Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Well, I agree with rules 3 and 4. Rules 1 and 2 are ridiculously outdated. I'd like to think that, in the last 45 years, diving has evolved. Good buddy skills, modern equipment, and modern decompression techniques make your rule #1 obsolete.
Well, that is a very old rule from a set of three basic rules that date back to the beginning of diving. They are not mine. I first heard them in my scuba course in around 66. I have seen them in print and most recently in the book "Solo Diving" though they certainly predate that text. The rules are---follow them or not---
1. Never scuba dive deeper than twice the depth to which you can free dive.
2. Never swim further from the entrance or beginning point of your dive than you can comfortably swim on the surface fully equipped.
3. Rule of thirds (air management), 1/3 out, 1/3 back to the boat, beach or at least to the safety stop, 1/3 in reserve (assuming no deco)
---and of course they actually is a 4th rule which I choose to break regularly--
4. Always dive with a competent buddy, always let someone responsible know where you are etc.
Aaarrgh, Matey! Strap the weights to your body with barbed-wire and dive naked! ...And if ya can't take it, yer outta here!
Man, I thought I had been diving for a while! (I started in 72, when we at least had single hose regulators!
Soggy, if you note they are not my rules, I just relayed them as I remember them. Certainly following them entirely eliminates the argument for all this air redundancy--lol--well--maybe not. Yes diving has evolved, rebreathers are taking people to crazy depths and apparently some people purposely deco dive with no chamber and no surface support.
I am not all that old, I took my first class before I could be certified as a child, took it a second time for cert, they had silly rules back then too. I don't think rule number 1 is all that outdated for SPORT diving in OW. In my prime I could easily or not so easily free dive to 60 and 70 plus depths so twice that put my dive limit right at 130 feet which is considered the sport diving limit even today. I have known many people who could free dive 40 to 60 feet and some much deeper. The idea obviously is that in lieu of redundancy should an air problem develop you should be able to make a free swimming ascent. Obviously, again, things have evoloved like the modern divers need/dependency on equipment such as pony bottles and what not and OK, so that is good you say but then is not staying within a depth range to whcih one could make a free ascent not also a form of redundancy?
"Man, I thought I had been diving for a while! (I started in 72, when we at least had single hose regulators!"
LOL, if Bill Main or some other noted individual told folks that double hose regs were the way to go they would be out scouring ebay lickety split!!!!!!!!!!! Since you have been around a while also then you have probably noticed the re-emergence of back inflation BC--wings as THE system of choice for example so all I am saying is that don't be surprised if double hose regs make a comeback! Cousteu used them to the end of his career and he certainly knew a thing or two.
A modern designed servo/pilot assisted double hose with HP and LP ports for using spgs and mounting a single hose second for octa and inflators would probably out perform any current regulator on the market. AL still makes a dh reg for the military for rebreather training/simulation. They don't ice up, they are light weight in the mouth, they can flow large volumes of gas. For redundancy, it could be built in, twin second stages (dh regs were both one stage such as the Mistral and two stage such as the DA) in the housing for example could easily be accomplished. Since rebreathers use dh like hoses etc, some do it seems and some military units as well and so much of modern scuba is style driven don't be surprised if dh regs come back around! N
when i worked as a commercial fisherman/diver,i would wear my pony upside down,but i used s/s adjustable clamps to bind a section of rubber radiator hose to my valve handle for easy access to turn on when i reached around behind my back.worked like a charm.i needed to use it once in a emergency.when my air got shut off accidentially.anyway,greetings from the great white north.
this is the hogarthian forum WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT
where in here does it state its a HOG FORUM,,,???
Originally Posted by Scubaroo
For starters, this is the hogarthian forum - don't bring DIR or George Irvine into the thread.
A set of doubles usually has a manifold bridging the tanks - a back mounted pony forms a channel between the pony and the main tank, to the depth of the first mounting bracket or camstrap holding the pony. Board members have reported getting line caught in there.
Ah... welcome to ScubaBoard, yipiekaya. Interesting first post.
Yes, this is the Hogarthian forum within ScubaBoard. ScubaBoard is not just a hog forum, but has sub forums within, like this one. If you look at the top of the screen you'll see:
ScubaBoard.Com > Scuba Diving Central> Technical Diving Specialties> Hogarthian Diving> uPSIDEdOWN pONY
A legitimate adventure has no predetermined outcome. - Chatterton
A flawlessly working rebreather is almost as dangerous as a completely unreliable unit since reliability encourages complacency. - Howard Hall stating the Richard Pyle Paradox
Decompression algorithms are akin to measuring with a micrometer, marking with chalk and cutting with an ax. - Rick Murchison
<form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post"> <input name="cmd" value="_s-xclick" type="hidden"> <input name="hosted_button_id" value="GYWR5TJFW8A5G" type="hidden"> Read this and protect our right to post on ScubaBoard!
<input src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif" name="submit" alt="PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!" type="image" border="0"> https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif
</form>to ScubaBoard's Legal Defense Fund
A legitimate adventure has no predetermined outcome. - Chatterton
A flawlessly working rebreather is almost as dangerous as a completely unreliable unit since reliability encourages complacency. - Howard Hall stating the Richard Pyle Paradox
Decompression algorithms are akin to measuring with a micrometer, marking with chalk and cutting with an ax. - Rick Murchison
<form action="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post"> <input name="cmd" value="_s-xclick" type="hidden"> <input name="hosted_button_id" value="GYWR5TJFW8A5G" type="hidden"> Read this and protect our right to post on ScubaBoard!
<input src="https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/btn/btn_donateCC_LG.gif" name="submit" alt="PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!" type="image" border="0"> https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif
</form>to ScubaBoard's Legal Defense Fund