Doing underwater photography for about 5 years now, I want to make people looking for a good compact camera aware of some of what I think is a serious flaw of Sony´s last high resolution compact. Their RX100II is a nice camera on the surface. As a more than 10years Canon user, I succumbed to their lures of specs and after some adjusting, I was able to crank out semi-SLR quality pics on the surface. But taking the thingy down was another story.
I know, what kind of pics I want to take. Big game (rare) and "seascapes" (coral with nice colors, blue water as the sky, fishies swirling around the "hills"). With any Canon compact (S90, S95, S100), I had quite some awesome results I liked. But with my trusty S100 the latest one, I wanted to have some better resolution and low light capabilities. So I thought, putting the RX100II as my newest piece of my collection down could only be even better. BOY, WAS I WRONG !!! . Despite that Sony gives you at the first glance similar control of WB, all I can get is "blue-green-gray". Setting color temp to 9900K and maxing out the WB adjustments to all A/M, this is all I got (see examples from a 30ft reef dive with almost perfect viz and light conditions.
If anybody has any suggestions, what I did wrong, feel free to jump at me. Although I think, it´s Sony´s "magical color sauce", which is not be able to cope with any underwater environment.
I did some research and all the acceptable underwater pics I found where macro shots and some reef shots with obviously the help of artificial lighting.
My verdict: If you want to make artificial lightened macro or forensic underwater pics, this might be your tool of choice. If you want to make colorful pics, scrap it !!! I will try to get an additional HW red filter (Which will steal of course some light) and give it another shot. But as of now, I can not recommend this camera for my style of underwater photography !
See for yourself ! The IMG file is from my old S100, the DSC file is from the Sony.
I know, what kind of pics I want to take. Big game (rare) and "seascapes" (coral with nice colors, blue water as the sky, fishies swirling around the "hills"). With any Canon compact (S90, S95, S100), I had quite some awesome results I liked. But with my trusty S100 the latest one, I wanted to have some better resolution and low light capabilities. So I thought, putting the RX100II as my newest piece of my collection down could only be even better. BOY, WAS I WRONG !!! . Despite that Sony gives you at the first glance similar control of WB, all I can get is "blue-green-gray". Setting color temp to 9900K and maxing out the WB adjustments to all A/M, this is all I got (see examples from a 30ft reef dive with almost perfect viz and light conditions.
If anybody has any suggestions, what I did wrong, feel free to jump at me. Although I think, it´s Sony´s "magical color sauce", which is not be able to cope with any underwater environment.
I did some research and all the acceptable underwater pics I found where macro shots and some reef shots with obviously the help of artificial lighting.
My verdict: If you want to make artificial lightened macro or forensic underwater pics, this might be your tool of choice. If you want to make colorful pics, scrap it !!! I will try to get an additional HW red filter (Which will steal of course some light) and give it another shot. But as of now, I can not recommend this camera for my style of underwater photography !
See for yourself ! The IMG file is from my old S100, the DSC file is from the Sony.
Attachments
Last edited: