Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers diving from around the world. If the topic is related to scuba diving, this is the place to find divers talking about it. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
Find a dive buddy or communicate directly with scuba equipment manufacturers.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
I just order my first bq+w setup. SS back plate 30lb wing. Now I have doubt, I wonder if 30 will be good enough, or should I call and change to 40 for more margin. Can cold water driver comment?
Here is what I have been diving with: AL80, 7mm farmer john + 7mm jacket. 20lb weight belt. SeaQuest ProDQ BCD with 10lb intergrated.
Will I be OK with 30lb wing? What if I decide to take a smaller camera (canon G9 in underwater housing) and a small light with me (UK SL4 or similar). Would I still be OK? How about with a steel tank?
I used a 40lb Halcyon Eclipse when I dived in the UK...complete with steel 15l and 3l tanks, umbilical torch etc. I never used the full capacity.
From your stated configuration, you will be borderline with your requirement. Having said that, your weighting seems pretty heavy.
Underwater, with the correct weighting, you shouldn't need to add much air to the wing - only a couple of lbs too offset the weight carried to compensate for the increasing bouyancy of your tank as the dive progresses. So, in theory, the only requirement is for surface support.
This is why I am having doubt. Everyone I spoke to, said that I am over weighted. I want to test it out, but I cannot until I get everything together. And once I tested it in water, I don't think I can return the 30lb for a 40lb.
Can come one, if possible, tell me for sure I would be OK with 30lb??? BTW, I am 5'6", no more than 140lb.
First, I'm happy with 30lbs, steel backplate, 15L steel tank, two first stages on a H valve and 6.5mm suit. Because my tank is very heavy (18 kg empty), I only use 3kg of weights.
You are using AL tanks. They are slightly negative when full, and very buoyant when empty. My 30lbs wing floats easily a 15L steel tank, with two first stages on it, so your AL should not be an issue for floating the rig.
The second purpose of the wing is to compensate for wetsuit buoyancy loss with depth plus the air your are carrying at the begining of the dive. You carry about 2.71 kilograms of air in AL 80.
The only unknown is the buoyancy of your wetsuit. Enter with the wetsuit (plus gloves and boots) in water - without the scuba rig, and establish its weighting (how much weight is required so with average-filled lungs you float, and you sink when you exhale. In my case this value was 8-9kg. Added with 3.6kg of air, it meant 12.6 kg (27lbs), so the 30lbs wing was enough. Keep in mind that your wetsuit will never lose it's full buoyancy (only drysuits could do this), so this value is already on the safe side.
I think you'll be fine with the 30lbs. If you want to be sure, find out your wetsuit weight.
you shouldn't need to add much air to the wing - only a couple of lbs too offset the weight carried to compensate for the increasing bouyancy of your tank as the dive progresses.
you must have some heavy air where you dive if this works..
or you are adding air to compensate for the increased buoyancy of your tank, so you'll get even more buoyant?
i usually add air to compensate for the wetsuit compression, and then purge it to compensate for the increased buoyancy of the tank.
I just order my first bq+w setup. SS back plate 30lb wing. Now I have doubt, I wonder if 30 will be good enough, or should I call and change to 40 for more margin. Can cold water driver comment?
Here is what I have been diving with: AL80, 7mm farmer john + 7mm jacket. 20lb weight belt. SeaQuest ProDQ BCD with 10lb intergrated.
Will I be OK with 30lb wing? What if I decide to take a smaller camera (canon G9 in underwater housing) and a small light with me (UK SL4 or similar). Would I still be OK? How about with a steel tank?
Should I call and switch to a 40lb wing?
You'll probably be fine with the 30 lb wing. The wing has to do two things; float your rig without you in it, and compensate for a total loss of buoyancy of your wetsuit plus the weight of your gas, assuming you're weighted properly.
Okay, so in your case lets assume that your wetsuit has about 20lbs buoyancy. It almost certainly has less, but since you're using 30 lbs total with an AL80.... anyhow, a very liberal estimate of buoyancy needed for that is 20lbs, plus 6 for the BP, maybe another 4 for the reg, camera, light, and there's your 30 lbs. You're not wearing that weight on the rig, so no problem floating it, and in an absolute worst case scenario at depth with your gear and a full tank you'd only need 30lbs if your wetsuit lost every pound of it's buoyancy, which of course it can't do unless you take it off and let it float away.
The 40 lb wing might float you a bit higher on the surface if that's important to you, but I bet you'll enjoy diving with the 30 lb wing more; it will vent quicker and easier and be a little more streamlined. There's probably not that much difference to be honest.
I just order my first bq+w setup. SS back plate 30lb wing. Now I have doubt, I wonder if 30 will be good enough, or should I call and change to 40 for more margin. Can cold water driver comment?
Here is what I have been diving with: AL80, 7mm farmer john + 7mm jacket. 20lb weight belt. SeaQuest ProDQ BCD with 10lb intergrated.
Will I be OK with 30lb wing? What if I decide to take a smaller camera (canon G9 in underwater housing) and a small light with me (UK SL4 or similar). Would I still be OK? How about with a steel tank?
Should I call and switch to a 40lb wing?
Come on people, this isn't rocket science.
LOOK at the information available. Our diver is using a total of 32 lbs of ballast, 20 in a belt, 10 in the BC and the reg is about -2 lbs, 20 + 10 + 2 = 32
32 lbs it the total of all the things that DON'T FLOAT
Now add the things that do float:
Empty al 80 = + 4 lbs
Current padded BC = ~ 4 lbs
Exposure suit = ? How do we estimate the suit?
Take the total ballast, 32 lbs less the tank and current BC 32 - 4 - 4 = 24 lbs.
Pretty simple.
If the divers suit is only +24 (Probably less because of over weighting) and the diver's rig is about -10 lbs with a full al 80, or about - 18 lbs with a full HP100
***Why*** would they need a 40 lbs wing?
Can a 30 lbs wing compensate for a full compressed 24 lbs positive wetsuit?
It does in my world
Can a 30 lbs wing float a rig that's unlikely to be more than 18 ~19 lbs negative with a full steel cylinder?
See above.
Is a 30 enough? Yup, might be more than they need.
op, try this. it was posted by tsandm, so if you need to search it that might help you find the original post.
take your suit & lots of lead to a pool. put the suit on the bottom around 6 or so feet & start putting lead on it. when it stays down, you have a rough idea of the inherent buoyancy in the suit.
but if you're comparing your weight belt needs with your bc to what you'll need with your new stuff, then don't worry. 30# of lift will be fine. you'll lose the lead needed to sink the bc (you can do the pool test with it, too) and the lead on the belt that will now be your plate & sta (if you have one). i bet your weight belt requirements will shrink by about 10 pounds.
...and the days go by, water flowing under ground, into the blue again, into the silent water, under the rocks and stones, there is water underground... - talking heads