Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers diving from around the world. If the topic is related to scuba diving, this is the place to find divers talking about it. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
  • Find a dive buddy or communicate directly with scuba equipment manufacturers.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 60mm or 105mm macro?

 


  1. #1
    Barangay Pasaway


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Spoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    6,594
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Photos
    122

    nikkon 60mm or sigma 105mm macro?

    guys i am really excited to test the new camera and am deciding on a macro lens to get. when i had my point and shoot, one of my favs was to shoot in macro especially in the clear warm waters of the philippines. was wondering which to get? which is the more versatile lens?

    also is there a big difference between the sigma 105mm and the nikon 105mm?
    Last edited by Spoon; May 19th, 2006 at 06:45 AM.
    Spoon "Lurker at the Threshold"
    www.gemwood.net

  2. #2
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    kdietz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    218
    I would start with the Nikon 60mm and save for the Nikon 105....it doesn't get any better than these two

    Karl
    Nikon D200....Ikelite iTTL housing...10.5mm...15mm...12-24mm...18-70mm...60mm...105mm...Dual DS-200's
    www.kdietz.com

  3. #3
    Yes I Did


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Mo2vation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    7,133
    Photos
    27
    I took Karl's advice and got the 60 in November (alone with Woody's Diopter). I've had it out on a zillion trips and am just starting to get to the point where I want to get the 105 for some super, hyper, crazy-go-nuts Macro stuff.

    6 months with the 60 and hundreds and hundreds of images have been an excellent Macro education.

    You rock, Karl!

    ---
    Ken
    When its time to dive. DiveMatrix.com

  4. #4
    Divemaster
    Badge


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Cacia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Photos
    52
    Spoon, I asked this question of Mauricio Handler (photog) and his answer to my "If I can only buy two lenses...?" was to get the 105 mm and the 12-24 WA.

    Since I have added the 10.5 fish eye but don't have a port yet.

    Everything I say is untrue and the opposite of what I really think, and I constantly make all kinds of things up just for fun

  5. #5
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    kdietz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    218
    I'm no Mauricio....but I know him and have taken one of his photography courses and I'd still recommend the 60 over the 105 for a first macro lens.

    They both shoot 1:1, so the 105 can't really take closer shots....it can take them from a little farther away which can be handy with nervous critters. If you are diving in dirty or darker water....S. Cal or Lembeh for instance.....the 60 will shine over the 105.

    The 60 is a little sharper, has better DOF and a FOV that makes it versatile for either fish portraits or 1:1 macro

    Karl
    Nikon D200....Ikelite iTTL housing...10.5mm...15mm...12-24mm...18-70mm...60mm...105mm...Dual DS-200's
    www.kdietz.com

  6. #6
    Barangay Pasaway


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Spoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    6,594
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Photos
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Mo2vation
    I took Karl's advice and got the 60 in November (alone with Woody's Diopter). I've had it out on a zillion trips and am just starting to get to the point where I want to get the 105 for some super, hyper, crazy-go-nuts Macro stuff.

    6 months with the 60 and hundreds and hundreds of images have been an excellent Macro education.

    You rock, Karl!

    ---
    Ken
    which of the two do you actually use more?
    Quote Originally Posted by Kdietz
    The 60 is a little sharper, has better DOF and a FOV that makes it versatile for either fish portraits or 1:1 macro
    thanks karl! the consensus is the 60mm is the more versatile of the two and in clear philippine waters, might edge out the more expensive 105 in terms of practical usage. now if only chooseing between the d200 and d70s was easier
    Spoon "Lurker at the Threshold"
    www.gemwood.net

  7. #7
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    kdietz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    218
    We were in Lembeh for 2 weeks and we both used 60's exclusively....when we dive in clear water, it's probably 60/40 toward the 105

    Karl
    Nikon D200....Ikelite iTTL housing...10.5mm...15mm...12-24mm...18-70mm...60mm...105mm...Dual DS-200's
    www.kdietz.com

  8. #8
    Yes I Did


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Mo2vation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    7,133
    Photos
    27

    Ahem...

    Quote Originally Posted by kdietz
    <snip> If you are diving in dirty or darker water....S. Cal or Lembeh for instance.....the 60 will shine over the 105....
    So just what ARE you saying about my home waters, hmmmmm????

    I'm diggin' the 60. I have the 60, 10.5 and 12-24, and the 60 gets used 95% of the time around here. The majority of my diving is night diving - so the 60 just rocks.

    KD: Is there a way to stack diaptors in the port for the 60, to turn it into a UW telescope, like some of you folks do with the 105? I want more mag.

    ---
    Ken
    When its time to dive. DiveMatrix.com

  9. #9
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    kdietz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    218
    Hey Ken....no disrepect intended I wish I had your local waters to dive in all the time ....I'll be doing my first California cold water dive trip in August to the Channel Islands.

    I have been using a 2X teleconverter with the 60mm a little...you'll need a longer port for it to fit...it's a standard flat port, but longer than the normal 60mm port

    How's "our rig" doing?

    Karl
    Nikon D200....Ikelite iTTL housing...10.5mm...15mm...12-24mm...18-70mm...60mm...105mm...Dual DS-200's
    www.kdietz.com

  10. #10
    Yes I Did


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Mo2vation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    7,133
    Photos
    27

    Thumbs up hee hee...

    Quote Originally Posted by kdietz
    Hey Ken....no disrepect intended I wish I had your local waters to dive in all the time ....I'll be doing my first California cold water dive trip in August to the Channel Islands.

    I have been using a 2X teleconverter with the 60mm a little...you'll need a longer port for it to fit...it's a standard flat port, but longer than the normal 60mm port

    How's "our rig" doing?

    Karl
    SoCal diving rules.

    "Our Rig" is a blessing. Had it to Ike, as one of the cords flooded the electronics. They replaced the the synch cord, and upgraded the in-cam electronics, buffed the housing, lubed all the switches, etc... it performs flawlessly. And I, my friend, am not kind to it. I take it through the surf a couple of times a week, and its been amazing (although the 125's can be a little challenging to open when loaded with sand )

    I'll send you a PM to get recommendations for the TC's. I presume I just screw them on the front of the lens. I can't imagine needing another port, unless they're really thick. There is lots of room 'tween the port and the front of the lens, even when the lens is fully extended (well, as extended as a 60 gets...) Or is it not an actual "room in the port" thing and more a "placement of the flat front of the port in front of the lens" thing?

    BTW - your tips have been instrumental in me getting better shots every time out. I have so much to learn, but its getting better every time. I'm thinking about the 105 because I'm ready to move on from my Nudis to some of the smaller and more skiddish fishies.

    You digging the 200?

    Thanks!

    ---
    Ken
    When its time to dive. DiveMatrix.com

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. For 105mm Macro Lovers, the 105mm VR
    By RonFrank in forum The Nikon Niche
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 27th, 2006, 01:11 PM
  2. Please help with 105 mm Macro!
    By Cacia in forum The Nikon Niche
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: February 26th, 2006, 05:36 PM
  3. Macro 165 vs 330 ??
    By divegirl in forum The Olympus Outlet
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 27th, 2005, 07:59 AM
  4. Macro & WAL
    By fergyjohn in forum Underwater Photography
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 11th, 2004, 10:56 AM
  5. nikon 60mm micro vs 105mm micro
    By sillago in forum The Nikon Niche
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 30th, 2002, 10:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •