why the scoff and disregard for popular magazine gear reviews ?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
why the scoff and disregard for popular magazine gear reviews ?
i've been in and out of the forums for about a year-and-a-half now and have always been aware of the scoff and disregard for gear reviews in the popular scuba magazines. thing is, i've never really heard WHY or what they're doing so wrongly. what is about XYZ Magazine's "Gear of the Year" issue that is so incorrect?
i've been in and out of the forums for about a year-and-a-half now and have always been aware of the scoff and disregard for gear reviews in the popular scuba magazines. thing is, i've never really heard WHY or what they're doing so wrongly. what is about XYZ Magazine's "Gear of the Year" issue that is so incorrect?
(not trying to troll, honest inquiry.)
Their tests are always bogus...even when they use reasonable criteria in a test ( sometimes happens), they stack the deck by only testing the gear they want to showcase--and AVOID testing gear that would be far better in the tests, than the brands of their advertisers which they are testing.
For instance, every year there is a top fin test....yet they have NEVER tested DiveR freedive fins ( for scuba use) , these fins being like the Lamborghini Galardo of fins, and easily would destroy the brands of the advertisers being tested. They ignore the superiority of freedive fins being made in soft, medium, stiffer and stiffest flex charicteristics, to match the fitness level of the scuba diver, and the intended use...I could go on about this for a long time :-)
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -George Orwell
Given that our biggest fear, death, is inescapable, doesn’t it seem ridiculous to let our smaller fears dictate how we live our too short lives? -Me
“It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things than power.” -- David Brin
because the selection bias in what they test is *staggering*. because the uses they put the equipment to have nothing whatever to do with how i dive. because - have you ever seen any piece of equipment have 'this really sucks. i can't see a use for it at all.' written about it? no? me either, but lots of equipment really sucks.
when they put bp/w, jetfins, and predators in the tests, i'll read them cheerfully. until then...nope.
...and the days go by, water flowing under ground, into the blue again, into the silent water, under the rocks and stones, there is water underground... - talking heads
Once upon a time Dacor had the number 1 Mask, the number 1 Fin, the number 1 BCD, and the number 1 Regulator all in the same year.....
What are the chances that was because they were they spent the most money on advertising?
Also, have you ever seen a product review of like 10 masks. And the magazine ranks Mask X as number 1 and ranks Mask Z as number 4. When you look closely you realize that those mask are the exact same mask made by the same manufacturing company just with different badging on them. Kind of like Scubapro and Halcyon or Hollis and Oceanic.
Do you know the difference between a magazine article on new gear and an advertisement???
Either do most magazines.
I know the difference, which is why I consider 99% of magazine reviews/articles as advertisements.
There's quite a few 'reviews' that just copy-paste the manufacturers' blurb as a review (Google the words and you'll see they appear on many reviews). Others portray a very positive view, but neglect to provide any meaningful negative feedback. Few, if any, reviews really provide honest comparisons against the wider market and/or the true competition.
Give me a few $000s for marketing and I reckon I could get a house brick rated as a top product for divers.
8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by jallen013
