Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
1) You need a longer potentially dangly corrugated hose
2) If your inflator malfunctions and you disconnect you lost both your inflator and back up reg
3) If your back reg freeflows and you disconnect you lost both your back up reg and power inflator
4) Air share ascents can be complicated by the need to breath from and manage the buoyancy of two divers using the same device. (You practice these right??)
Tobin
Why is it that every time someone asks how, not if they should, put an integrated on their BC, the thread has to turn into a soapbox for people to give their personal opinion on why they believe that an integrated is the worst or best invention ever. Why not save that for the threads that actually ask whether or not they should use an integrated (of which there are hundreds on SB)? While the debate may be a valid one, and it is most certainly a passionate one, it does nothing to help answer the Op's question(s). And more often than not, turns what would've been a great thread with a lot useful info, into a useless mudslinging contest that no one looking for an answer would want to wade through. I mean no offense by this, and I'm not advocating a side, one way or the other. I'm just saying that maybe there's a better thread to try and convince people of your position on integrated octo/inflaters.
Why is it that every time someone asks how, not if they should, put an integrated on their BC, the thread has to turn into a soapbox for people to give their personal opinion on why they believe that an integrated is the worst or best invention ever. Why not save that for the threads that actually ask whether or not they should use an integrated (of which there are hundreds on SB)? While the debate may be a valid one, and it is most certainly a passionate one, it does nothing to help answer the Op's question(s). And more often than not, turns what would've been a great thread with a lot useful info, into a useless mudslinging contest that no one looking for an answer would want to wade through. I mean no offense by this, and I'm not advocating a side, one way or the other. I'm just saying that maybe there's a better thread to try and convince people of your position on integrated octo/inflaters.
Pretty simple really.
Adding a combo octo -Inflator modifies a BP&W in ways that reduce some of the advantages a BP&W offers.
I'd tell the same thing to somebody that does not now own a pickup truck, but plans on buying one and adding a lift kit, skid plates and monster tires, i.e. why not try unmodified first?
Donut wings are good- oxycheq also has a nice singles wing.
If you plan to get into cave diving an aluminum backplate might be something you want instead of stainless steel. If not, ss will probably meet your needs the best.
Why is it that every time someone asks how, not if they should, put an integrated on their BC, the thread has to turn into a soapbox for people to give their personal opinion on why they believe that an integrated is the worst or best invention ever.<SNIP> I'm just saying that maybe there's a better thread to try and convince people of your position on integrated octo/inflaters.
In this case, the OP is a very experienced diver. But in many cases where the question is posed, the diver is in the 0-24 category and diving in cold water with a wetsuit Somebody is trying to talk them into making a mistake (in my view) because, for cold water wetsuit diving, the device doesn't make any sense.
Tobin spent about 5 seconds pointing out why I should ditch the one I had on my BC for over 20 years. Sure, it worked ok in warm water where buoyancy doesn't change much from top to bottom. But, as breathing from a BC is usually a bad idea, trying to vent your BC with the device in your mouth is an equally bad idea. Any other venting tactic with the device is equally bad for a 0-24 diver. Rescue techniques are something that needs consideration.
At least that's why I mention it from time to time.
Richard.
Last edited by rstofer; August 7th, 2009 at 03:39 PM.
Reason: typo
Why is it that every time someone asks how, not if they should, ...... the thread has to turn into a soapbox for people to give their personal opinion
Because threads are discussions. The OPs usually get their questions answered and then the benefit of alternative viewpoints and suggestions.
For instance..... if a newbie diver posted a thread asking "how do I fill my cylinders from my car exhaust", I would not expect many replies describing a process to do that.... but I would expect some prudent advice and discussion on the correct method to safely fill a cylinder for diving.....
Thanks for the input everyone-Yes, I know the advantages/disadvantages to the air 2 and I do practice with it and find that it works for me. As for the BP/W, I will probably see if I can rent one somewhere first before buying - if that's possible.
Because threads are discussions. The OPs usually get their questions answered and then the benefit of alternative viewpoints and suggestions.
For instance..... if a newbie diver posted a thread asking "how do I fill my cylinders from my car exhaust", I would not expect many replies describing a process to do that.... but I would expect some prudent advice and discussion on the correct method to safely fill a cylinder for diving.....
Sure, that might work great for you guys with a V-8 but my little Miata can barely produce 1500 PSI at 7000 rpm.
While the debate may be a valid one, and it is most certainly a passionate one, it does nothing to help answer the Op's question(s). And more often than not, turns what would've been a great thread with a lot useful info, into a useless mudslinging contest that no one looking for an answer would want to wade through.
This is why. This topic rarely (if it ever has) does anything other than result in ridiculous statements, name calling, and bickering. And why I recommend they be directed toward one of the many threads already out there on the topic.
Originally Posted by DevonDiver
Because threads are discussions. The OPs usually get their questions answered and then the benefit of alternative viewpoints and suggestions.
For instance..... if a newbie diver posted a thread asking "how do I fill my cylinders from my car exhaust", I would not expect many replies describing a process to do that.... but I would expect some prudent advice and discussion on the correct method to safely fill a cylinder for diving.....
If you're implying that the use of an integrated inflater/octo is as dangerous and stupid as filling your scuba tank with with a toxic gas, you've just illustrated my point.
If you're implying that the use of an integrated inflater/octo is as dangerous and stupid as filling your scuba tank with with a toxic gas, you've just illustrated my point.
I wasn't. It was just a (tongue-in-cheek) analogy to illustrate the benefits of discussion, where side-issues may be raised that contribute to the overall topic.
Quite often, people with limited diving experience can fail to see the bigger picture and there is some benefit to be drawn from the experiences of others.
Novice divers, in the 50-200 dive bracket, tend to get settled with an equipment configuration, but have yet to gain the experience to fully appreciate the problems that may still be inherent with that configuration, or the refinements that could be made to it.
In this instance, the OP raised a question about the selection of a BP/W. He mentioned using an AIR2. Given that an AIR2 is a component within the BP/W, other users have expressed their opinions on how that equipment choice could be improved, whilst also quoting reasons why an AIR2 may not be the optimum choice for use with a BP/W. As such, they seem valid contributions to the thread.
*please note, I have yet to display any personal opinions on the use of AIR2...I am only noting the validity of sharing our personal opinions and experiences (if justified) for the benefit of the initial debate.