How long until you'd consider diving Japan's waters?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
View Poll Results: When will it be safe to dive Japan's waters?
SEI Diving Instructor #00204, CMAS Instructor #USAF0012000204, TDI Instructor #16810
Owner UDM AQUATIC SERVICES. Now available:SCUBA:A Practical Guide for the New Diver- Print $20 + postage, CD $12.50 + postage, PDf $10 - jimlap212@comcast.net Offering the full line of Edge/HOG gearemail for details.Also now offering products from XS Scuba!
Glib comments aside, They will have to completely seal the reactors off, and that will take time. There is highly radio active waste water running into the ocean by millions of gallons a day (just to keep the reactor from completely melting down). The ground for miles around is highly contaminated and that will be running off into the ocean for quite a while.
It would be years after sealing before I would dive in the region.
" Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
."
check out www.lakediver.com for all your inland diving.
Glib comments aside, They will have to completely seal the reactors off, and that will take time. There is highly radio active waste water running into the ocean by millions of gallons a day (just to keep the reactor from completely melting down). The ground for miles around is highly contaminated and that will be running off into the ocean for quite a while.
It would be years after sealing before I would dive in the region.
Given the half-life of the radioactive materials that have leaked into the water, a few years isn't going to change much in terms of radioactivity (with the exception of iodine-131 which is like 8 days half life).
That being said I don't think diving in the water would be much of an issue. Water itself is a very effective barrier to loose radioactive particles (the 2nd reason they douse reactors in water) so unless you're diving in that harbour RIGHT next to the reactor then you will be fine.
Please note: I'm no expert so if you go diving and grow a third arm or something I take no responsibility
That doesn't mean I'd be interested in any salvage work diving near the reactor, but Japan's a big country. Even just in Tokyo, the crew still does regular dives each week.
Even supposing some issue of contaminants, let's not forget that we do wear protective barriers called "drysuits" each time. To be fair, they're not on par with hazardous contaminant suits, but close enough.
I'd have no problem diving right now down in Izu peninsula area south of Tokyo, but the water offshore from the area hit by the tsunami would be problematic, with or without the nuclear issue. A lot of stuff got pulled into the ocean.
I'd have no problem diving right now down in Izu peninsula area south of Tokyo, but the water offshore from the area hit by the tsunami would be problematic, with or without the nuclear issue. A lot of stuff got pulled into the ocean.
Yeah, the debris/body recovery would be the greater concern. I'd be honored if a group like ours was asked to be part of the offshore recovery efforts if for no other reason than it gets us involved rather than sid idly by, but it's highly unlikely. And the continual recurrence of aftershocks and the potential for more tsunamis is more than a little worrisome.