Be a fan of ScubaBoard.com

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree3Likes
  • 3 Post By herman

Thread: Aqualung vs Atomic

 


  1. #1
    Registered


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    43
    Dives
    100 - 199

    Aqualung vs Atomic

    Hi All,
    I read one of the earlier posts where a gentleman in San Diego was looking at various regulators.

    I currently have an Aqualung Titan. I am considering getting a better regulator. I have noticed among other things that it tends to "scream" in colder water, like the mid to lower 50's. Not a comforting sound.

    So I am considering the Aqualung Legend or one of the Atomic regulators, either the ZX2 or B2. Although they are within the same price range, the Aqualung is more affordable because I can pay for about half of it with Sport Chalet gift cards. On the other hand, my gut feeling tells me that the Atomic regulators are better, and I like the swivels on those things. I don't know if my local LDS that sells the Atomix regs can also service them.

    So my question here is, does anyone have direct experience with both of these? How about any references to any articles comparing these regulators?

    And please don't get into any squabbles about "life support". Just details and facts about the regulators. Thanks for any help!

  2. #2
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    985
    Dives
    I'm a Fish!
    Photos
    17
    Personally I'd stick with the Titan.....the unusual noise should be cured by servicing and is an annoyance more than anything else and uncommon in diaphragm regs.
    If you have the base Titan 2nd stage you might try the balanced LX 2nd stage.
    Mid to low 50's is not especially cold even for a piston reg like the Atomic....colder than 50 I'd stick with a diaphragm 1st stage.

  3. #3
    ScubaBoard Veteran


    hasn't set a status.
     

    herman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Raleigh,North Carolina
    Posts
    7,660
    Dives
    500 - 999
    Photos
    1
    I agree with Fishpie, keep the Titan and get it serviced. The Titan/Conshelf design has a very long and solid history, there are no "better" designs. The hype about Atomics is just that hype, they are no better than other regs, esp. if we are discussing the first stage. If you have a standard Titan second stage (as opposed to the LX model) then one upgrade that would be an improvement would be to replace the second stage with either one of the many balanced barrel type second stages. The Titan LX, any of the Apex seconds or the HOGS would be good choices. If you stick with the LX or Apex the odds are the same tech can/will service both. If you change to a HOG or other brand service may be an issue but otherwise any second stage (except Poseidon) can be used. Don't get sucked into the brand X is better than brand Y BS, there is little real performance difference in modern first stages.
    herman

    www.ncdivers.com
    Oly C-5050, PT-015, Inon D180

  4. #4
    Scuba Instructor


    Shop Owner / PADI MSDT
    Instructor
     

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    319
    Dives
    500 - 999
    We recently became Atomic dealers. Prior to that we hadn't really investigated exactly why many consider Atomic to be good regulators. Right off, there is the fact that the seat and orifice on Atomic second stages are not seated together when the regs are not pressurized. This allows for a longer recommended period between servicing that other regulators that do not have this feature. A second interesting feature is the automatic diaphram driven venturi switch. Instead of having to switch this manually, it is done automatically as you descend deeper. Theoretically, this should reduce freeflows while also allowing easier breathing at depth.

    The Z2X with the swivel is a great deal at $499. The non-swivel version is an even better deal at $399.

  5. #5
    ScubaBoard Enthusiast


    the cat.
     

    Hatul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Tustin, California, United States
    Posts
    2,465
    Dives
    200 - 499
    Quote Originally Posted by divezonescuba View Post
    We recently became Atomic dealers. Prior to that we hadn't really investigated exactly why many consider Atomic to be good regulators. Right off, there is the fact that the seat and orifice on Atomic second stages are not seated together when the regs are not pressurized. This allows for a longer recommended period between servicing that other regulators that do not have this feature. A second interesting feature is the automatic diaphram driven venturi switch. Instead of having to switch this manually, it is done automatically as you descend deeper. Theoretically, this should reduce freeflows while also allowing easier breathing at depth.

    The Z2X with the swivel is a great deal at $499. The non-swivel version is an even better deal at $399.
    Interesting what you say, because those are also its negatives. The seat saver is a pain when rinsing, as it's like having the purge button pressed all the time when not pressurized.

    And the lack of the manual venturi switch: I have to be really careful when I take my reg out of my mouth as I've had some big free flows, and it's amazing how quickly the free flows empty the tank.

  6. #6
    ScubaBoard Contributor


    Has not set a "status"
     

    NCadiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    681
    You can't go wrong with either one of those regulators.

Similar Threads

  1. AQUALUNG VS ATOMIC!!! Who makes better regz?
    By SeaHound in forum Regulators
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: January 6th, 2012, 06:28 PM
  2. Atomic M1/B2 vs. Aqualung Legend
    By Offshore in forum Regulators
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 2nd, 2006, 07:08 AM
  3. atomic or aqualung
    By scooba doo in forum Regulators
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: February 12th, 2006, 10:43 AM
  4. atomic B2 or aqualung legend
    By skeet in forum Regulators
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: November 23rd, 2004, 08:04 AM
  5. atomic z1 or aqualung titan lx?
    By LakeMountD in forum New Divers and Those Considering Diving
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: October 9th, 2004, 02:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •