Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
[/QUOTE]I think that you may be thinking of regulators. A $12,000 watch is not "dive equipment". If you are lucky enough to be able to afford something like that, why would you take it diving at all, especially if that means that it requires annual service? I mean, I have a Thomas Hart Benton oil, that I love, but I don't laminate it and take it with me underwater.
You attributed somebody else's quote regarding "spending a few hundred annually on a service etc. is cheap insurance." I never said this. Somebody else did. On the contrary, I disagree on the need the for an annual service for a dive watch. It is ridiculous, expensive and unnecessary.
A lot of mechanical watches can be very accurate and if you're into watches (people who buy mechanical watches usually are) you know what to do to get it to be. Some watches, even chronometer certified still either loose a little or gain a little while being worn, but you can regulate buy figuring out what position to leave it in when not being worn like over night. Depending on movement some position will result if a little speeding up or slowing down. A form of regulation.
Mechanical watches are fascinating engineering wonders that can be so complex it boggles the mind, especially those complex complications that were calculated and designed without the aid of computers. Love them and the history.
I have one quartz watch, but will never buy another. I plan on treating myself to a nice dive watch one day and it will be my little pal on dives with me.
It's surprising to hear all the criticism of absolutely beautifully engineered and constructed machines like Rolex watches and of folks who choose to dive with them. I've got a couple including an explorer 2, which I wore to Mongolia this past summer, and a modern ceramic no date submariner. They are wonderful devices, comfortable to wear, rugged and beautiful. They both keep time to better than 1/2 second per day. I may take my sub on my next dive trip, I'll have to wait and see how I feel. Of course a rolex submariner is not an essential piece of dive equipment but I have no criticism of folks who choose to dive with them.
If you aren't into fine watches, that's ok. But, you shouldn't hate on those that are. A fine watch is a pleasure to wear and use, kind of like a really good audio system.
So the watches haven't changed (except to improve), but the kinds of people who typically own them has.
How so?
Typical owners were frequently divers who dove with their watches, back in the hallowed days of diving. With no computers, there was no real choice but to do so.
This is no longer the case.