Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers diving from around the world. If the topic is related to scuba diving, this is the place to find divers talking about it. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
  • Find a dive buddy or communicate directly with scuba equipment manufacturers.

All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

NEW for 2014 Access SBlogbook for members. It allows you to directly upload data from your dive computer, validate your logs digitally, link your dives to photos, videos, dive centers (9,000 on file), fishes (14,000 on file) and much more.

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Hogarthian and Jacket BCs?

 


  1. #1
    mer
    mer is offline
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    mer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    MA, FL, HI
    Posts
    806
    Dives
    1,000 - 2,499

    Hogarthian and Jacket BCs?

    I always considered the Hogarthian system's foundation to be backplate/wings/long hose; but then I read statement onebrightgator dug up from Bill Main of Hogarthian's "only guidelines being take only what you need, and if you need it, bring two."

    Is it possible to have a minimalist approach with a jacket BC? I always thought it was not, and that a jacket would create more problems than it solved, but this very open guideline has made me pause.

    PS - Congratualtions on the new forum. I also hope that us DIR divers can contribute civily over here. I do believe Hog. is a better, safer system, yet still allows the freedom for new divers to decide if they like the rig and make an informed decision as to which philosophy to follow.
    Wet Rocks Diving --- GUE Instructor --- Boston / Kona, Hawaii / High Springs, Florida
    Have a real estate question? Drop me a line.
    Less bull-"byproduct", more diving! (A kinder, gentler, TOS complying signature.)

  2. #2
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    MechDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    2,384
    Quote Originally Posted by mer
    I always considered the Hogarthian system's foundation to be backplate/wings/long hose; but then I read statement onebrightgator dug up from Bill Main of Hogarthian's "only guidelines being take only what you need, and if you need it, bring two."

    Is it possible to have a minimalist approach with a jacket BC? I always thought it was not, and that a jacket would create more problems than it solved, but this very open guideline has made me pause.
    My opinon would be, no, a jacket is not Hogarthian.

    Now, to answer your direct question, could a jacket be minimalist, I would have to say it depends on the wearer.

    I think you're trying to define two different terms Mer. Although the question is an excellent one.

    MD

  3. #3
    Kim
    Kim is offline
    Here for my friends.....


    Thinks Rambo is a twat.
     

    Kim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kyushu, Japan
    Posts
    13,254
    Photos
    1
    You'd look pretty funny with two BCD's
    ............Kim.

    At the end of the day we are all going home.

    There is nowhere else to go.

  4. #4
    Uncle Ricky


    - Trusty Shellback
     

    Rick Murchison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Gulf of Mexico
    Posts
    13,214
    Dives
    1,000 - 2,499
    Photos
    254

    Bill's guidelines

    When I first started incorporating Bill Main's ideas into my own diving, I did so with a jacket - and a short hose, for that matter. There is *nothing* in the Hogarthian principles that dictates a BP/wing. Streamlining, minimalism with adequate redundancy, location of all essentials in the "triangle" can all be accomodated easily with most jackets. The "Hogarthian" rig has never been equipment specific, but rather a set of principles by which to rig what you have.
    IOW, don't get wrapped around the axle on a specific piece of gear. The extended Hogarthian rig that does that is part of the "DIR" set.
    Rick
    "You can have peace, or you can have Freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once." (Heinlein)
    "... they saw the deeds of the LORD, his wondrous works in the deep." (Ps107:24)

  5. #5
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    MechDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    2,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Murchison
    When I first started incorporating Bill Main's ideas into my own diving, I did so with a jacket - and a short hose, for that matter.
    Rick
    And that would be expected, would it not? Otherwise, you would have already been Hog.

    Probably a misconception on my part, but I equate Hogarthian with caves, tech, doubles, and the equipment that goes with that style of diving as I believe that was Main's focus at the time?

    MD

  6. #6
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Ontario Diver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Great White North
    Posts
    1,311
    Quote Originally Posted by MechDiver
    And that would be expected, would it not? Otherwise, you would have already been Hog.

    Probably a misconception on my part, but I equate Hogarthian with caves, tech, doubles, and the equipment that goes with that style of diving as I believe that was Main's focus at the time?

    MD
    Yeah, I believe that it was.... but this doesn not remove the usefullness of the system concepts for all divers. I know of a number of divers who have moved to necklace mounted secondaries even though still using a jacket.

    I also know of a number of "divers" who could benefit from a more minimalist approach. (They look like they crashed through a dive shop on the way to the water.)

    Another good example of cross-over is the use of line running in wreck penetration.

    Anything that makes a dive and diver safer is a good thing.
    Ontario Diver

    "It's Cold, It's Murky. Lots of Wrecks, 18 Species of fish (all various shades of brown and green) but the best beer in the world"

  7. #7
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    MechDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    2,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Ontario Diver
    Yeah, I believe that it was.... but this doesn not remove the usefullness of the system concepts for all divers. I know of a number of divers who have moved to necklace mounted secondaries even though still using a jacket.

    I also know of a number of "divers" who could benefit from a more minimalist approach. (They look like they crashed through a dive shop on the way to the water.)

    Another good example of cross-over is the use of line running in wreck penetration.

    Anything that makes a dive and diver safer is a good thing.
    Totally agree. I was just trying to pin down concepts more so than areas of usefullness.
    Good post.

    MD

  8. #8
    Scuba Instructor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    OneBrightGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    St. Augustine, FL
    Posts
    1,835
    Dives
    None - Not Certified
    Bill himself dives a BP/wing... I dunno if you can get more Hogarth then that!

    That being said, I don't believe there's any exact specifications in Hogarthian diving, more ideals that can be applied to any equipment set to make diving better.

    (btw, that was not a direct quote from Bill, just to clarify)

    Ben

  9. #9
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    underwater daphne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    380
    since this is hogathian and not dir i don't see any reason why you shouldn't wear a jacket bc if it fits you well.

  10. #10
    Renaissance Diver
    Go Red - Support SB!

    Has not set a "status"
     

    headhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    So Cal (Altadena)
    Posts
    8,843
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Interesting question.

    Obviously, the feeling here is that you could sort of pick and choose your gear in such a way that "minimalism" would be your guide. Streamlining also seems to play a part.

    Could it be that some Jacket Style BCs would be considered Hogarthian while some others would not?

    ...or would it be said that all traditional Jacket Style BCs would be excluded from a Hogarthian rig because they are not streamlined due to their very form (shape and size)? I'm thinking of the way they wrap around you, making you look a bit like the Michellin Man. I imagine that this would produce quite a bit of drag going through the water and therefore not conform to the minimalist guideline. Additionally, would a back inflate BC be excluded from this criticism?

    It seems that further definition is necessary to come up with our baseline definition for what is or is not Hogarthian.

    Does anyone here know Bill? I read a statement made by him and a few of his contemporaries that they really don't spend any time in online discussion and only felt compelled to do so on a particular issue where they felt that they needed to (as a group) set the record straight.

    I just thought that someone might be able to speak with him and post a short statement on his behalf. Or maybe he himself would be willing to write a simple statement that could be used as a sticky note at the top of the forum. I just feel that since we are going to attach his name to the forum for the whole world to see, that it would be nice to at least try to get his philosophy correctly portrayed, right from the start.

    It is not my intent to hijack this thread. It just seems that in order the answer the original question, we also need to attempt to correctly define "Hogarthian". I think they are inextricably related.

    Does this sound right to anyone else?

    Christian
    What is The Dive Matrix?
    (See how far the rabbit hole goes...)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Tell Us About Your Hogarthian Rig
    By Quarrior in forum Hogarthian Diving
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: May 27th, 2014, 11:20 AM
  2. The Hogarthian Way
    By CRDiver in forum Hogarthian Diving
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: January 2nd, 2005, 08:16 PM
  3. Hogarthian
    By Essroc123 in forum New Divers and Those Considering Diving
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 25th, 2004, 06:20 PM
  4. Hogarthian vs. DIR
    By poolah in forum Basic Scuba Discussions
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: November 18th, 2003, 12:48 PM
  5. Path to the Hogarthian Way
    By aleggo in forum General Scuba Equipment Discussions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: July 24th, 2003, 03:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •