Question: Why are 'low volume' masks better than 'high volume' masks?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Except that most very low volume masks, of the type for spearfishing, use very small glass areas and black skirts anyway. So you still only see what is in front of you.
Field of view is the third most important thing (after comfort and no leaking).
I generally use low volume black masks and I find I still have very good vision. There are a few freedive (rather than spearfishing masks (e.g., Cressi sub Minima model) that have poor visibility, but the other masks I use are all good.
In general, there is no reason not to use a low volume mask for scuba diving other than personal preference.