Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 185,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
What I minute as anal as DIR is about extra failure points and being streamlined and you can't even admit an SPG on a hose has extra failure points and is less streamlined???
I don't think DIR is anal about failure points at all. I think we are strategic about failure points. Hence not using AIR2s. In that case "saving a hose failure point" is not worth the added pita factor of having bouyancy and your breathing gas in your mouth simultaneously.
To get to your streamlined point... Look at the larger button gauges, they are prefect mushroom shaped line traps. So I don't see one being much better than the other in the streamlined arena.
Bottom line I don't see enough pros for buttons gauges versus the pros for SPG on a 6" hose for GUE to change standards or for a "NON-GUE DIR" team to change protocols and go to a button gauge.
The only place it might make since is if you are only diving one bottle and don't plan to go to multiple bottles. What GUE DIR diver or "unified dive team" is actually going to go that route?