tamas970
Contributor
- Messages
- 610
- Reaction score
- 59
- # of dives
- 100 - 199
I plan to start with fluorescence photography as well and considering two types of lightning:
#1: DIY continous LED light using a 50W 460-470nm module - I have a contact, who can manufacture an aluminium housing, battery compartment etc.
#2: Blue filters, cutting off at <470nm for my double INON S2000's - Here I am looking for the right filters that transmit >90% of the blue (below 470nm) and <5% above 480nm. I browsed through the Lee brochure but haven't found any that fulfills my criteria.
Which one would be the more efficient for photography?
In normal photography I'd never take a video light instead of strobes but here the LED version doesn't waste energy on unused colors while ~80% of the strobe's energy is not used. further advantage of the LED version is the video and focus assist capability.
#1: DIY continous LED light using a 50W 460-470nm module - I have a contact, who can manufacture an aluminium housing, battery compartment etc.
#2: Blue filters, cutting off at <470nm for my double INON S2000's - Here I am looking for the right filters that transmit >90% of the blue (below 470nm) and <5% above 480nm. I browsed through the Lee brochure but haven't found any that fulfills my criteria.
Which one would be the more efficient for photography?
In normal photography I'd never take a video light instead of strobes but here the LED version doesn't waste energy on unused colors while ~80% of the strobe's energy is not used. further advantage of the LED version is the video and focus assist capability.