So, if the purpose of a dual bladder is to have a redundant lift source. When is an instance that you ever have to worry about a negative descent caused by the bladder? It will never be the bladder causing the descent, but the absence of additional lift and buoyancy control to counter the additional weight you carry in gear/lead/tank. Therefore, should the bladder be compromised, you should dump most of your ditch-able weight and swim to the surface controlling your ascent to the best of your ability. Once on the surface, stabilize using your buddy, and correct the problem or ditch the rig. In the end, should the argument not be for a balanced rig that requires no additional ballast or a substantial source of ditch-able weight? As that would be apt to cause more problems and be the more accurate solution to a compromised bladder, not including a runaway inflator that a redundant bladder will not help with.