FACT: I perform better, am more alert, have better cognitive and motor skills (there, see how I removed "*feel* better") after diving on EAN32.
FACT: for a given dive that I do, EAN32 reduces nitrogen loading compared to air.
Good enough.
Please understand that we don't always need the scientific method to understand things. The scientific method is but ONE way to gain knowledge. For example, there have never been any double blind, repeatable, placebo blah blah studies that will tell me if I will feel worse or better if I am hit by a semi truck at 100mph while crossing the road...yet I can be pretty sure I know will feel worse. Sure, an Einsteinian will say there is a non-zero probability that I will pass through the truck, but...
VI
By what method(s) do you measure your improved performance, alertness, cognition, and motor skills? Sounds like you still only
feel those improvements.
Can't dispute with your statement about EAN32 reducing Nitrogen loading, but that by no means implies a cause and effect relationship between Nitrox and improved cognition, etc.
It's plausible that there is a connection, but it's equally plausible that you are simply justifying the $$$ you spent on the Enriched Air course and the $$ you spent on the Nitrox fill by convincing yourself you get these tangible benefits. It's also plausible that you got in a much
longer dive on Nitrox with the extended NDL which could certainly contribute to a much more positive experience as you watch the air divers having to surface.
No, the scientific method isn't the only way to gain knowledge. Experience and common sense are also important and make it unnecessary to stand in front of a speeding truck all in the name of a scientific endeavor. If, in your experience, you get these benefits that you mentioned and you are willing to accept the added risk and cost of Enriched Air, that's awesome.:dance3:
However (there's always a 'however', isn't there?), it would be irresponsible to promote Nitrox in a way that would lead people without the necessary knowledge and experience into believing that they will benefit from these unsubstantiated claims. By no means do I remotely intend to suggest that this is what you are doing. I apologize in advance if that is the impression I'm giving.
There are, unfortunately, enough people out there who would take advantage of the debate to promote Nitrox as the
Feel Good gas to make a buck or two. I would hope that a diver who is thinking about taking an Enriched Air course is a bit skeptical about claims that are, at best, speculative before spending the money and accepting the added risk of diving with Nitrox.
I see no reason to be dismissive about using a bit of well-designed science and inquiry to shed some light on the subject if it means people can make more informed decisions... but maybe I'm just being an Einsteinian