Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers diving from around the world. If the topic is related to scuba diving, this is the place to find divers talking about it. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
Find a dive buddy or communicate directly with scuba equipment manufacturers.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Dave Shaw using a 15.5 (with the Mark 16 Center Section) and Hammerhead Electronics, just set a world record of 270 Meters (rebreather/cave). His mix was 4% oxygen / 80% Helium.
While down in this cave, he decided to run a line out to explore some of the bottom, and found the body of a dead diver who had attempted to set an Open Circuit record in this very same cave 10 years ago.
Dave reported the HH performed "flawlessly", and followed the deco specified by the HH. He also had 2 vr3s as backup, one of which totally flooded.
Who was that who questioned the MK 15.5's capabilities a little while ago ... ?
Originally Posted by padiscubapro
Dave Shaw using a 15.5 (with the Mark 16 Center Section) and Hammerhead Electronics, just set a world record of 270 Meters (rebreather/cave). His mix was 4% oxygen / 80% Helium.
While down in this cave, he decided to run a line out to explore some of the bottom, and found the body of a dead diver who had attempted to set an Open Circuit record in this very same cave 10 years ago.
Thanks, Joe.
Do you know more about the dive profile (ie bootom time), which cave where, that sort of thing?
You can see the article on Divernet.com/new/stories/record011104.shtml
Opinion girl you'll be happy to know a Venra van Shaik set a record of 221m with the same dive group @ Boesmansgat Cave, South Africa.
"The [DCS] symptoms may well have been provoked by carrying out work at excessive depth."
Since the algorithm's on both the VR-3 and HH are both modified Haldanean, I propose that using a dual-phase model such as RGBM (eg more deep stops, less shallow stops) may have helped reduce the chance of DCS at that depth. Any comments on why he did not use Abyss or Vplanner tables? Would David Shaw venture to post his deco schedule or a trace from his HH?
"The [DCS] symptoms may well have been provoked by carrying out work at excessive depth."
Since the algorithm's on both the VR-3 and HH are both modified Haldanean, I propose that using a dual-phase model such as RGBM (eg more deep stops, less shallow stops) may have helped reduce the chance of DCS at that depth. Any comments on why he did not use Abyss or Vplanner tables? Would David Shaw venture to post his deco schedule or a trace from his HH?
The article failed to mention that the symptoms were started where he had his VR3 computers on his wrist.. Dave told Kevin he thought he might have had the computers on too tight and it felt like there may have been circulation restrictions..
The sysptoms may have cured on their own but he wasn't taking any chances..
RGBM wouldn't necessarily have given him an more deep stops... I run both models side by side ALL the time, so I can pretty much tell you with the right settings they track very closely and only deviate at the shallowest stops...
The VR3s were there as backup but the shape was determined by the HH and backup tables since the VR3 only does a limited number of deep stops before the "mandatory" stops.
On the deep stuff we ran in Indonesia, even with the extremely long decos the run times on the HH where just slightly longer compared to RGBM..
ALso the depth of the dive is beyond the calibration data of RGBM...
As depths go beyond 100m RGBM and VPM begin to diverge. This is becuase of the way they deal with skin tensions and the inteaction between boundaries and some other issues.. RGBM deals with these issues up to 180m, VPM hits its "wall" much shallower.. The fact is under the pressures listed, fluids and interaction with the varoius boundaries changes, and there is very little data to quantify it..
Last edited by padiscubapro; November 9th, 2004 at 06:37 AM.
"The [DCS] symptoms may well have been provoked by carrying out work at excessive depth."
Since the algorithm's on both the VR-3 and HH are both modified Haldanean, I propose that using a dual-phase model such as RGBM (eg more deep stops, less shallow stops) may have helped reduce the chance of DCS at that depth. Any comments on why he did not use Abyss or Vplanner tables? Would David Shaw venture to post his deco schedule or a trace from his HH?
I found out a bit more about the dive..
ALL the predive profiles were done with VPM, The 2 vr3s and nitek He were there strictly as timers..
in the divers words
"I was carrying two VR3’s and a Nitek He, but I was only going to be using them as bottom timers. The VR3 algorithm at this depth was not for me. The dive would have been far too long. The Nitek He could not cope with the fact I was diving a rebreather and would be bent in a flash, thus my decision to use VPM-B generated tables."
My guess is that he Had the HH on a very agressive GF to have it come close to VPM..
About the dcs here is a quote from the diver
"While resting I noted a dull ache in my left forearm. My Nitek He computer had been too tight around my wrist but I had not noticed at the time. It obviously had restricted the blood flow and now I was paying the consequences. The pain did not reduce with O2 therapy, or overnight so the next morning I elected to go to the Welkom chamber just in case. DAN decided it was best to undergo treatment in the chamber as a precaution. The pain went within two hours of starting the treatment."
About the performance of his equipment
"One VR3 had failed as I reached the bottom but the other soldiered on faithfully. I had tied off and was exploring, at a depth of 260m and descending. The unit was breathing well. The Hammerhead was keeping an accurate 1.3 PPO2 and I was relaxed and could almost not believe where I was."