Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Gilligan

Thread: S100

 


  1. #1
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    159

    S100

    I have an Olympus C5050 and think it is finally time to get a new camera...
    I originally wanted to get a G12, but read in many reviews that the S100 is a better camera. But is it a better UW camera?

    I also want to get a strobe for it (my first)... can anyone suggest a brand/model of strobe to go with it?
    Also, what do I have to pay attention to when I buy a strobe? Would they all fit or what?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    499
    Dives
    100 - 199
    They are different cameras. The S95 has a different lens. It has the same sensor (or is it the S95 and the G12 are the same?). The S95 is a smaller camera and takes smaller housings which is a good thing. From what I hear, the G12 is better at macro. I have the G11 and in order to do macro, you have to be in the wide angle range. That means you have to get REALLY close, which is not good. The camera does work well with an Inon wet lens. The limiting part of the G11 is that the wide angle is a functional 35 mm underwater and that is not wide enough. You need to get into one of the high end housings to be able to fit it with a dome that gives you true wide angle. Without a wide angle situation, I often found myself having to back off too far from large subjects: stingrays, turtles, divers, large grouper and landscapes to allow the strobes to adequately light them and to produce sharp photos because of the stuff in the water column.

    As for strobes, it seems to me that the S95 is more limited with strobes but I am not sure.

    Now, Canon has come out with a new version in its G series. The camera has a far larger sensor which puts its sensor nearly on par with a DSLR. Of course, the camera costs quite a bit. I have not heard of any housings for it yet but I am sure they will be out soon.

    Now as I understand it, the S100 is more compact, takes a much more compact housing, does RAW (vital). I do not know if it will take wet lenses. I think if you want to do decent macro, you need the wet lens. Also, you will find yourself limited if you do not have a pretty wide angle capability.

  3. #3
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    TheYellowSubmarine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    184
    Dives
    200 - 499
    if you have the budget for it, get the FIX or RECSEA housing so you can take wet lenses and have full access to all functions.
    A great first strobe is the INON S2000. Small yet powerful
    I have the S90 and love it. S100 looks great.

    There are many threads here dedicated to each of these item (regarding UW photography).
    I don't think anyone will say something in this thread that hasn't already been said in those threads. Enjoy the reading!

  4. #4
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    is alive
     

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    824
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Why doesn't Canon make lenses that perform internal zooming so the lens doesn't change length during the process, thus the housing doesn't have to have a fat rectangular port. That fat non-round port makes adapting any type wet lens expensive because you have to have a huge lens in the rear, and you have to rely on mounts like bungee cords.

  5. #5
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    is at sea.
     

    smellzlikefish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Oahu, Hawaii
    Posts
    1,043
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Photos
    3
    Lwang-I am not intimately familiar with Canon, but the answer is that they make the housings with the camera in mind, not visa versa. It is probably either more cost effective or results in better iomage quality to do it the way Canon does, my guess would be the former (cost).
    1. Always use the right tool for the job.
    2. A hammer is always the right tool.
    3. Anything can be used as a hammer.


    http://milisenphotography.yolasite.com/

  6. #6
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    No camera, no dive.
     

    Gilligan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Hawaii & Philippines
    Posts
    4,417
    Dives
    1,000 - 2,499
    Photos
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Lwang View Post
    Why doesn't Canon make lenses that perform internal zooming so the lens doesn't change length during the process, thus the housing doesn't have to have a fat rectangular port. That fat non-round port makes adapting any type wet lens expensive because you have to have a huge lens in the rear, and you have to rely on mounts like bungee cords.
    Canon does not make "underwater housings". They make "Waterproof Cases" One of their uses is underwater. They can also be used for other environments such as in the rain, snow, boating, etc. They are not marketed as "underwater housings " on the Canon website. I use them and I don't advise getting one if you are going to use wet mount lenses.
    "IT’S NOT THE YEARS IN YOUR LIFE THAT COUNT, IT’S THE LIFE IN YOUR YEARS"
    Canon G10 & G12 in Canon housings + Sea & Sea YS-27DX strobe.
    My Web Page

  7. #7
    Divemaster
    Badge


    waterboarded
     

    chile7236's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    628
    Photos
    58
    late chiming in here but after debating between the G12 and S100, i went with the S100 in the canon case. i prefer to shoot macro but inon's lenses can be used with the mount base on the WPDC43 case...so i feel like i can have my cake and eat it, too. can't wait for it to get here.

Similar Threads

  1. Canon HF S100
    By Marinevisions in forum Classifieds: Videography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 3rd, 2009, 02:04 PM
  2. Housing for upcoming Canon HF S100/S10
    By Scubacastor in forum Ikelite
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 16th, 2009, 10:29 AM
  3. Looking for a Ikelite 6140.10 for a Canon S100
    By LyneMarie in forum Classifieds: Photography
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 13th, 2006, 05:59 PM
  4. S100 ELF anyone?
    By carldarl in forum The Canon Corner
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 23rd, 2005, 12:24 AM
  5. S100 at 3000psi?
    By narcT in forum Tanks, Valves and Bands
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: October 24th, 2003, 10:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •