Spokane Instructor Homicide and Law suits

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

DandyDon

Colonoscopy Advocate
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
53,611
Reaction score
7,801
Location
One kilometer high on the Texas Central Plains
# of dives
500 - 999
See one of the mentioned accidents at http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/accidents-incidents/329064-redondo-washington-3-28-2010-a.html

From Detectives look into lawsuits involving Jan. 1 shooting victim - Spokesman.com - Jan. 22, 2012
Detectives have expanded the criminal investigation into the fatal shooting of a North Spokane mother to include two civil lawsuits naming the victim.
Each lawsuit involves separate scuba diving accidents; one left a man dead and another allegedly left a woman with brain damage.
Although no arrests have been made in the homicide case, Spokane County sheriff’s Detective Mike Drapeau said he is waiting on evidence to come back from the state crime lab and that investigators have focused on an individual who had been romantically involved with 34-year-old Kimberly R. Schmidt. She was discovered dead Jan. 1 with a gunshot wound to her head.
“There were two (persons of interest) who are related to her in some fashion. But he’s probably the only one right now,” Drapeau said, referring to the suspect who has been interviewed but not charged.
As part of the probe, detectives are looking into two civil lawsuits that name Schmidt and dive instructor Daniel R. Arteaga, who both worked part time for the Scuba Center of Spokane.
The most recent lawsuit was filed Wednesday by Spokane civil attorney Bob Dunn on behalf of Kimela Wyssman, who claims to have suffered brain damage and emotional distress after she had to be resuscitated following a dive with Schmidt and Arteaga on March 28, 2010.
Arteaga and Schmidt were notified about the pending suit two and a half weeks before Schmidt was found dead. Schmidt was expected to be a key witness in the case.
“We wanted the sheriff’s deputies to know these puzzle pieces, that we served the demand letter and a draft complaint … on Dec. 13,” Dunn said. “Then she was found dead on New Year’s Day.”
Scuba Center of Spokane part-owner Gordon J. Mankin, who is also named in the suit, said Thursday he was unaware of the latest lawsuit.
Arteaga “doesn’t work for us on a full-time basis. He just teaches a few classes,” said Mankin, who declined further comment. Efforts to reach Arteaga this week were unsuccessful.
Schmidt’s mother found Schmidt dead in her home at 37 E. Regina Ave. on Jan. 1. A lamp had been knocked over and detectives found blood smeared on the wall near the head of the bed, which indicated she had been moved.
Detectives seized a cloth drawstring bag with a gun barrel sticking out. Drapeau said he believes a .25-caliber semi-automatic handgun was the homicide weapon, but he has to wait for the lab to confirm it.
Schmidt’s mother, Toni Schmidt, declined to comment on the lawsuits or the criminal investigation Friday, but she and her husband, Randall Schmidt, said they remain confident the case will be solved. Toni Schmidt said her daughter loved the ocean and was planning to scuba dive in Manila, Philippines, on a business trip next month.
It’s unclear how long Kimberly Schmidt worked for Scuba Center of Spokane, which agreed in November to make a confidential payment in a 2008 lawsuit filed by Maureen Maher-Gray, the widow of Spokane insurance executive John W. Gray. He was 53 when he died on a training dive with Arteaga and Schmidt on March 29, 2008.
The Grays took part in the training dive directed by Arteaga as part of a program to receive their diving certification from Scuba Center of Spokane.
After experiencing trouble on his first dive, John Gray took part in a second dive in Hood Canal. During one of the descents, Gray became separated from the group. A third-party diver – not one of the instructors – found Gray not breathing.
According to the suit, Arteaga, Schmidt and Mankin were unaware Gray was missing until they surfaced and saw rescue efforts to resuscitate him.
In the separate Wyssman suit, filed this week, Wyssman claimed that she similarly had progressed through the dive instructions from Scuba Center of Spokane and took part in a dive on March 28, 2010, in King County.
The group of divers went about 40 or 50 feet down into the water, which had very poor visibility.
“As the group was getting their bearings, it was noted by several student divers that Defendant Arteaga had disappeared,” the suit states.
Prior to diving deeper, Wyssman began having trouble with water in her mask and was unable to keep her breathing apparatus in her mouth. Schmidt, who dove with the group as a dive control specialist, noticed Wyssman’s trouble, released her weights and “shot” her to the surface.
Before Schmidt could get Wyssman to shore, she lost consciousness.
“Once Defendant Schmidt removed Ms. Wyssman from the water, resuscitation efforts were initiated,” the suit states.
As in the Gray case, Arteaga apparently had no knowledge of the emergency and again became aware of the problem only after he saw efforts to resuscitate Wyssman.
“It was at this point that Defendant Arteaga instructed the rest of the students not to speak to any of the news crews that were showing up and to avoid allowing themselves to be identified and/or filmed,” the suit states.
 
