Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 205,000 divers diving from around the world. If the topic is related to scuba diving, this is the place to find divers talking about it. To gain full access to ScubaBoard (and make this large box go away) you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 5,500,000 posts.
Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
Post your own photos or view from well over 100,000 user submitted images.
Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
Find a dive buddy or communicate directly with scuba equipment manufacturers.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
NEW for 2014 Access SBlogbook for members. It allows you to directly upload data from your dive computer, validate your logs digitally, link your dives to photos, videos, dive centers (9,000 on file), fishes (14,000 on file) and much more.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.
I recognize that this question might more appropriately fit in some other forum, but I am curious to get the Swamp Divers perspective on this (even recognizing that most of have probably never seen Lanier).
I keep reading this story about the drought in Georgia (Atlanta area) and how Lake Lanier is precipitously low, loss of drinking water, imminent catastrophe for Atlanta, etc. First the obvious, it is indeed an impending catastrophe for the folks in Atlanta, I pray that they get lots of rain soon. They definitely need it. Everyone needs drinking water.
I really want the perspective of the Swamp Divers because it would seem to me that the character of our Texas lakes is markedly different from Lake Lanier. I keep reading stories about how Lanier is about to dry up completely. Then the next sentence says the lake is only down 19 ft. ???? Does this sound odd to anyone besides me?
"If it doesn't hurt, it itches" -- my friend Phil
"This having fun thing is a lot of hard work." -- richerso
There are so many factors that need to be considered to figure out if the Lanier levels are in the same league as the Travis levels were earlier this year. A real quick look leads me to believe it is equivalent.
Lake Lanier max depth ~ 160 feet
Lake Travis max depth ~ 200 feet
Making a big assumption about bottom profiles (river beds - narrow at the bottom) I'd think that the 40 foot greater depth of Travis amounts to a small water volume so we can call them close to equivalent in depth vs water volume.
Lake Lanier surface area ~ 38,000 acres
Lake Travis surface area ~ 19,000 acres
This makes Lanier about twice the size of Travis, so a drop of 20 feet in Lanier is about equal to the 40 ft drop in Travis this past year. Add to that the fact that Lanier provides water to 3 million + in Atlanta, and I'd say yes - they should be pretty concerned about a 19 foot drop.
Save the earth... It's the only planet with chocolate.
Rock Paper Scissors Lizard Spock!