Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37


  1. #31
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    jhelmuth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    St Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    849
    Wireless AI bothers me a bit, but I'm fine with my AI Uwatec SmartCOM. I've been lead to believe that the RF wireless AI can be problematic in steel shipwrecks, and when in close proximity to same type units.

  2. #32
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    DeepTrip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenSquirrel
    I'm wondering if there is any hard data to support the opinion that digital SPG's fail more often than analog SPG's. It is a fact of scuba diving that the majority demographic is middle age males who supposedly don't trust technology. Is this just more distrust of "computers"?
    Thats probably one of the contributing factor against electronic SPG. I will try to comment from logical point of view.
    1. Digital SPG requires battery, analog one doesn't
    2. Digital SPG employs additional compartment to keep the electronic part and battery, another point of failure
    3. My analog SPG was leaking in a dive. It didn't leak air, but water got into the display. I know I was gambling by using it for 2nd dive, but I'm sure the digital one won't survive the leak.

    Benny
    Major of Aquarium City.
    - 2 Goldfish
    - 3 Angelfish

  3. #33
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    jonahfab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Lancaster, pa
    Posts
    84
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Any piece of equipment can fail you on any dive, thats why it is important to check equipment and have it anually inspected. I use a suunto cobra and love it, never had any problems. I know guys who have had spg's crap out on them so it just shows nothing is infailable.
    You've got to be tough if your gonna be stupid!

  4. #34
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    430
    Photos
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by DeepTrip
    Thats probably one of the contributing factor against electronic SPG. I will try to comment from logical point of view.
    1. Digital SPG requires battery, analog one doesn't
    2. Digital SPG employs additional compartment to keep the electronic part and battery, another point of failure
    3. My analog SPG was leaking in a dive. It didn't leak air, but water got into the display. I know I was gambling by using it for 2nd dive, but I'm sure the digital one won't survive the leak.
    Logic isn't always the best tool; Occam's razor is fairly sharp, but sometimes you cut yourself.

    Without going through a full fault tree, this doesn't take into account the question of different kinds of failures, how detectable each is, and what the consequences are.

    Broadly though, the most common in-water mechanical SPG failure would seem to be stuck-at-3000; the most common digital SPG failures would seem to be total failure. There's a fairly make-able argument that the latter is much more immediately detectable and less likely to lead into an incident pit.

  5. #35
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    Has not set a "status"
     

    O2BBubbleFree's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by lairdb
    Broadly though, the most common in-water mechanical SPG failure would seem to be stuck-at-3000; the most common digital SPG failures would seem to be total failure. There's a fairly make-able argument that the latter is much more immediately detectable and less likely to lead into an incident pit.
    Well put, for comps in general.

    WRT wireless, if a wireless comp lost comms it may continue to display the last known PSI/Bar, which would be an equivalent situation to a 'stuck-at-some-pressure' SPG. Either should be readily evident to an observant diver. "hey, I haven't used any air in the last 10 minutes. I gotta figure this out and market it!"

    However, I would expect any well-designed comp to realize that it hasn't updated, and give a warning to the diver.

    I would argue that the comp is safer in either instance.
    I firmly believe its bad luck to be superstitious.

  6. #36
    Divemaster
    Badge


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    14
    Dives
    200 - 499
    FWIW I have had 4 wrist mounted computers die on me over the last year. These have all been AI ones. All 4 have had different failures. Once it just went blank. Then no tank psi and so on. Never again will I trust any piece of electronic equipment with my life. Just am glad I had an SPG, old fashioned depth gauge and watch with me at all times. Nothing like backup.

  7. #37
    Frequent Poster


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    430
    Photos
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by 3dent
    Well put, for comps in general.

    WRT wireless, if a wireless comp lost comms it may continue to display the last known PSI/Bar, which would be an equivalent situation to a 'stuck-at-some-pressure' SPG. Either should be readily evident to an observant diver.[...]

    However, I would expect any well-designed comp to realize that it hasn't updated, and give a warning to the diver.
    If the wireless comp displays a "lost comm" indicator that is sufficiently obvious, I'd be inclined to argue that it's not equivalent to a stuck needle. A stuck needle's only warning comes when you think "that's funny" and tap on it.

    (Incidentally, don't they teach tapping the gauge to make sure the needle vibrates any more?)

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Computer Users: How Often Do you PLAN repet dives with your computer?
    By Newhampster in forum Computers, Gauges, Watches and Analyzers
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: November 7th, 2006, 04:42 AM
  2. What's a suitable computer for a new computer-buyer?
    By DiverMK in forum Computers, Gauges, Watches and Analyzers
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: January 10th, 2006, 11:39 AM
  3. Article in a computer mag about someones AI computer failure
    By Damselfish in forum Computers, Gauges, Watches and Analyzers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 13th, 2004, 07:32 PM
  4. Need Opinions: wrist computer vs. watch/computer combo
    By gizmogirl in forum Computers, Gauges, Watches and Analyzers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 25th, 2004, 06:34 PM
  5. Two on a computer
    By xtarheel in forum Computers, Gauges, Watches and Analyzers
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: September 10th, 2002, 09:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •