
1 minute at 30
3 minute at 20'
3 minute at 10'
The same GUE-trained individual that posted the linear ascent method also says that the dir-diver tables are not considered the DIR approach to minimum deco.
It appears to me that the series of 1 minute stops at all depths is an approximation of a 10fpm linear ascent, while the dir-diver.com stops are more in line with an efficient "shape of deco" ascent.
What really is being taught in DIR-F for the optimum ascent profile?
Do different instructors teach different methods?
What is the concensus as the better ascent profile?