I have to chime in here.
As Mike Ferrara stated, the PSTC is PADI, NAUI, IDC, YSCUBA, etc. Thye created the MINIMUM standards to achieve certification.
Unfortunately, if an instructor simply follows those MINIMUM standards, the result will most likely be a diver with sub-par skills (not sub-standard since the "standards" were met), with very little understanding of what diving is really about.
It is sad that some people take any kind of negative comment/statement about PADI or any other organization and call it "bashing".
I don't believe I bash PADI even though I believe that PADI and other agencies have some serious shortcomings in their training phylosophies.
I voice these concerns to PADI directly and I also discuss them with other dive professionals from PADI and other agencies.
Many have stated that it is the instructor that makes the diver and to a point I agree. Where we part company is when we reach the point that an agency may have created a training program that places so many limits and restrictions on an instructor as to stifle his/her ability to create a safe, well trained diver.
Though i have never met Walter or Mike Ferrara, I have learned a great deal from them that has made me a better PADI instructor. I admit without shame that I have taken a great deal of what they and others have posted and added it to my own training cirriculum in order to meet my own desires of the student divers I want to put in the water.
In my estimation, every agencies MINIMUM standards are too low. The minimums allow for the certification of divers with sud-par skills and not enough knowledge of the effects of diving on our bodies and how to deal with those.
Again, this is IF an instructor adheres only to the minimums and doesn't put enough into it.
My standard is to train someone well enough to dive with my daughters or wife.
As Mike Ferrara stated, the PSTC is PADI, NAUI, IDC, YSCUBA, etc. Thye created the MINIMUM standards to achieve certification.
Unfortunately, if an instructor simply follows those MINIMUM standards, the result will most likely be a diver with sub-par skills (not sub-standard since the "standards" were met), with very little understanding of what diving is really about.
It is sad that some people take any kind of negative comment/statement about PADI or any other organization and call it "bashing".
I don't believe I bash PADI even though I believe that PADI and other agencies have some serious shortcomings in their training phylosophies.
I voice these concerns to PADI directly and I also discuss them with other dive professionals from PADI and other agencies.
Many have stated that it is the instructor that makes the diver and to a point I agree. Where we part company is when we reach the point that an agency may have created a training program that places so many limits and restrictions on an instructor as to stifle his/her ability to create a safe, well trained diver.
Though i have never met Walter or Mike Ferrara, I have learned a great deal from them that has made me a better PADI instructor. I admit without shame that I have taken a great deal of what they and others have posted and added it to my own training cirriculum in order to meet my own desires of the student divers I want to put in the water.
In my estimation, every agencies MINIMUM standards are too low. The minimums allow for the certification of divers with sud-par skills and not enough knowledge of the effects of diving on our bodies and how to deal with those.
Again, this is IF an instructor adheres only to the minimums and doesn't put enough into it.
My standard is to train someone well enough to dive with my daughters or wife.