Search results

from what i hear, the trimetal id not popular like the atomics or any other brands....rodale tested these things and they scored the same as the z2 and t2, anywho, as long as i can breath underwater, it's good enough for me

well, the spec book describe them to be nearly the same make up, ehh i dunno, good reg none the less

my wife and i use atomic z2s, bought one and won one, from the specs list, it's the same as a b2 without swivel which you can add on from atomic for 100 bucks, anywho, i've used mine and i like it more than the tusas for sure

why not go with an atomic z2? the new z series is practically a b2 without swivel hoses and just a tad heavier than the t2. but in rodales diving magazine, it ranks top in lab and user testing going along side another very good reg, the tri-metal. they're $399 for z2 and $375 for the xs...

that picture is linked if you check the properties, i do not download pictures off the web

yeah, i just bought one last week and was about to buy another for my wife but decided for the raffle...and here we are with two

i believe the common name is a tiger moray

my guess is uropterygius tigrinus

Just bought a brand new atomic z2 regulators for $20. ok, well, i won it in a raffle and spent 20 on tics.

that wasn't literal about the trashing thing, i just tossed it aside and stop thinking about it, but i'll eventually get it fixed

it free flow alright, i will see what my lds can do, diving tommorow...scuba brad, just won me over as a customer, will be ordering from you a couple of days

well, the tusa will be fixed and used as a backup, but the atomic???

I bought a tusa rs-350 recently and when i hooked it up, it free flowed like a mofo. Tossed it for trash. I then went out and bought an atomic z2 brand new also. Best regulator in rodale's review. The LDS bench tested it and it worked. It has been in the reg bag since and when it was hooked up...

it is true that most of them specimens in the aquarium are saved animals

what about an undescribed species? It is what it is. There could be many reasons to why a species is unnamed in a book. I'm not going to name them all, but here goes nothing: A rarely found species discovered by the author and the author isn't sure if the species has yet to be discovered but...

im not sure, i only have a top view, have you seen one?

this one is debatable, it's either what archman says it is Peristedion miniatum (armoured sea robin) or personally, I believe it is pterygotrigla multiocellatus (no common name) which is similar to the armoured sea robin except the prongs on the snout is a tad bit longer like the one in your picture

the one on the left may be a seriola hippos, i'm not too sure, maybe if you had a different angle pics and no, i do not mean the samson fish and i don't think you'll be able to find a pic on the net that easily of it

that's an almaco jack or seriola rivoliana on the right, your pics gives me a head ache