why the scoff and disregard for popular magazine gear reviews ?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Yeah, I do agree with that - they are a little more balanced. That said, I've found myself banging my head against a wall a few times, as the reviewers (esp. Mr John Bantin) seem to miss-understand some diving philosophies behind certain kit designs. Never sure if there was a skew to the article to favour certain manufacturers, or whether they just don't understand that they're trying to (badly) compare apples and oranges..
From the looks of this article, it appears to me as if Divernet decided to use Halcyon to sell against, and set the stage with the lame recreational ideas of a diver with less than 20 dives...Given the foundation they run with, the comparison with Halcyon shows the Pegasus to be pretty smart.....too bad they missed close to 100% of the real issues...
8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Originally Posted by DevonDiver
Reply With Quote