Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 39 of 39
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Which is heavier? 1lb of lead or 1lb of feathers?

 


  1. #31
    I like diving (and toast)


    Happy to be in Sunny South
    Florida
     

    HowardE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
    Dives
    1,000 - 2,499
    Photos
    1023
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter View Post
    More likely reasons for the difference would be trapped air in the BC
    I agree with Walter. It's more likely that there was air in the BCD, and that when you hit 40 feet, the air in the BCD was mostly compressed, and made it easier to remain neutral. The same air (that probably didn't properly vent) at 14 feet would be more buoyant.

    Another possibility is the compression of the wetsuit, and that at a shallower depth, the wetsuit is less compressed, and therefore more buoyant, but at depth, it's more compressed, and less buoyant, and easier to maintain neutral buoyancy, when the diver is underweighted.
    -- Howard --

    Please do not PM me site support issues. Please post them in the Site Support forum so that others can solve similar problems (if they have them) by reading our site support forum.

  2. #32
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    suffering another long SI
     

    fire_diver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NW Oklahoma, USA
    Posts
    2,791
    specific gravity is completely seperate from weight the SG of lead will always be the same, regardless of the amount of lead.
    " Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    ."
    check out www.lakediver.com for all your inland diving.

  3. #33
     


    Diving, diving, diving in Maui
     

    Charlie99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA / New Bedford, MA / Kihei, Maui
    Dives
    500 - 999
    Photos
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by The Kraken View Post
    Using the NIST they are the same.

    But if you start using the avoirdupois scales, etc. then that's a different matter.

    So, to which scale do you subscribe?
    When measuring my immense pile of gold I always use the unit of troy pounds. Same for when I used to measure my "pounds sterling" of silver. So a pound of gold is about 373 grams, while a pound of feathers is about 454 grams.

    On a more serious note, the commonly quoted price of an ounce of gold is indeed a troy ounce, not an avoirdupois ounce. Although the troy pound is smaller than the avoirdupois pound, since there are only 12 troy ounces per troy pound, the troy ounce (ozt) is slightly larger than the more common avoirdupois ounce (oz). 31.1034768 grams vs 28.349523125 g. You can easily check this by finding a source that quotes gold prices in both per ounce and per gram. You will find the ratio between the prices is 31.10x rather than 28.35.

    I regret that the US Congress halted the metrification process back in the 1970s, leaving common 2 liter Coke bottle as one of the few relics of that program.

    ....... OK, now who is going to start the mass vs. weight thread hijack ...

  4. #34
    Frequent Poster


    is calculating
    indefinite integrals
     

    Hashime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    489
    Dives
    50 - 99
    The SG of iron (depending one the composition and casting method) is about 7.2, compared to lead which has an SG of 11.3. That makes Lead about 40% denser. In terms of buoyancy, one Kg of lead (which produces appx. 9.8N of force down on the surface) only produces 9N of force down underwater. Iron on the other hand only produces about 8.43N down underwater.

    Note: This is difficult for me to explain, I only know how to work in metric. The Imperial system uses the same term for both mass and weight (which are not the same) so don't complain.

    Anyways, all converted, 1kg of lead (2.2 pounds) weighs 2.016 "pounds" (pounds-force really) compared to 1kg of iron, which weighs 1.882 pounds underwater.

    So if you want a conversion factor (rough) multiply the amount of lead you use by 1.07 and you should weigh close to the same amount underwater.

    Note: All calculations done using fresh water. (though since this is a ratio the factor will work the same for all fluids, It is actually more like 1.06 if I were to keep more decimal places, but unless you go custom the smallest increment you can really get is one pound, so it does not matter.)

    If I did my math wrong it is because I should not be doing math at 00:40.

  5. #35
    Frequent Poster


    is calculating
    indefinite integrals
     

    Hashime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    489
    Dives
    50 - 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie99 View Post
    My calculations come out the same as ss7's ---- the difference in negative buoyancy between 15 pounds of lead and 15 pounds of iron is less than 0.6 pounds.

    ==================================
    Calculations details for those that are curious.

    specific gravity of lead is around 11.3, iron is 7.85.
    Divide 15 pounds by 2.2 to convert it to 6.8kg.
    6.8kg of lead will have a volume of 6.8/11.3 = 0.6 liters. The water displaced by that 0.6 liter volume will weigh just a smidgen over 0.6kg or 1.3 pounds.
    The negative buoyancy from 15 pounds of lead is 15-1.3 = 13.7 pounds.

    The same calculation with iron comes up with 1.9 pounds of buoyancy.

    The the difference in negative buoyancy between 15 pounds of iron and 15 pounds of lead is 1.9-1.3 = 0.6 pounds.

    --------

    Of course, if one had been through the calculation before, then you would know that the negative buoyancy from something is simply = weight * (specific gravity - 1) / (specific gravity). Or to be more precise, replace 1 with the 1.03 for saltwater.
    Damn, you did it first. Anyways, I had fun remembering my physics.

  6. #36
    NA


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    3,031
    Photos
    16
    So this must be why ships, aren't made of lead or
    feathers and kilograms apply to weight AND mass

  7. #37
     


    SEI/CMAS Instructor Trainer
     

    Walter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Lehigh Acres, Florida
    Posts
    18,628
    Photos
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by knowone
    kilograms apply to weight AND mass
    The metric unit for weight is the rarely used newton.
    The Devil's in the details.

    Disclaimer: All discussion of value, by me or anyone else, is opinion.

    For a comprehensive approach to diving education, check out Scuba Educators International (SEI) Diving.

  8. #38
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    says "Bet your life
    on it?"
     

    Leadking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    777
    Reminds me of the woman at a DEMA show who picked up one of our weights and exclaimed that is was extremely heavy. She asked what they were made of. Lead I explained. She then asked "Why don't you make them out of aluminium, they would be so much lighter?"

  9. #39
     


    isn't going to set a status.
     

    aquaregia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    1,881
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Photos
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter View Post
    The metric unit for weight is the rarely used newton.
    Not to be confused with the nouveau metric newtonne.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Weight type: bare lead vs coated vs lead shots
    By eelnoraa in forum Buoyancy Compensators (BC's) and Weight Systems
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: September 10th, 2009, 08:46 PM
  2. Which is heavier?
    By SCUBAJENNIFER in forum Mares... Just add Water!
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: January 29th, 2007, 01:45 PM
  3. Heavier Backplate
    By badmrchris in forum Buoyancy Compensators (BC's) and Weight Systems
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: November 5th, 2006, 10:25 PM
  4. Heavier fins....loose some lead?
    By Skinsfan1311 in forum Fins, Masks and Snorkels
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: September 27th, 2006, 03:02 PM
  5. Heavier plate, or P-Weight?
    By kaliban in forum Buoyancy Compensators (BC's) and Weight Systems
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: November 12th, 2003, 03:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •