Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25


  1. #1
    ScubaBoard Supporter
    Go Red - Support SB!

    Has not set a "status"
     

    NJMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Northwest NJ
    Posts
    586
    Dives
    100 - 199
    Photos
    12

    Pros/cons of weight integrated BC vs weight belts

    I'm a newbie...

    Trying to figure out the pros and cons of getting a weight integrated BC or using a weight belt.

    The first thing I can think of is taking the BC off underwater...in the case of entanglement perhaps.

    Wouldn't it be a little difficult to remain down in this situation?

  2. #2
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    REEFRASCAL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    12
    Dives
    50 - 99
    I have used both but I ended up buying a weight integrated BC. I love it. Having a weight belt sitting on my hips bugs me, it always seems to loosen and move around during the dive. Just one more thing to mess with instead of enjoying the scenery. As for the entanglement, I suppose if you got into trouble you could remove your dumpable weights and carry those with you.
    Always havin a good time
    REEFRASCAL

  3. #3
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denver area
    Posts
    326
    Dives
    100 - 199
    I've used several brands and types. I prefer a weight integrated back floater for comfort above and below water. They travel well too.

    My brand preference is Zeagle, they arn't the only game in town, but they provide a+ service, secure weight system that is "fool proof", and modular sizing.

    There ara a lot of BP/W users on the board who are sure to chime in....Very popular on scubaboard, but may be uncommon where you dive, not to say that a BP/W is not a good system.

    Look around your area, see what divers are using, ask questions and try some diferent rigs on, dive them if you can, then make your choice.

  4. #4
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Noviz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Wetchester County, New York, USA
    Posts
    94
    Dives
    50 - 99
    Hi... when I dive, I use both. In the first place, I dive with a ton of neoprene (6.5 mil XXXL), so I dive heavy. Some in the BC, some on the waist. There are a bunch of reasons. First: the weight belt no longer has to be ditchable, so I wear suspenders. Makes the slipping down problem go away. If I need to ditch weight fast, I can drop the BC pockets. If I have time, I can open the pockets and drop the lead. (New pockets are expensive). Second: neither the BC or the belt are stoopid-heavy. Third: if the need arises to remove the BC underwater (entanglement), neither I nor my air take off on a free ascent. Finally, I spread the weight around better for trim purposes.

  5. #5
    Dive Bum Wannabe
    Go Red - Support SB!

    is Ready to Dive
     

    spectrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Atlantic Northeast (Maine)
    Posts
    9,657
    Dives
    500 - 999
    Photos
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by NJMike
    I'm a newbie...
    The first thing I can think of is taking the BC off underwater...in the case of entanglement perhaps.

    Wouldn't it be a little difficult to remain down in this situation?
    You are absolutely correct, especaily if much neoprene is involved. And don't think a reason to do so is obscure. Not frequent but worth being prepared for.

    Here is a recent thread including some posts I made:
    http://www.scubaboard.com/showthread.php?t=157719

    Pete
    My ever growing collection of assorted ramblings on scuba topics can be read here.

    No sequence of classes will make a good diver out of you, if you aren't actively diving and practicing in the meantime.
    TSandM

  6. #6
    ScubaBoard Veteran


    Has not set a "status"
     

    PerroneFord's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Borg Cube
    Posts
    6,024
    Dives
    None - Not Certified
    Photos
    25
    I prefer a weightbelt for this as well as other reasons.
    Gear questions answered Here

    Why DIR? Because pushing rocks uphill gets old quickly.

    Resistance is futile...

  7. #7
    Assimilated Medical Mod


    is dreaming of better viz . .
    .
     

    TSandM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Woodinville, WA
    Posts
    27,014
    Dives
    500 - 999
    Photos
    27
    Blog Entries
    1
    The first thing is to put weight where your static balance permits a horizontal diving posture. That may be possible with weight integration, especially if the BC has trim weight pockets in the back, or it may not be.

    The second thing is to put weight where it is comfortable and manageable.

    For me, both things mandate a weight belt. I do poorly with weight hung from my shoulders, and my trim is better if the weight is down on my waist. It also makes the rig easier to move around. For the same reason, I am avoiding a V-weight with my doubles.
    "
    "we do what is recommended unless what is recommended doesn't make sense. Then we do something else." Anonymous GUE instructor . . .


    My dive journal can be read here, and a current dive blog HERE
    Okay, you've heard all our opinions. Want to know what the science is? http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/
    www.divematrix.com

  8. #8
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    owns the foreshore
     

    Packhorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    20 meters below Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    1,744
    Dives
    500 - 999
    I prefer a belt when diving a single tank. Mainly due to having myself and my rig both neutrally bouyant but also to have less hanging on my BP/W.
    With doubles I dont get much choice. I dont need any weight. If I could swap my tanks for lighter ones at no cost I would just so I could have some weight on a belt to keep me and my wetsuit neutally bouyant.

  9. #9
    ScubaBoard Supporter
    Go Red - Support SB!

    Has not set a "status"
     

    NJMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Northwest NJ
    Posts
    586
    Dives
    100 - 199
    Photos
    12
    Interesting, I thought the comments would favor the weight integrated BC, but it doesn't seem so.

    If I can find a buddy to go diving with next weekend, I am planning on renting the entire setup from my LDS to try out - the W/I'd BC, reg, octo, gauges...that I'm thinking about purchasing. Since the BC has the weights, I'll get to try it out. And if too much neoprene becomes an issue for the weights...the BC holds up to 20 lbs...guess I could always get one of those soft belts (which I have never used either).

    Thank, all.

  10. #10
    ScubaBoard Veteran


    Has not set a "status"
     

    PerroneFord's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Borg Cube
    Posts
    6,024
    Dives
    None - Not Certified
    Photos
    25
    I think many people who've taken a good look at weighting, and WHY it's there, have come to the realization that a weight integrated BC is really not the best solution.

    If you get your rig set up so it's balanced in the water, and weight the diver so that they are neutral in the water, it only requires carrying enough weight to account for the swing of the weight of the gas.

    In my case, my rig is negative enough, so that I don't need weights at all. I am slightly positive, my rig is slightly negative. If we need to part ways in the water, I won't become a rocket, and my rig will sink slowly.

    With weight integrated, the same scenario would make me a missle, and my rig an anchor. Not where I want to be.

    Of course, the other issue is that I don't really like BCs
    Gear questions answered Here

    Why DIR? Because pushing rocks uphill gets old quickly.

    Resistance is futile...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Weight Integrated BC AND a weight belt?
    By stevetim in forum Buoyancy Compensators (BC's) and Weight Systems
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: September 13th, 2006, 01:33 AM
  2. Weight Integrated safer than weight belt?
    By teamgs in forum Buoyancy Compensators (BC's) and Weight Systems
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: April 1st, 2006, 04:55 PM
  3. Pros and cons of integrated BC
    By alhatten in forum Buoyancy Compensators (BC's) and Weight Systems
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: August 4th, 2005, 09:39 AM
  4. Integrated weight system or weight belt???
    By blacksabbath in forum Buoyancy Compensators (BC's) and Weight Systems
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: July 26th, 2004, 09:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •