Untitled Document




Become a Fan of
ScubaBoard.com

 

Register today and make this ad disappear!

Welcome to ScubaBoard, an online scuba diving forum community where you can join over 100,000 divers from around the world discussing all things related to Scuba Diving. To gain full access to ScubaBoard you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Participate in over 500 dive topic forums and browse from over 3,000,000 posts.
  • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
  • Post your own photos or view from 80,000 user submitted images.
  • Gain access to our free classifieds marketplace to buy, sell and trade gear, travel and services.
  • Use the calendar to organize your events and enroll in other members' events.
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the ScubaBoard Support Team.

Go Back   ScubaBoard > Underwater Activities and Specialties > Underwater Photography
Forums Register Today's Posts Calendar

Underwater Photography Discuss Underwater Photography from taking photos to photo equipment, sell your old gear, see what your favourite camera manufacturers are coming out with or just find something fascinating to view.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old April 5th, 2006, 10:29 PM   #1
New Member

Status
Profile Info
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Stats
Posts: 11
Lens choice?? WA vs. zoom?

I apologize in advance if this subject has been covered in the past, but I'm new to this...

I'm going to purchase the Ikelite housing for my Canon Rebel XT and am unsure about what lens to get. I was using an Olympus point n' shoot digital and enjoyed being able to zoom in and out. I don't think at this point that I'd be interested in macro. Now I'm reading in various posts either shooting wide angle or macro?

What about using the standard 18-55mm zoom lens with a flat port? Would I be disappointed with this setup? Would it be better to go with a 10-22 WA lens and the specific 6" dome port? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Happy diving.
RLXFXR is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 5th, 2006, 11:11 PM   #2
Missing Diva.
 
alcina's Avatar

Status
Profile Info
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western Australia
Logged Dives: I'm a Fish!
Stats
Posts: 11,305
Photos: 3294
Thanks Received: 219
It totally depends on what type of shots you like.

You might like to start with the 18-55 and see what you like and what you feel is missing. Then add that later.

I can't imagine not shooting macro, myself, so went with two different macro lenses. I also picked up the Sigma 10-20 WA. I have a love/hate with WA so don't use it much yet
alcina is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 5th, 2006, 11:13 PM   #3
ScubaBoard Supporter
 
ssra30's Avatar

Status
Go Red - Support SB!
Profile Info
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Thailand
Stats
Posts: 1,830
Photos: 40
There is no dSLR lens that will cover wide angle as well as macro so you pretty much will have to choose what you want to do during that particular dive. Basically the medium range zoom such as 18-55 does not really focus close enough for it to be considered a macro lens. I am not all that familiar with Canon line of lens but the closest medium range lens that can almost do macro is the Nikkor 17-55mm which can focus down to 14 inches.

Most people will either do wide angle with 10-22, use the 17-40 ro 18-55 for fish portrait type shot and 100mm macro or 60mm macro for macro shots.
__________________
Nikon D2X, Subal Housing,dual Ikelite DS125, 10.5mm, 12-24mm, 60mm macro and 70-180mm macro
my website
ssra30 is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 6th, 2006, 12:41 AM   #4
Divemaster
 
justin-branam's Avatar

Status
Badge
Profile Info
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NW Houston, Texas
Logged Dives: 200 - 499
Stats
Posts: 209
Photos: 1
Trader Rating: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssra30
There is no dSLR lens that will cover wide angle as well as macro so you pretty much will have to choose what you want to do during that particular dive.

...but on the contrary, if you want to plop down the cash, you could always go with the "Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Autofocus Lens". id say that would get you the most amount of coverage. of course you are looking at $1200 for the lens. you could also look at the 24-70L for $1100, which i know i will be adding it to my collection shortly.

and i understand the 24 may not be the widest angle of view, it is still considered a wide angle lens, and could get you a nice amount of reef in a picture.
__________________
Underwater Photography by Justin Branam
I can resist everything except temptation

PADI Divemaster #189988
justin-branam is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 6th, 2006, 02:03 AM   #5
Photographer
 
Warren_L's Avatar

Status
Badge
Profile Info
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Logged Dives: 1,000 - 2,499
Stats
Posts: 2,915
Photos: 43
Thanks Received: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by justin-branam
...but on the contrary, if you want to plop down the cash, you could always go with the "Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Autofocus Lens". id say that would get you the most amount of coverage. of course you are looking at $1200 for the lens. you could also look at the 24-70L for $1100, which i know i will be adding it to my collection shortly.

and i understand the 24 may not be the widest angle of view, it is still considered a wide angle lens, and could get you a nice amount of reef in a picture.
A 24mm-105mm would give you lots of flexibility, but for me, I would still want to be able to go much wider than 24mm.
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it - Aristotle

www.warrenlophotography.com
Warren_L is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 6th, 2006, 07:01 AM   #6
dbh
Senior Member
 
dbh's Avatar

Status
Profile Info
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: KY
Stats
Posts: 751
Thanks Received: 12
Trader Rating: 1
whichever lens(es) you decide on, make sure a port is available from the manufacturer that plan on housing your camera with. Not all lenses are support by all mfgs.


Dave
__________________
Nikon D300, Inon Z240 (2), Seatool ND300 http://reefphoto.com

http://www.myunderwaterworld.com
dbh is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 7th, 2006, 01:13 AM   #7
ScubaBoard Supporter
 
ssra30's Avatar

Status
Go Red - Support SB!
Profile Info
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Thailand
Stats
Posts: 1,830
Photos: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by justin-branam
...but on the contrary, if you want to plop down the cash, you could always go with the "Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Autofocus Lens". of reef
This lens is not really sufficient for wide angle or macro photography at all.
It is going to be used on a cropped sensor camera so 24mm is going to be more like 36mm (sorry, can't remeber if Rebel XT is 1.5 or 1.6x cropped sensor but whatever it is, 36mm is close enough).
The lens minimum focusing distance is about 16 inches, it certainly would not be my preferred lens for macro. So this is going to be another one of those in between lens, not really wide enough for good wide angle shot and not focus close enough for real macro work but should be a pretty good lens for fish portrait type picture.
__________________
Nikon D2X, Subal Housing,dual Ikelite DS125, 10.5mm, 12-24mm, 60mm macro and 70-180mm macro
my website
ssra30 is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 7th, 2006, 01:28 AM   #8
Photographer
 
Warren_L's Avatar

Status
Badge
Profile Info
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Logged Dives: 1,000 - 2,499
Stats
Posts: 2,915
Photos: 43
Thanks Received: 7
I believe the Rebel XT is a 1.6 crop factor, so a 24mm would have about an equivalent viewing angle of a 38mm lens on a 35mm SLR. Definitely would want something wider.
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it - Aristotle

www.warrenlophotography.com
Warren_L is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2006, 12:04 AM   #9
Stop, Think, Act!
 
RonFrank's Avatar

Status
Profile Info
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Conifer, CO
Logged Dives: 200 - 499
Stats
Photos: 235
Thanks Received: 180
Trader Rating: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by justin-branam
.. always go with the "Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Autofocus Lens".

and i understand the 24 may not be the widest angle of view, it is still considered a wide angle lens, and could get you a nice amount of reef in a picture.
Unless one is shooting a 1DsMarkII, the 24mm lens is not wide at all. At 36mm or narrower, it's not ideal for UW photogaphy IMO.
__________________
Ron
Protect Florida's Precious BARRIER REEF! go HERE to Help
My PBASE Gallery is HERE
Looking for Used Gear, checkout SCUBA SITEMASH
RonFrank is online now
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2006, 12:17 AM   #10
The Pasaway Menace
 
Diver Dennis's Avatar

Status
Profile Info
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philippines - Canada
Logged Dives: 2,000 - 2,999
Stats
Photos: 501
Thanks Received: 78
I agree with the wider angle vote. I use the Canon 10 -22mm but make sure you get the 8" port,, the 6" does give you very soft edges. I did pick up the 17 - 85mm for medium shots with the zoom knob on the port but I have not tried it yet.
Diver Dennis is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Add to your Facebook!Twitter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon 18-35mm Lens & Aquatica Zoom Gear mjh Classifieds: Photography 2 July 26th, 2005 12:49 AM
Full zoom with macro lens. What's wrong? sprain The Canon Corner 12 June 27th, 2005 03:20 AM
Lens on the 4040 Zoom flounderboy The Olympus Outlet 1 July 30th, 2004 10:38 PM
C5050 Owners Question about lens and zoom Scubatooth Underwater Photography 12 December 30th, 2003 02:49 PM
Zoom Lens aquamann Underwater Photography 3 December 21st, 2003 06:55 PM


Quick Style Chooser:

Powered by: vBulletin. Copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
© 2000-2009 All content is copyrighted to ScubaBoard.com, except for the Photo Gallery and under prior arrangements.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 AM.
Syndicate this content on your website with rss or javascript data feeds.
ScubaBoard is a Founding Member of the UnderWater Network

© 2000-2009 All content is copyrighted to ScubaBoard.com, except for the Photo Gallery and under prior arrangements. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1