Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Weights came to mind first. Dumping them would also reduce drag and make you lighter and reduce the effect of the back inflate BC to put you face down.
Also any possibilty of letting the surf push you in. Ive seen divers struggle here att he beavertail lighthouse in RI not realizing all they need to do is catch a wave and ride it in.
just joined the board, I'm always interested in these dive stories as I always learn from them.
I'm guessing the diver doesn't carry a snorkel or thought of using it? I always dive with one as like the diver, I find I suck air faster than most. After I am in the water or after I make it out past the breaking waves on a shore dive, I switch to the snorkel until everyone is ready to go down. Same thing on the way up, once I'm at surface I switch to it.
Based on the description of the event it's not clear if there would have been too much wave action to make a snorkel useful when in close however it would have been an option had it been available. In this case when surfacing and trying to swim in had the diver been on snorkel the amount of air in the tank would not have been a concern and perhaps would have prevented a panic situation.
I'm always surprised at the number of divers I see who don't dive with a snorkel.
on my first and only shore dive after i surfaced and began to swim to shore i noticed how difficult it was to make any headway. conditions were really good so i rolld over on my back and took my reg out and just started kicking backwards to shore. it took a long time and a lot of work to get back...it could have easily been more than 20 minutes...dont know what the distance was
part of the problem is id close my eyes and kinda relax while i was kicking only to reliaze id somehow gotten turned into a direction that wasnt perpindicular to the beach.
i definetly didnt like how long it took to go a relatively short distance.
part of the problem is id close my eyes and kinda relax while i was kicking only to reliaze id somehow gotten turned into a direction that wasnt perpindicular to the beach.
In another life I coached skiing and it was not uncommon at all for athletes to have a "strong side" - or to turn better/more powerfully in one direction than the other. I assume that this is true in divers as well. Could explain why you were suddenly (inexplicably?) turned parallel to shore - your stronger side kicked harder and spun you.
I have a question: if only 30 feet from shore with 500 psi of air, would it not have been easier to just descend, swim under the current pulling yourself along the bottom, and exit at a depth that you could walk?
Or he was at the edge of the rip tideand got spun around. Clearly it was the rip tide impeading his progress. As an old surfer I learned how narrow the rip tide current might be. Sometimes merely cruising another few feet to one side or the other puts you out of it and you can body surf your way in. While in the rip tide you CANNOT ride the waves in. Just move parallel to shore till the rip is gone. Glad your friend made it in safely. Rip tides have taken far more swimmers than sharks ever will.