Wow, that is convoluted.

Here is a case in point for why a weight belt should not be removed at depth if there is any other way to solve the issue...
 
Crazy stuff.. I was having a hard time keeping track of who was who..

But 50 feet on a training dive in murky water? is that the norm?
 
Wow, that is convoluted.

Here is a case in point for why a weight belt should not be removed at depth if there is any other way to solve the issue...

Either that, or a good case better training.

Prior to diving deeper, Wyssman began having trouble with water in her mask and was unable to keep her breathing apparatus in her mouth. Schmidt, who dove with the group as a dive control specialist, noticed Wyssman’s trouble, released her weights and “shot” her to the surface.

That's just really sad.

Panic caused by a leaky mask is a sign that the diver should not have been in the water. Someone who can't clear their mask and can't safely do an emergency ascent should never have been taken into open water. In fact, someone who thinks that mask clearing is significatly more stressful than nose-blowing or burping should have been kept in the shalllow end of the pool for as much additional training as necessary.

flots.
 
Crazy stuff.. I was having a hard time keeping track of who was who..

But 50 feet on a training dive in murky water? is that the norm?
It was a little difficult to follow. The followup story & video helped some...

DiveCon Schmidt and Instructor Arteaga had a romantic history, both very involved along with the same shop in both accidents. In the first, the student went missing, was found by an outside party, but died. In the last one, Arteaga went missing and Schmidt attempted the rescue.

After the recent filing of a suit on the second one, Schmidt was murdered and the police are interested in Arteaga. Don't know what their thinking is.

Puget Sound diving is murky. On the A&I thread it was said she was on OW dive 2 with a 40 ft limit but I guess she could have slipped deeper.
 
After the recent filing of a suit on the second one, Schmidt was murdered and the police are interested in Arteaga. Don't know what their thinking is.

I suspect their thinking may have something to do with this statement from the first article above:

article:
Schmidt was expected to be a key witness in the case.
 
I suspect their thinking may have something to do with this statement from the first article above:
Well, based on the limited info given on the accident, I can imagine her maybe blaming him for vanishing, him possibly blaming her for dropping the weight belt on a student having difficulties with a reg and possibly holding breath, and perhaps hard feelings enhanced by past romantic involvements - even tho I haven't had TV in over 20 years. That's still a stretch for gunfire, neither of them were shop owners - but possible. People get shot for lots less.

Their professional liability insurance coverages will still be liable on both. This could max out those cases.
 
Wow, that is convoluted.

Here is a case in point for why a weight belt should not be removed at depth if there is any other way to solve the issue...

You are soo right!!! What idiot would dump a weight belt like that and not have control of their class??????
 
You are soo right!!! What idiot would dump a weight belt like that and not have control of their class??????

That really depends on student's (diver's?) level of competence. None of this stuff should have been an issue for anybody qualified to for the deep end of the pool. They're all minor issues. Water in the mask should have been zero stress, and should not have caused any problems. Likewise, ditching a student's a weightbelt is not an excessivly risky move for anybody who remembers the part about "don't hold your breath".

I'm not sure why the divecon ditched the weights, but it should have not been a problem if the instructor had properly verified the student's comfort and skills-competence while in the pool and monitored the student in open water. It should never have reached the point where the student paniced.

flots.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom