Gradient Factors and Deep Stops

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

How do your comments relate to Buhlmann ZH-L16B, and C? It's my impression that ZH-L16A was thought to be too liberal in the middle compartments for common use. M-values were reduced in several compartments for ZH-L16B, and it was suggested for table calculations. M-values were further reduced in many compartments for ZH-L16C, and it was suggested for use in dive computers. Seems like most, but not all, dive computers run C. The most popular computer running Buhlmann with GF has a recreational preset with a GF hi of 95.

I think you're right about B and C. Using a dive computer with GFhigh=95 is a lot less conservative than using the table, particularly in cold water where the table diver reads the table at the next longer bottom time, or at 150% of bottom time in case of exertion at depth (Deco2000 application rules). Later they developed ZHL8ADT for dive computers that considers temperature and exertion, although the latter is difficult to measure.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom