Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 100,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard you must register for a free account.
As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 3,000,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from 80,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
Technical Diving SpecialtiesAdvanced and focused aspects of scuba diving with a technical training edge, ranging from caverns and caves, public safety diving, wreck penetrations to decompression diving and everything in between.
Looking for opinions here...
I understand redundant buoyancy is advised for doubles and its necessary for most if not all of the tech training agencies. I get that and its obvious why redundant buoyancy is needed for sets of big steels.
However is it really necessary for a set of al80's? Would diving wet with a set of al80's and a single blader be as marginal as I am led to believe?
Does anybody here dive doubled up al80's wet and with no redundant buoyancy?
Are you dead yet?
you can always slip an extra wing behind your plate
as for double AL80's ... you're gonna need A TON of weight to avoid doing the missile breach out of the water at the end of the dive
seriously, i don't know ... i don't know anyone who dives double AL80s
__________________
this street guy selling cheap rings said i looked like a Russian Orthodox Priest. i'm working on my self-esteem, so i said, those priests must be some sexy b--ches.
actually, twin AL 80's are pretty common 'tech' tanks at lots of dive destinations.....I did a week of cave diving a few yrs ago in Akumal, Mexico and all they had was a TON of AL 80 twinsets and everyone seemed perfectly fine with them.....Mexican caves tend to be shallow so twin AL 80's provided enough bottom time. Also, a fair number of 'tech' liveaboards offer twin Al 80's as the largest capacity gas option. AL 80's are cheap, they don't have the high maintainance/rust issues of steel tanks....and they're weight out of the water is 'reasonable' at something like 80 lbs with tanks/bands/manifold...the 'average' diver these days is in his/her mid-40's, especially the ones with enough income to tech dive AND travel expenses...so the twin AL 80's are a sufficient compromise between cost/weight/capacity.
Personally I like steel tanks (own 9 singles/ plus 2 'small' steel twinsets) but I can't take them on a plane with me, so I can only dive them locally in the lake/quarry...or road trip them down to the coast /TX Flower Gardens.
...with respect to 'redundency' , I'm a big fan of dual-bladder wings, just like I'd rather fly in a plane with 2 engines versus 1 engine....doubles my chances for coming home! The DIR crowd isn't crazy about dual wings, however, they are more 'acceptable' if you leave the back-up (right post) inflator hose disconnected/tucked away and only connect it IF you have a wing failure and need to use it.
this street guy selling cheap rings said i looked like a Russian Orthodox Priest. i'm working on my self-esteem, so i said, those priests must be some sexy b--ches.
As said earlier twin ali 80's are pretty common especially in tropical environments and often its wetsuit rather than drysuit. Your DSMB is a great backup bouyancy devise. Sounds crazy, not really. Its limited in that its an open water (not caves and not inside wrecks) tool. Most DSMB's have a purge valve at the top so you can adjust the amount of gas in it. We are talking a 'last option available' but it can and has been used.
Thanks for the replies guys...but what I was getting at was if the redundant buoyancy was really necessary or is it more for good diving practices when moving toward bigger steel doubles.
Based on my calculations i'm anticipating carrying 20lbs of lead. If I lose my wing at depth and have to swim up a set of lets say half full al80's I should have no problem doing it after ditching 20lbs. I might even be so buoyant by dropping all of it that the ascent may become an issue in and of itself. Is there something im not anticipating here? Are my assumptions baseless?
I dive double Al80's in Mexico with a 5 mil suit and 2 mil hooded vest, with a 6 lb V-weight. Of course, I'm in a cave, so if I had a total wing failure (hard to do, really) I could crawl out
__________________
My dive journal can be read here, and a current dive blog HERE
I dive double Al80's in Mexico with a 5 mil suit and 2 mil hooded vest, with a 6 lb V-weight.
that's not bad at all
__________________
this street guy selling cheap rings said i looked like a Russian Orthodox Priest. i'm working on my self-esteem, so i said, those priests must be some sexy b--ches.
Double 80's with a SS plate/Manifold/Regs are close to neutral when empty. So you only need to carry enough lead to sink your suit.
__________________
MacT on being on TSN NHL panel.
"I'm happy to finally be among the experts where the issues are many and solutions obvious," said MacTavish, a native of London, ON. "I appreciate TSN providing a safe haven for unemployed coaches, as we rehabilitate ourselves towards future employability."
This member has said "Thank you." to JeffG for this useful post:
Linear Mode
