Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26


  1. #21
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    AzAtty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    893
    Now you know why it's called decompression THEORY.

    Haldanean models assume that all gas is dissolved. In that sense, a Haldanean model is a "single phase" model. Bubble models attempt to explain not only elimination of dissolved inert gas, but also the elimination of the "free phase" (undissolved inert gas bubbles). Bubble mathematics are significantly more complicated.
    And the moral of the story is ... beware of scuba divers wearing only one shoe.
    -NWGratefulDiver

    Instead of spending all this time trying to solve a non existing problem, why not work at being smarter divers, don't do stupid stuff at the lakes and the boats will have a much harder time hitting you. (AZTEK DIVER)

  2. #22
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    Has not set a "status"
     

    gcbryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Dives
    1,000 - 2,499
    Photos
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by AzAtty View Post
    Now you know why it's called decompression THEORY.

    Haldanean models assume that all gas is dissolved. In that sense, a Haldanean model is a "single phase" model. Bubble models attempt to explain not only elimination of dissolved inert gas, but also the elimination of the "free phase" (undissolved inert gas bubbles). Bubble mathematics are significantly more complicated.
    I understand that (or rather I understand that the math is much more complicated...not that I completely understand it) but am I correct in thinking that bubble models still consider ongassing and offgassing rates as being the same?

  3. #23
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Sloth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Delaware, Ohio
    Posts
    489
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Photos
    12
    I heard someone say the other day that the problem with decompression models is they are looking for a digital solutions to an analog problem. Probably not accurate at all but thought it sounded good

  4. #24
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    AzAtty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    893
    Quote Originally Posted by gcbryan View Post
    I understand that (or rather I understand that the math is much more complicated...not that I completely understand it) but am I correct in thinking that bubble models still consider ongassing and offgassing rates as being the same?
    Not necessarily.

    Tissue ongassing and offgassing of the dissolved gas phase is modeled as an exponential equation in the bubble models such as VPM and RGBM. So to that extent, yes, ongassing and offgassing "rates" are modeled by the same type of equation (differences in halftimes and other variables in each equation will, of course, affect the result).

    However, bubble models assume that an exponential distribution of bubble "seeds" is excited to growth by compression and decompression. As I understand it, the goal of a bubble model is to control the volume of the bubbles ("phase volume limit point")--if they get too big, we have problems.

    It has been suggested that once the free phase (bubbles) exists in the circulatory system, the uptake and elimination process for the dissolved phase becomes asymmetric. The halftime for elmination may need to be lengthened (relative to the uptake halftime) or the equation changed, e.g. an exponential formula for uptake, and a linear formula for elimination. The idea is that the presence of the free phase gradient during elimination "competes" with the dissolved gradient, so elimination would have to be weighted in proportion to the amount of separated gas.

    EDIT: I neglected to insert my standard disclaimer that my doctorate isn't in hyperbaric medicine, so I welcome corrections to any inaccuracies.
    Last edited by AzAtty; July 10th, 2009 at 12:54 PM.
    And the moral of the story is ... beware of scuba divers wearing only one shoe.
    -NWGratefulDiver

    Instead of spending all this time trying to solve a non existing problem, why not work at being smarter divers, don't do stupid stuff at the lakes and the boats will have a much harder time hitting you. (AZTEK DIVER)

  5. #25
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    Has not set a "status"
     

    gcbryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Dives
    1,000 - 2,499
    Photos
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by AzAtty View Post
    Not necessarily.

    Tissue ongassing and offgassing of the dissolved gas phase is modeled as an exponential equation in the bubble models such as VPM and RGBM. So to that extent, yes, ongassing and offgassing "rates" are modeled by the same type of equation (differences in halftimes and other variables in each equation will, of course, affect the result).

    However, bubble models assume that an exponential distribution of bubble "seeds" is excited to growth by compression and decompression. As I understand it, the goal of a bubble model is to control the volume of the bubbles ("phase volume limit point")--if they get too big, we have problems.

    It has been suggested that once the free phase (bubbles) exists in the circulatory system, the uptake and elimination process for the dissolved phase becomes asymmetric. The halftime for elmination may need to be lengthened (relative to the uptake halftime) or the equation changed, e.g. an exponential formula for uptake, and a linear formula for elimination. The idea is that the presence of the free phase gradient during elimination "competes" with the dissolved gradient, so elimination would have to be weighted in proportion to the amount of separated gas.

    EDIT: I neglected to insert my standard disclaimer that my doctorate isn't in hyperbaric medicine, so I welcome corrections to any inaccuracies.
    So the answer is actually yes.

  6. #26
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    AzAtty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    893
    I think the answer is actually yes...and maybe no.

    In the bubble models that treat dissolved and free phase gas: for dissolved inert gas, the answer is "yes"; for bubbles, I think the answer is "maybe no."
    And the moral of the story is ... beware of scuba divers wearing only one shoe.
    -NWGratefulDiver

    Instead of spending all this time trying to solve a non existing problem, why not work at being smarter divers, don't do stupid stuff at the lakes and the boats will have a much harder time hitting you. (AZTEK DIVER)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •