Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 100,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard you must register for a free account.
As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 3,000,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from 80,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
The Nikon video mode is actually using the live mode view with a good sensor to get that many "frames" to support video, and does it through the lens of an SLR, which is really what makes it unique. So you use existing glass to do things like fisheye wide angle and depth of field techniques. The DOF is where its really at, because standard HD video has a real deep DOF with everything in focus, vs. selective focus (which is more about cinematography than anything else). That part at least is very cool. The shortcomings of this, and why Nikon put it in a prosumer camera and not a top end model, is that the video has a 5 minute limit because that's the amount of time it takes for the sensor itself to overheat. Frankly, that's when the BS flag went up for me, when I'm burning the sensor out of a dSLR to take video I gotta wonder what the point is. Really, its not that its not a cool concept, its just the early implementation that has some serious problems. Not just the above, but that there is no sound input (n.b. I didn't say there weren't stereo audio inputs, there isn't even a mono input). And the camera form factor is pretty much crap for taking video in the first place. But there are some camera fora where this thing is being astroturfed to an extremely high level (funded of course by the powers that be at the big N). There are people so duped that they are saying the will sell all their Canon stuff (and the glass is where the costs are) which is crap because Canon, Sony, etc. will be all over this in 3/6/9/12 months. So IMO its not the be all/end all, but it is a step in a cool new direction. What really needs to happen (and I say this as a recovering shutterbug without any real education or experience with digital video) is that the digital video cameras need to get better lenses so the amateur cinematographer can "tell the story" with techniques like selective focus, etc. the same way the pros do. IMO (and again I'm not an expert in video but I am a huge fan) the story on the video end is being written by Big Red (which is the guy who started Oakley) starting with the Red One 4K and the new 5K Epic which hasn't been released yet.
As far as the GPS is concerned, I can see where optional recording of GPS coordinates would be cool. I did a weeklong amateur photoshoot in the Sierra Nevada's where the canisters were all numbered and the sites recorded with Sharpie on a 7.5 topo map. The thing is, you could do that with an iPhone app these days, it probably doesn't need to be built into the camera body. But again, a step in a cool direction.
Me, I'm still waiting for an L series 18-200 lens from Canon.
Then again, take this all with a grain of salt. Many years ago (pre-digital) I once took 71 pictures of the same flower (different lighting/glass/film) trying to get that "one" art shot.
The Nikon video mode is actually using the live mode view with a good sensor to get that many "frames" to support video, and does it through the lens of an SLR, which is really what makes it unique. So you use existing glass to do things like fisheye wide angle and depth of field techniques. The DOF is where its really at, because standard HD video has a real deep DOF with everything in focus, vs. selective focus (which is more about cinematography than anything else). That part at least is very cool. The shortcomings of this, and why Nikon put it in a prosumer camera and not a top end model, is that the video has a 5 minute limit because that's the amount of time it takes for the sensor itself to overheat. Frankly, that's when the BS flag went up for me, when I'm burning the sensor out of a dSLR to take video I gotta wonder what the point is. Really, its not that its not a cool concept, its just the early implementation that has some serious problems. Not just the above, but that there is no sound input (n.b. I didn't say there weren't stereo audio inputs, there isn't even a mono input). And the camera form factor is pretty much crap for taking video in the first place. But there are some camera fora where this thing is being astroturfed to an extremely high level (funded of course by the powers that be at the big N). There are people so duped that they are saying the will sell all their Canon stuff (and the glass is where the costs are) which is crap because Canon, Sony, etc. will be all over this in 3/6/9/12 months. So IMO its not the be all/end all, but it is a step in a cool new direction. What really needs to happen (and I say this as a recovering shutterbug without any real education or experience with digital video) is that the digital video cameras need to get better lenses so the amateur cinematographer can "tell the story" with techniques like selective focus, etc. the same way the pros do. IMO (and again I'm not an expert in video but I am a huge fan) the story on the video end is being written by Big Red starting with the Red One 4K and the new 5K Epic which hasn't been released yet.
As far as the GPS is concerned, I can see where optional recording of GPS coordinates would be cool. I did a weeklong amateur photoshoot in the Sierra Nevada's where the canisters were all numbered and the sites recorded with Sharpie on a 7.5 topo map. The thing is, you could do that with an iPhone app these days, it probably doesn't need to be built into the camera body. But again, a step in a cool direction.
Me, I'm still waiting for an L series 18-200 lens from Canon.
Then again, take this all with a grain of salt. Many years ago (pre-digital) I once took 71 pictures of the same flower (different lighting/glass/film) trying to get that "one" art shot.
I would like Canon to come out with something like 12-100 L, at a reasonable price..dream on
the story on the video end is being written by Big Red (which is the guy who started Oakley) starting with the Red One 4K and the new 5K Epic which hasn't been released yet.
Wow, that Big Red looks like quite the camera... but it's also a $17.5K ten pound behemoth, $22K with recommended lens. I'm thinking it's being marketed towards serious film hobbyists and film makers.
I'm personally glad the major camera mass producers are adding video to their DSLRs. Canon just announced 30fps 1080p on their new 5D release, with a time limit of course. I didn't know the reason for the time limits prior to reading your post. At least we'll have options for some short video without having to set up a whole new camera/housing. My suspicion is that if the video quality can get to where it competes with the 400 buck camcorders out there, you'll see a lot more people picking up DSLRs with video than making 2 separate purchases.
Video taken with the Nikon D90 suffers from "jelly movement". Here is a link to a video snippet (photobucket.com) that is making the rounds of some of the camera forums... As you can see the skew is completely unacceptable with any sort of panning. Apparently this is due to the slow read-reset rate of the CMOS imaging hardware used in dSLRs. I've had the chance to verify this for myself with the Nikon D90, and I'm told (but can't yet verify, obviously) that the announced-but-not-yet-shipping Canon 5D Mark II may suffer from the same technical shortcoming.
There are good digital video cameras out there today that will do 1080p that are relatively reasonably priced; at least for the time being to get tack-sharp photos and HD video we are going to have to have two types of cameras. The Holy Grail used to be if you could use your camera glass for a video camera (and cinematographically speaking, Kubrick's work in that area is still the gold standard, but in his case cost was no object). Now it seems everyone thinks that the Holy Grail ought to be to wire digital video out of a dSLR (and theoretically the concept is off-the-charts cool). Unfortunately the technology for the digital imaging sensors used in dSLRs just doesn't seem to be up to snuff -- not yet, anyway.
FWIW, it shouldn't surprise anyone that the people at Big Red are working this problem from the other side. Given that they already have engineered their own rapid read-reset CMOS sensors, they are going to be selling a digital video unit that will allegedly also do the highest quality still photos. A dSLR killer, if you will. If anyone could do that, it would be those guys.
Underwater Photography is not only a specialized type of photography, it is also a highly demanding one. The photographer needs to be a good scuba diver, swimmer and photographer all at the same time. Such a person is very hard to come by. Special equipments are also required for this type of photography.
Nikon has proven its reputation among professional photographers, being the top choice for many of them. DonÃÕ expect a Nikon professional digital camera to be inexpensive, but be sure that you are paying for quality, durability, functionality and reputation.The first Nikon cameras entered the market during the early days of film photography, and were using optics from Zeiss, a German optical maker that produced some of the absolute best camera lenses.
To avail free digital camera guide click on learndigitalphotographynow.com
Thank you for the link to the sample video. 24 fps is not ideal for fast action. With that in mind, the movement and motion during dive are relatively less rapid, so the diver can somewhat compensate by moving slowly. The higher the fps, the better it copes with action.
The 5 min limit on video is interesting to know as well. Anyone knows what's the file format?
It's great to see that the two distinct areas (video and photo) are coming together and recognized by the major manufacturers.
Thank you for the link to the sample video. 24 fps is not ideal for fast action. With that in mind, the movement and motion during dive are relatively less rapid, so the diver can somewhat compensate by moving slowly. The higher the fps, the better it copes with action.
24fps is what movies are shot at and what a Blu-Ray disk player replays at. Something I didn't know until I started researching a new flat panel television. So I don't think any bluring is due to the frame rate but maybe in how the camera handles the information.
George.
__________________
Stupid people die in stupid ways
Last edited by Buddha64; December 9th, 2008 at 08:18 AM.
Reason: Spelling
Linear Mode
