Nobody suggests you should.
Contingency planning involves reasonably predictable and foreseeable issues that could arise.
Technical diving courses introduce many of these foreseeable problems.
Experience, prudence, foresight and local diving knowledge will introduce more.
The danger is when people dive in ignorance of risks and consequences. Recreational diving courses typically gloss over these (at best), or absolutely deny them (at worst). Very, very few recreational instructors are actively enlightening divers on risks and consequences.
Jumping into technical (deco, overhead etc) diving, without the change of educational tone that tech-level training enables, can allow recreational divers to persist in a rose-tinted, risk-blind, outlook that can lead them into very unforgiving situations.... where most failures are beyond their capacity to resolve and the consequences are more damaging than they would predict.
This is why technical (all?) divers should progress the scope and challenge of their diving slowly and keep their dives forgiving / survivable until they've had chance to learn the lessons and broaden their experience.
Recreational no-stop diving is inherently safe and forgiving of failures. It's the place to make your mistakes, get away with it, and learn lessons.
Each step above that... into deco, into accelerated deco, into extended range, into mixed gas, into hypoxic gas, to expedition level tech depths.... becomes significantly less forgiving and offers more severe consequences to any failure and not having a practicable contingency measure for any issue that might arise.
Even where divers might be 'risk-educated'... there can also exist situations where those known risks are perceived only as hypothetical. Thereby enabling a "it can't happen to me" mindset. That mindset can be just as bad as being risk-ignorant.
When experience really is at a suitable level, the diver will have no false illusions of the risks they face, the consequences of failing to mitigate those risks with adequate contingencies... and the fact that those risks really do apply to them.