Bush Designates 3 Areas of Pacific as Marine National Monuments

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Oceana Diver

Guest
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
Location
Washington, DC
Bush Designates 3 Areas of Pacific as Marine National Monuments

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 5, 2009; 12:54 PM

President Bush will create three new marine national monuments in the Pacific Ocean Tuesday, according to White House spokeswoman Dana Perino, designated areas that will span 195,280 square miles and protect some of the most ecologically-rich areas of the world's oceans.

The decision to make the designations under the Antiquities Act, coming just two weeks before Bush leaves office, means that he will have protected more square miles of ocean than any person in history. In 2006 Bush created the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, an area of 138,000 square miles.

Two of the areas encompass a region known as the Line Islands, a relatively isolated and uninhabited string of islands in the central Pacific. The third area, in the western Pacific, includes the waters around a few islands in the northern Marianas chain and the Mariana Trench, the deepest ocean canyon in the world.

Both regions boast enormous biodiversity: Kingman Reef and other islands in the central Pacific area teem with sharks and other top predators as well as vibrant, healthy corals; the Mariana Trench and its nearby islands are home to several species of rare beaked whales and the Micronesian megapode -- an endangered bird that uses the heat from volcanic vents to incubate its eggs -- and also boast mud volcanoes, pools of boiling sulfur and the greatest microbial diversity on Earth.

"The president's actions will prevent the destruction and extraction of natural resources from these beautiful and biologically-diverse areas without conflicting with our military's activities and freedom of navigation, which are vital to our national security," Perino said. "And the public and future generations with benefit from science and knowledge. The President has a strong eight-year record of ocean conservation, and these new designated protected areas will comprise the largest area of ocean set aside as marine protected areas in the world."

While not all areas within the designated monuments will be fully protected -- slightly less than 60 percent of the total will be subject to prohibitions on fishing and other extractive activities -- environmentalists praised Bush for the move.

"With the designation of these new marine monuments in the Marianas Islands, American Samoa and the western pacific, George Bush has ushered in a new era of ocean conservation in the United States and the world at large," said Josh Reichert, managing director of the Pew Environment Group. "It has taken 137 years, since the creation of America's first national park in Yellowstone in 1872, to recognize that unique areas of the world's oceans deserve the same kind of protection as we have afforded similar places on land. And none too soon."
 
Unfortunately, the new monument designation really isn't going to do much from a conservation standpoint, other than slap a new name on things. I'm living in Guam and starting to work on some coral reef conservation issues and many of the local conservationists are pretty peeved about the monument designation.

The big problem is that it includes a lot of areas that were already protected and excludes the areas where much of the existing human activity occurs. Additionally, the designation gives the local authorities a lot of "flexibility" in how the monument designation and restrictions are managed and enforced (and this in an area that's not exactly known for progressive or intelligent management). There is little enforcement for this sort of regulation out here due to limited resources and enthusiasm, and the designation doesn't do much to fix the existing, gaping holes.

So, while this is a neat label to put on things, the view from out here isn't so favorable. The local resource users are annoyed at the federal government "interfering" without a public process to develop this (but relieved that the monument doesn't actually restrict their activities), and the local conservationists have mostly dismissed the whole thing as hot air.
 
So, while this is a neat label to put on things, the view from out here isn't so favorable. The local resource users are annoyed at the federal government "interfering" without a public process to develop this (but relieved that the monument doesn't actually restrict their activities), and the local conservationists have mostly dismissed the whole thing as hot air.

Thank you for framing this "initiative" in the true light of day! The Bush admin. has been tepid in providing substantive, or intelligent protection of the environment.

Cheers,

X
 

Back
Top Bottom